Misplaced Pages

Talk:Panama Canal: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:44, 27 January 2024 editIljhgtn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users36,108 edits AmE← Previous edit Revision as of 12:53, 30 January 2024 edit undoMSGJ (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators130,796 edits harmonise ratings of PIQA projectsNext edit →
Line 54: Line 54:
{{WikiProject Civil engineering|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Civil engineering|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Latin America|importance=Mid}} {{WikiProject Latin America|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Trade|class=B|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Trade|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Transport|Maritime=Yes|class=B|importance=High|B1=no|B2=yes|B3=yes|B4=yes|B5=yes}} {{WikiProject Transport|Maritime=Yes|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Mid}} {{WikiProject United States|importance=Mid}}
}} }}

Revision as of 12:53, 30 January 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Panama Canal article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Former featured articlePanama Canal is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 23, 2006.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 20, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
July 20, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 12, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 29, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
January 10, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
July 12, 2009Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 15, 2004, August 15, 2005, August 15, 2006, August 15, 2007, August 15, 2008, August 15, 2009, August 15, 2010, and August 15, 2014.
Current status: Former featured article
This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconPanama (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Panama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PanamaWikipedia:WikiProject PanamaTemplate:WikiProject PanamaPanama
WikiProject iconCivil engineering High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLatin America Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Latin AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Latin AmericaLatin America
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTrade High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTransport: Maritime High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Maritime task force (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconUnited States Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
InfoThe route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Panama Canal map.

future expansion ?

it is here any plans to rebuild old lock to wider ones (with water saving basins) ? or to build new ones ? since shiping trends clerly show that new panamax is desired with demand for old panamax ships hitting ground, meaning at some point in future no ship in use will be able to pass old locks (or at least in significiant numbers).

2A00:1028:9198:E50E:C0FE:B67C:3CBA:20AB (talk) 13:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Discrepancies?

While reading the article, there is a discrepancy to be noted. In the article itself, it states that the SS Cristobal was the first to make the transit through the Panama Canal on August 3 1914, but the picture states that it is the SS Ancon on August 15 1914. Further research may need to be done to solidify which is the true first. Gladdisiator (talk) 20:27, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Gladdisiator

Expansion completion date vs. Panamamax vessel in photo date

New to this but: article states the expansion to allow panamax vessels was completed June 26, 2016 but the panamax vessel in article photo states it is entering the lock in March 2013. Apologies if I am misunderstanding. Cheers, Billy Dogboy777 (talk) 04:52, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Billy. Great question – I believe that both the article and the photo caption are correct. The photo, which as you noted was taken in March 2013, shows a Panamax ship traversing the Miraflores locks before the expansion project was completed. On the other hand, the article states The new locks opened for commercial traffic on 26 June 2016, and the first ship to cross the canal using the third set of locks was a modern New Panamax vessel, the Chinese-owned container ship Cosco Shipping Panama. "New Panamax" refers to ships that are even larger than the old "Panamax" ships, and they pass through a set of new locks (the Agua Clara and Cocoli locks) that were constructed next to the old locks. See the photo to the right. So there is no contradiction between the article and the caption. Does this answer make sense? Best, Altamel (talk) 05:12, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

No mention of the US invasion of Panama

It came to my attention that the article doesn't mention the US invasion of Panama. Is there a reason? 46.19.86.168 (talk) 16:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Why should it be mentioned? This article is about the Panama Canal, not about Panama. The Banner talk 17:19, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

not a single word on ecological and ecosystem impacts,

just praise — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.71.34.207 (talk) 12:33, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

I was thinking exactly the same. Bountykilla (talk) 14:39, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes, 47.71.34.207, Bountykilla couldnt agree with you more- it´s horrific how the thing is extolled. the article is dominated by engineering details. I just added merely the fact how it works and how water wasting this thing is-An average of 200,000,000 L (52,000,000 US gal) of fresh water used in a single passing.- none of this was mentioned. maybe we need to add a section?--Wuerzele (talk) 21:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Gatun is also the main freshwater reservoir for water for the population, which has doubled in size since 1980. Since there has been no change in freshwater collection the last sentence of the lede is at least incomplete if not outright fabrication. Greglocock (talk) 23:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Panama canal lock sizes

File:Panama canal lock sizes.png says that the maximum DWT for New Panamax is 60–100. This is obviously wrong. It's also wrong in the original source at eia. Maybe this is supposed to be thousands? GA-RT-22 (talk) 17:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Indeed. I've added a note to the page talk on Commons. Perhaps there's an replacement table available somewhere? - Davidships (talk) 12:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Categories: