Misplaced Pages

Talk:Myanmar: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:55, 29 November 2023 edit121.121.169.99 (talk) Semi-protected edit request on 29 November 2023burma: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 20:57, 29 November 2023 edit undoAntiDionysius (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers39,318 edits Semi-protected edit request on 29 November 2023burma: ansNext edit →
Line 119: Line 119:
== Semi-protected edit request on 29 November 2023burma == == Semi-protected edit request on 29 November 2023burma ==


{{edit semi-protected|Myanmar|answered=no}} {{edit semi-protected|Myanmar|answered=y}}
] (]) 20:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC) ] (]) 20:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

:{{esp|xy}} --] (]) 20:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:57, 29 November 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Myanmar article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Former featured article candidateMyanmar is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 7, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 16, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
July 24, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 4, 2008, January 4, 2009, January 4, 2010, January 4, 2011, March 27, 2011, January 4, 2012, and January 4, 2013.
Current status: Former featured article candidate
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
Template:Vital article
WikiProject iconCountries
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry
WikiProject Countries to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconMyanmar Top‑importance
WikiProject icon Myanmar is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all Myanmar related articles on Misplaced Pages. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Misplaced Pages aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconAsia Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSoutheast Asia Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
          Other talk page banners
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by a media organization:
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

There is more than one name for this country. Strong arguments exist for the use of both names as an article title; however, the most recent requested move discussion found that the article title should be at Myanmar. Burma redirects there.

  • RM, Burma → Myanmar, No consensus, 12 October 2011, discussion
  • RM, Burma → Myanmar, Not moved, 8 August 2012, discussion
    • MRV, Burma → Myanmar, Endorsed, 26 August 2012, discussion
  • RM, Burma → Myanmar, Moved, 7 August 2015, discussion
Older discussions:
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Archives
Index
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Archive 13Archive 14


This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.


Semi-protected edit request on 3 August 2022 (2)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I do not know how to correct it. I just wanted to tell someone that the Burmese characters are not showing up. Just empty boxes. I think Burmese is in the Unicode font system, and there must be a way to code it to show properly to ALL browsers.

Here is a clip of the sentence where I see empty square boxes from "Burmese:" to "; pronounced"

All the other characters are showing properly in Chrome browser. Not sure what is broken on this page, but wanted to tell someone. Thank you.

"Myanmar, officially the Republic of the Union of Myanmar (Burmese: ပြည်ထောင်စု သမ္မတ မြန်မာနိုင်ငံတော်; pronounced " 2601:2C6:4600:F230:C81E:99C2:3F1D:C922 (talk) 14:49, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

This appears to be an issue with your browser. I'm not seeing any issues with multiple browsers on multiple devices. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:26, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 October 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please delete the reference to Myanmar in the second sentence as the largest country in mainland Southeast Asia. Both Thailand and Vietnam are larger in terms of geographic size and population size.

The first sentence could just read: "Myanmar, officially the Republic of the Union of Myanmar, also known as Burma, is a country in Southeast Asia with a population of about 54 million as of 2017." Openburma (talk) 11:04, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

@Openburma: Are Thailand and Vietnam larger than Myanmar by area? The figures listed in the articles for the countries indicate that Myanmar is larger than both. Do you believe those figures are incorrect? Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 05:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 March 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I would like to add the following information to the Political Culture section of the Misplaced Pages page:

On February 1, 2021, military rule was seized again, returning the power to an authoritarian system and reversing the transition to democracy that Myanmar had seen since 2010. The country can be classified as either a closed autocracy or an electoral autocracy depending on the elections that the military is planning to hold in 2024. The military establishment plans to hold elections as a way to transition the country out of post-coup conflict and to consolidate their political dominance. However, the junta has enacted laws in preparation for these elections that restrict the voting power of the citizens. These laws include: requiring voting political parties to register at least 100,000 members within three months of registration and banning parties that are declared “terrorist,” by the military, which represents any of their opponents. Additionally, the military rule has extended to local levels. Officials in central-level departments and local administrations were replaced with bureaucrats appointed by the military. Additionally, officials of villages and wards, which were previously elected by citizens, are now chosen by military-appointed township councils.

The Freedom House rating for democracy scores Myanmar at 9/60 in 2022, with a score of 0/40 for political rights and 9/60 for civil liberties. This exhibits a decline from 2021, where Freedom House scored Myanmar at 13/40 for political rights and 15/60 for civil liberties. Vikkixu (talk) 01:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:14, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Lead section readability and relevance

The lead section currently has four paragraphs, none of which are short. However, approximately one-third to one-half of the material in those four paragraphs is detailed explanations of relatively distant history.

I propose to modify the lead section in the following way:

1. Keep the current first paragraph as is.

2. Move the current fourth paragraph to be directly after the first one.

3. Transfer the current second paragraph, along with approximately the first half of the current third paragraph, into the History section.

4. ... which leaves the second half of the current third paragraph as the ending of the lead section.


It's not ideal, but I think it would be an improvement. In my opinion, the current amount of detail about old history doesn't belong in the lead section. TooManyFingers (talk) 15:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

The history is certainly excessive and should be collapsed into one shorter paragraph, and the lead in general is a bit lengthy. Generally history is the second paragraph, and the last paragraph contains the details on the foreign relations. Perhaps the fourth paragraph can be split rather than being completely shifted. CMD (talk) 01:53, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 November 2023burma

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
121.121.169.99 (talk) 20:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. --AntiDionysius (talk) 20:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Categories: