Revision as of 21:50, 20 November 2023 editMaddy from Celeste (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers9,394 edits →Telling people who believe in a long standing definition of a word they are no longer that is wrong: rm WP:FORUM post← Previous edit |
Revision as of 04:33, 26 November 2023 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,295,473 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Gender/Archive 11) (botNext edit → |
Line 54: |
Line 54: |
|
In contemporary times, most literature and institutions that are concerned with women's role in development incorporate a GAD perspective, with the United Nations taking the lead of mainstreaming the GAD approach through its system and development policies. <ref>{{cite book |last1=United Nations. Office of the Special Adviser on Gender Issues, & Advancement of Women |title=Gender Mainstreaming an Overview |date=2002 |publisher=United Nations Publications |location=New York |url=https://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/pdf/e65237.pdf}}</ref><!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17 May 2019 (UTC)</small> |
|
In contemporary times, most literature and institutions that are concerned with women's role in development incorporate a GAD perspective, with the United Nations taking the lead of mainstreaming the GAD approach through its system and development policies. <ref>{{cite book |last1=United Nations. Office of the Special Adviser on Gender Issues, & Advancement of Women |title=Gender Mainstreaming an Overview |date=2002 |publisher=United Nations Publications |location=New York |url=https://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/pdf/e65237.pdf}}</ref><!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17 May 2019 (UTC)</small> |
|
{{ref talk}} |
|
{{ref talk}} |
|
|
|
|
== Number of genders in the lead - missing == |
|
|
|
|
|
While I expect the exact number is a matter of dispute, it would be good to address this in the lead somehow. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 03:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:It can't go in the lead unless it is already in the body and I'm not seeing it there. Also, it isn't even a meaningful thing to try to include because most conceptions of gender (other than those that insist on their being only two) do not see it as an enumerable set of discrete entities. If you ever see three people arguing about whether there are 2, 5 or 17 genders then you can safely ignore all of them as they are all making the same mistake. That said, I don't think that you ever will because I have never seen anybody seriously trying to count all the genders. (Although I have seen people doing that as a joke or as a way to be annoying.) The lead is currently doing a good job by saying "man, woman, or other gender identity". This correctly tells the reader that there are two extremely popular named gender identities, which they are presumably already familiar with, and also a range of others. I'm not seeing how we could improve on that. --] (]) 17:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Past discussions of lead == |
|
|
{{atop|This post is added for informational and accessibility purposes}} |
|
|
fyi: ] and ] include extensive discussion that helped form the compromise to develop the current lead: |
|
|
{{tq2|'''Gender''' includes the social, psychological, cultural and behavioral aspects of being a ], ], or other ].<ref name="haig">{{cite journal|date=April 2004 |title=The Inexorable Rise of Gender and the Decline of Sex: Social Change in Academic Titles, 1945–2001 |url=https://www.oeb.harvard.edu/faculty/haig/publications_files/04inexorablerise.pdf |journal=Archives of Sexual Behavior |volume=33 |issue=2 |pages=87–96 |doi=10.1023/B:ASEB.0000014323.56281.0d |pmid=15146141|first1=David |last1=Haig |author-link1=David Haig (biologist) |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120615160110/https://www.oeb.harvard.edu/faculty/haig/Publications_files/04InexorableRise.pdf |archive-date=15 June 2012 |citeseerx=10.1.1.359.9143 |s2cid=7005542 }}</ref><ref name="www.who.int">{{Cite web|title=What do we mean by "sex" and "gender"? |publisher=] |access-date=26 November 2015 |url=https://apps.who.int/gender/whatisgender/en/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170130022356/https://apps.who.int/gender/whatisgender/en/ |archive-date=30 January 2017|url-status=dead }}</ref> Depending on the context, this may include ]-based ]s (i.e. ]s) and ].<ref name="udry">{{cite journal|date=November 1994|title=The Nature of Gender|journal=Demography|volume=31|issue=4|pages=561–573|doi=10.2307/2061790|jstor=2061790|pmid=7890091|first1=J. Richard|last1=Udry|s2cid=38476067|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lindqvist |first1=Anna |last2=Sendén |first2=Marie Gustafsson |last3=Renström |first3=Emma A. |title=What is gender, anyway: a review of the options for operationalising gender |journal=Psychology & Sexuality |date=2 October 2021 |volume=12 |issue=4 |pages=332–344 |doi=10.1080/19419899.2020.1729844|s2cid=213397968 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author1=National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine |editor-first1=Nancy |editor-first2=Marshall |editor-first3=Tara |editor-last1=Bates |editor-last2=Chin |editor-last3=Becker |title=Measuring Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation |date= 2022 |doi=10.17226/26424 |publisher=The National Academies Press |location=Washington, DC|pmid=35286054 |isbn=978-0-309-27510-1 |s2cid=247432505 }}</ref>}} |
|
|
{{reflist-talk}} ] (]) 16:58, 27 August 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
{{abot}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Culture== |
|
==Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Culture== |
The rise of criticism against the WID approach led to the emergence of a new theory, that of Women and Development (WAD). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhum.group2 (talk • contribs) 17 May 2019 (UTC)
In contemporary times, most literature and institutions that are concerned with women's role in development incorporate a GAD perspective, with the United Nations taking the lead of mainstreaming the GAD approach through its system and development policies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhum.group2 (talk • contribs) 17 May 2019 (UTC)