Revision as of 06:04, 2 November 2023 editRublamb (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers108,094 edits OneClickArchived "Comments" to Talk:Sphinx Head/Archive 1← Previous edit |
Revision as of 06:05, 2 November 2023 edit undoRublamb (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers108,094 edits OneClickArchived "GA" to Talk:Sphinx Head/Archive 1Next edit → |
Line 29: |
Line 29: |
|
{{WikiProject Secret Societies|class=Start|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Secret Societies|class=Start|importance=Low}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
== GA == |
|
|
|
|
|
I've remove the article from ] because it is more of a list than an article. If you want to, you can nominate it at ]. |
|
|
:I disagree with this. |
|
|
# The article was nominated in good faith. |
|
|
# It has been in the queue for a long time |
|
|
# It does not obviously ]. |
|
|
# In light of that, it should remain on queue until such time that an editor can evaluate the article fully in connection with the ] and render a decision in accordance with those criteria. |
|
|
Simply removing an article from the nomination queue for a reason that has not been established as a quick-fail criterion is irregular, which has a knock on effect on the trustworthiness of the Good Article nomination and evaluation process. I've made further remarks ]. ] has opened a ] page as well. Please join the discussion there. Thank you. ] (]) 17:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
=== GA Review of Sphinx Head === |
|
|
Following the discussion on the ], there is general agreement that a misunderstanding has taken place, that articles should depart from the nomination queue only after an evaluation has taken place and has been published on a subpage. I am undertaking that review now. Accordingly, I am taking the extraordinary steps of reverting ]'s edits to restore the {{tl|GA nominee}} template and establish a review page, which will be transcluded to this section here. Apologies to the editors awaiting an evaluation for so long now. Thank you for your patience. ] (]) 15:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What's this group's connection to the Dartmouth College society with a similiar name? I suggest breaking the link between the two entires, unless someone knows something unreported in either entry. ] (]) 14:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)SLY111 |
|
|
{{Talk:Sphinx Head/GA1}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Assessment comment== |
|
==Assessment comment== |
Last edited at 01:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC).
Substituted at 06:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)