| Revision as of 21:03, 20 August 2004 editOrtolan88 (talk | contribs)10,369 edits Why delete links to Lists of fictional animals?← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:09, 20 August 2004 edit undoVioletriga (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users37,361 edits why I'm deleting the links to Lists of fictional animalsNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Why delete links to ]? There has to be a pretty good reason for removing links in Misplaced Pages, which is all about links. ] 21:03, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) | Why delete links to ]? There has to be a pretty good reason for removing links in Misplaced Pages, which is all about links. ] 21:03, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) | ||
| :Because the only content of that article is a failed redirect to ] and all the relevant articles are in that category anyway. ] 21:09, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:09, 20 August 2004
Is there anybody out there?
Yep, me. I'm aware of the eclampsia problem. Unfortunately, I know too little about it to properly write it up from scratch. Do you have any information I could fall back on? Nice review articles from good medical journals are always welcome. JFW | T@lk 16:11, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Why delete links to Lists of fictional animals? There has to be a pretty good reason for removing links in Misplaced Pages, which is all about links. Ortolan88 21:03, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Because the only content of that article is a failed redirect to Category:Lists of fictional animals and all the relevant articles are in that category anyway. violet/riga 21:09, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)