Revision as of 02:31, 21 September 2023 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,373,642 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Þjarkur/Archive 5. (BOT)Tag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:46, 22 September 2023 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,133,427 edits →New pages patrol newsletter: new sectionTags: Reverted MassMessage deliveryNext edit → | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Susan ] (]) 16:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC) | Susan ] (]) 16:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
== New pages patrol newsletter == | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per ], causes errors for screen readers --> | |||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | |||
|} | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
{| style="float: right; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
] | |||
'''Backlog update:''' | |||
At the time of this message, there are ''11,300'' articles and ''15,600'' redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews! | |||
'''October backlog elimination drive''': | |||
A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can ]. | |||
'''PageTriage code upgrades''': | |||
Upgrades to the ] code, initiated by the ] in 2022 and actioned by the ] in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found ]. As part of this work, the ] now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed - it will replace the current version soon. | |||
'''Notability tip''': | |||
Professors can meet ] #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their ] or ] profile and take a look at their ] and number of citations. As a ''very rough'' rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of ], a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD. | |||
'''Reviewing tip''': | |||
If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge. | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
'''Reminders:''' | |||
*You can access live chat with patrollers on the . | |||
*Consider adding ] to your watchlist. | |||
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]. | |||
{{refend}} | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Sent by Illusion Flame on behalf of the New Page Patrol team. --> | |||
] (]) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Illusion Flame@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1176571921 --> |
Revision as of 16:46, 22 September 2023
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
Or summon me to another discussion with {{hidden ping|Þjarkur}}
or {{hidden ping|Thjarkur}}
Primerica Page - Help please!
Hi, Need some assistance/guidance. First, I have a {{Edit COI}}
and will not make any edits on my own - but there seems to be some updates on the Primerica page that are citing sources that are opinion pieces and not legitimate sources. I am specifically referring to this line:
Primerica has been described as a multi-level marketing company.
Obviously MLM is not a term we like to associate ourselves with and we dispute that we are. But even with that, the term MLM has been moved up on the page and now citing sources that do not follow WP:RS. Could you review this for us please?
Thanks so very much,
Susan TermLifeOG (talk) 16:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol newsletter
Hello Þjarkur,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)