Misplaced Pages

Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:17, 27 January 2024 view source182.48.199.177 (talk) Undid revision 1199521116 by Ekdalian (talk) reverted under WP:BRD and WP:ONUS to earlier stable version. the editor has created a mess between peshwa era, british era and SHivaji era by randomly using sources. Ekdalian, please give me a few hours - I will include all sources and content and all POV and add it in correct order.Tags: Undo Reverted← Previous edit Revision as of 08:18, 27 January 2024 view source 182.48.199.177 (talk) Undid revision 1199527075 by 182.48.199.177 (talk) self revert. I can edit directly the current versionTags: Undo RevertedNext edit →
Line 33: Line 33:


Kayastha dynasty's kings Gangaya Sahini, Jannigadeva, Tripurarideva and Ambadeva Kayastha were CKPs claiming Kshatriya varna ruled over vast swathes of land in ] country, and they are recorded in Andhra history dating back to the 13th century <small>CE</small>.{{Citation needed|date=January 2024}} Kayastha dynasty's kings Gangaya Sahini, Jannigadeva, Tripurarideva and Ambadeva Kayastha were CKPs claiming Kshatriya varna ruled over vast swathes of land in ] country, and they are recorded in Andhra history dating back to the 13th century <small>CE</small>.{{Citation needed|date=January 2024}}



According to a letter written by the ], who confirmed the 'Vedadhikar' of the CKPs, the title '']'', which means high official, must have been given to the CKPs by the Shilahar kings of Konkan.{{Citation needed|date=January 2024}} According to a letter written by the ], who confirmed the 'Vedadhikar' of the CKPs, the title '']'', which means high official, must have been given to the CKPs by the Shilahar kings of Konkan.{{Citation needed|date=January 2024}}
Line 40: Line 39:
one ] that explicitly called them ''Chandraseniya Kshatriyas''. He also cited documents from ] and ] Brahmins ratified by ] himself that proved their rights over the ]. His letter is addressed to all Brahmins.<ref name="MiltonWagle" />{{Quote needed|date=January 2024}} one ] that explicitly called them ''Chandraseniya Kshatriyas''. He also cited documents from ] and ] Brahmins ratified by ] himself that proved their rights over the ]. His letter is addressed to all Brahmins.<ref name="MiltonWagle" />{{Quote needed|date=January 2024}}


According to the American ] and scholar of Religious Studies and ] Studies who is the Professor of International Studies and Comparative Religion at the ], ]{{blockquote|In the thirteenth century they might have been considered as equal to brahmin or simply within the Brahminic ecumene, this despite the fact that modern day CKPs of Maharashtra understand themselves to have arisen from the Kshatriya varna. Thus they are an intermediate caste between brahmins and Kshatriyas.<ref name = "Novetzke">{{cite book| author = Christian Lee Noverzke|title = The Qutodian revolution : Vernacularization, Religion, and the Premodern Public Sphere in India, part 2| page = 159 | publisher = Columbia University Press | year =2016}}</ref>}}


According to the American ] and scholar of Religious Studies and ] Studies who is the Professor of International Studies and Comparative Religion at the ], ] {{blockquote|In the thirteenth century they might have been considered as equal to brahmin or simply within the Brahminic ecumene, this despite the fact that modern day CKPs of Maharashtra understand themselves to have arisen from the Kshatriya varna. Thus they are an intermediate caste between brahmins and Kshatriyas.<ref name = "Novetzke">{{cite book| author = Christian Lee Noverzke|title = The Qutodian revolution : Vernacularization, Religion, and the Premodern Public Sphere in India, part 2| page = 159 | publisher = Columbia University Press | year =2016}}</ref>}}


===Deccan sultanate and Maratha Era=== ===Deccan sultanate and Maratha Era===
Line 53: Line 50:
In 17th-century Maharashtra, during ]'s time, the so-called higher classes i.e. the Marathi ], CKPs and ] Brahmins, due to social and religious restrictions were the only communities that had a system of education for males. Except these three castes, education for all other castes and communities was very limited and consisted of listening to stories from religious texts like the ] or to ] and thus the common masses remained illiterate and backward. Hence Shivaji was compelled to use people from these three educated communities – Marathi Brahmins, CKPs and Saraswat Brahmins – for civilian posts as they required education and intellectual maturity. However, in this time period, these three as well as other communities, depending on caste, also contributed their share to Shivaji's "Swaraj"(self-rule) by being cavalry soldiers, commanders, mountaineers, seafarers etc.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Kantak |first=M. R.|title=The Political Role of Different Hindu Castes and Communities in Maharashtra in the Foundation of the Shivaji Maharaj's Swarajya |journal=Bulletin of the Deccan College Research Institute |date=1978 |volume=38 |issue=1 |page=44,47 |jstor=42931051| quote= (page 44) Next to the Brahmins came the Saraswats and the Kayastha Prabhus. Except the Brahmins, the saraswats and the kayasthas, all other castes and communities in Maharashtra received very little education, which was the sole privilege of the higher castes.(page 47)A charge may be leveled against Shivaji Maharaj that he recruited in his civil departments the people from the so called intellectual classes only. It is a fact that Shivaji Maharaj's civil services were dominated by the Brahmins, the Prabhus and the Saraswats. However, the blame on it does not fall on Shivaji Maharaj but on the social framework within which he was workings. As has been pointed out earlier in this article , in 17th century Maharashtra, due to social and religious restrictions, education was the privilege of the higher classes only. Consequently, the common masses remained illiterate and backward. For civil posts, intellectual maturity, some standard of education as well as knowledge of reading, writing and account keeping ,etc. were essential. Shivaji Maharaj found these requisites readily in the Brahmins, the Saraswats and the Kayasthas which were the only educated classes then. Shivaji Maharaj had no alternative but to recruit them in his services for maintaining a high standard of efficiency.}}</ref> In 17th-century Maharashtra, during ]'s time, the so-called higher classes i.e. the Marathi ], CKPs and ] Brahmins, due to social and religious restrictions were the only communities that had a system of education for males. Except these three castes, education for all other castes and communities was very limited and consisted of listening to stories from religious texts like the ] or to ] and thus the common masses remained illiterate and backward. Hence Shivaji was compelled to use people from these three educated communities – Marathi Brahmins, CKPs and Saraswat Brahmins – for civilian posts as they required education and intellectual maturity. However, in this time period, these three as well as other communities, depending on caste, also contributed their share to Shivaji's "Swaraj"(self-rule) by being cavalry soldiers, commanders, mountaineers, seafarers etc.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Kantak |first=M. R.|title=The Political Role of Different Hindu Castes and Communities in Maharashtra in the Foundation of the Shivaji Maharaj's Swarajya |journal=Bulletin of the Deccan College Research Institute |date=1978 |volume=38 |issue=1 |page=44,47 |jstor=42931051| quote= (page 44) Next to the Brahmins came the Saraswats and the Kayastha Prabhus. Except the Brahmins, the saraswats and the kayasthas, all other castes and communities in Maharashtra received very little education, which was the sole privilege of the higher castes.(page 47)A charge may be leveled against Shivaji Maharaj that he recruited in his civil departments the people from the so called intellectual classes only. It is a fact that Shivaji Maharaj's civil services were dominated by the Brahmins, the Prabhus and the Saraswats. However, the blame on it does not fall on Shivaji Maharaj but on the social framework within which he was workings. As has been pointed out earlier in this article , in 17th century Maharashtra, due to social and religious restrictions, education was the privilege of the higher classes only. Consequently, the common masses remained illiterate and backward. For civil posts, intellectual maturity, some standard of education as well as knowledge of reading, writing and account keeping ,etc. were essential. Shivaji Maharaj found these requisites readily in the Brahmins, the Saraswats and the Kayasthas which were the only educated classes then. Shivaji Maharaj had no alternative but to recruit them in his services for maintaining a high standard of efficiency.}}</ref>


==== Varna dispute and gramanya ====
At times, there were ]s, also known as "Vedokta disputes", initiated by certain individuals who tried to stop CKP rights to ]. These individuals based their opinion on the belief that no true Kshatriyas existed in the ]; however the upanayana for CKPs were supported by prominent Brahmin arbitrators like Gaga Bhatt and ] who gave decisions in the favor of the community.<ref name="MiltonWagle" /> Just after the death of Shivaji this dispute raised again but his time the opinion shifted against the views of Gangabhatta.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Deshpande |first=Madhav |date=2010-01-01 |title=Ksatriyas in the Kali Age? Gāgābhatta & His Opponents |url=https://brill.com/view/journals/iij/53/2/article-p95_1.xml |journal=Indo-Iranian Journal |language=en |volume=53 |issue=2 |pages=95–120 |doi=10.1163/001972410X12686674794853 |issn=0019-7246}}</ref> The ''gramanya'' during the Peshwa eras finally culminated in the favor of the CKPs as the Vedokta had support from the ] and this was affirmed by two letters from Brahmins from Varanasi as well as one from Pune Brahmins ratified by Bajirao II himself. In the final Gramanya, started by Neelkanthashastri and his relative ], a rival of the CKP Vedic scholar V.S.Parasnis at the court of Satara, the Shankaracharya himself intervened as arbiter and he gave his verdict by fully endorsing the rights over Vedas for the CKP. The Shankaracharya's letter is addressed to all Brahmins and he refers to various ]s, earlier verdicts in the favour of the CKPS as well as letters about the lineage of the CKP to make his decision and void the dispute started by Natu.<ref name="MiltonWagle" />{{Full citation needed|date=January 2024}}<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Deshpande |first=Madhav |date=2010-01-01 |title=Ksatriyas in the Kali Age? Gāgābhatta & His Opponents |url=https://brill.com/view/journals/iij/53/2/article-p95_1.xml |journal=Indo-Iranian Journal |language=en |volume=53 |issue=2 |pages=95–120 |doi=10.1163/001972410X12686674794853 |issn=0019-7246}}</ref>
The CKPs, described as a traditionally well-educated and intellectual group.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal |last=Deshpande |first=Madhav |date=2010-01-01 |title=Ksatriyas in the Kali Age? Gāgābhatta & His Opponents |url=https://brill.com/view/journals/iij/53/2/article-p95_1.xml |journal=Indo-Iranian Journal |language=en |volume=53 |issue=2 |pages=95–120 |doi=10.1163/001972410X12686674794853 |issn=0019-7246}}</ref> They claimed themselves as Kshatriyas, while predominant regional Brahmin belief was that they were Sudras.<ref name="mifflin1970">{{cite book |author=Harold Robert Isaacs |url=https://archive.org/details/educationreading0000lind |title=Education: readings in the processes of cultural transmission |publisher=Houghton Mifflin |year=1970 |editor=Harry M. Lindquist |page= |quote=..in this case the particular tradition of a Kshatriya caste called "CKP"(Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu). This group described as an intellectual community came into conflict with the Brahmins at least 300 years ago over their right to be teachers and scholars |url-access=registration}}</ref> They even demanded privileges of the Brahmin order – the rights to conduct the ] rituals (all by themselves) and ''satkarma'' (all six karmas of the Brahmin order) for which they were opposed especially by the ]s.<ref name="sssny1973" /><ref name="sandhyagokhale">{{Cite book |last=Gokhale |first=Sandhya |title=The Chitpwans |date=2008 |publisher=Shubhi Publications |pages=30 |quote= claimed privilege of the traditional Brahmin order, the right to perform Vedic Ritual...in this they were frequently opposed by the Brahmins, especially the Chitpawans}}</ref> The dispute regarding the varna status of them broke out a few years before Shivaji’s coronation.<ref name=":2" /> At times, there were ]s, i.e. "dispute involving the supposed violation of the Brahmanical ritual code of behavior" also known as "Vedokta disputes", initiated by certain individuals who tried to stop CKP rights to ]. These individuals based their opinion on the belief that no true Kshatriyas existed in the ]; however the upanayana for CKPs were supported by prominent Brahmin arbitrators like Gaga Bhatt and ] who gave decisions in the favor of the community.<ref name="MiltonWagle" /> Just after the death of Shivaji this dispute raised again but his time the opinion shifted against the views of Gangabhatta.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Deshpande |first=Madhav |date=2010-01-01 |title=Ksatriyas in the Kali Age? Gāgābhatta & His Opponents |url=https://brill.com/view/journals/iij/53/2/article-p95_1.xml |journal=Indo-Iranian Journal |language=en |volume=53 |issue=2 |pages=95–120 |doi=10.1163/001972410X12686674794853 |issn=0019-7246}}</ref> During the Peshwa era, the CKP's main preceptor or Vedic ] was a Brahmin by the name of Abashastri Takle, who was referred to by the CKP community as "Gurubaba". Sale of liquor was banned by the Brahmin administrators to the Brahmins, CKPs, ] and Saraswat Brahmins but there was no objection to other castes drinking it or even to the castes such as Bhandaris from manufacturing it. ''Gramanyas'' were very common in that era and some Chitpawans, at times, initiated ''Gramanya'' against other communities – Prabhu communities (CKP, Pathare Prabhu), Saraswats and ].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Gokhale |first=Sandhya |title=The Chitpwans |date=2008 |publisher=Shubhi publications |page=204 |quote=The jati disputes were not a rare occurrence in Maharashtra. There are recorded instances of disputes between jatis such as Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhus and the Chitpawans, Pathare Prabhus and the Chitpawans, Saraswats and the Chitpawans and Shukla Yajurvedi and the Chitpawans. The intra-caste dispute involving the supposed violation of the Brahmanical ritual code of behavior was called Gramanya in Marathi.}}</ref> They did not come to fruition however. The ''gramanya'' during the Peshwa eras finally culminated in the favor of the CKPs as the Vedokta had support from the ] and this was affirmed by two letters from Brahmins from Varanasi as well as one from Pune Brahmins ratified by Bajirao II himself. In the final Gramanya, started by Neelkanthashastri and his relative ], a rival of the CKP Vedic scholar V.S.Parasnis at the court of Satara, the Shankaracharya himself intervened as arbiter and he gave his verdict by fully endorsing the rights over Vedas for the CKP. The Shankaracharya's letter is addressed to all Brahmins and he refers to various ]s, earlier verdicts in the favour of the CKPS as well as letters about the lineage of the CKP to make his decision and void the dispute started by Natu.<ref name="MiltonWagle" />{{Full citation needed|date=January 2024}} Modern scholars quote statements that show that they were due to political malice – especially given that the Gramanya was started by a certain Yamaji Pant who had sent an assassin to murder a rival CKP. This was noted by Gangadharshastri Dikshit who gave his verdict in favor of the CKPs. Abashastri Takle had used the scriptures to establish their "Vedokta". Similarly, the famous jurist ] also supported the CKPs Vedokta.<ref name="MiltonWagle" />


The analysis of ''gramanyas'' against the CKP was done in depth by historians from the ]. Modern scholars conclude that the fact that the CKPs held high ranking positions in administration and the military and as statesmen was a "double edged sword". Historians, while analyzing the ''gramanyas'' state "As statesmen, they were engulfed in the court intrigues and factions, and, as a result, were prone to persecution by opposing factions. On the other hand, their influence in the court meant that they could wield enough political clout to effect settlements in favor of their caste.". The late Indian professor of sociology, ] commented on the strictness of the caste system during the Peshwa rule in Maharashtra by noting that even advanced caste such as the Prabhus had to establish rights to carry on with the vedic rituals.<ref name="MiltonWagle" /><ref>{{cite book |author=Govind Sadashiv Ghurye |url=https://archive.org/details/casteraceinindia0000ghur |title=Caste and Race in India |publisher=Popular Prakashan |year=1969 |isbn=9788171542055 |pages=, 14 |quote=(page 5) Thus the Brahmin government of Poona, while passing some legislation prohibiting the manufacture and sale of liquors, excluded the bhandaris kolis and similar other castes from the operation thereof but strictly forbade the sale of drinks to Brahmins, Shenvis, Prabhus and Government officers (page 14). Such an advanced caste as the Prabhus in the Maratha country had to establish its rights to carry on the rites according to the vedic formulae which were being questioned at the time of the later peshwas |url-access=registration}}</ref><ref name="Derett">{{cite book |title=Indology and Law: Studies in the Honour or Professor J.Duncan M.Derett |publisher=Südasien-Institut – Universität Heidelberg |year=1982 |editor1=Gunther-Dietz Sontheimer |page=325 |quote=(page 321) Gangadhar Dikshit remarked "The proof in favor of the prabhus vedokta adduced by their preceptor is preponderant. There is no argument against it. Who can, therefore, dare say that the Shastra is false? Their preceptor Gurubaba (Abashastri Takle), indeed, quoting from the scriptures convincingly argued the Prabhus claims to Vedokta before the Pandit assembly by proving their Kshatriya genealogy (page 325). As the prabhus's Gurubaba stated in the Pandit assembly, that the gramanya initiated by Yamaji was due to political malice("rajyakarani dvesha"). It did not therefore, come to fruition. That there was an active enmity between Govindrao, a leading member of the prabhu caste and Yamaji, is clear from a document in which it is stated that Yamaji Pant actually sent an assassin to murder Govindrao. The Prabhus eminence as soldier-statesmen and high ranking administrative officers from Bajiravs time to end of Peshwai was both an asset and a liability. As statesmen, they were engulfed in the court intrigues and factions, and, as a result, were prone to persecution by opposing factions. On the other hand, their influence in the court meant that they could wield enough political clout to effect settlements in favor of their caste.(page 328)It is significant that the two Prabhu Sardars, Nilkanthrav Page and Ravji Apaji were the key members of the faction which helped Bajirav to acquire the Peshwaship. |editor2=Parameswara Aithal}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=Vijaya Gupchup |title=Bombay: Social Change |page=166,167 |quote=(page 166)The other intellectual class, the Prabhus were once again subdivided in the Chnadraseniya Kayastha Prabhu and the Pathare Prabhus. (page 167) The Bhandaris were given a permit for the manufacture of liquor but were forbidden to sell their products to castes such as Brahmins and Shenvis and the Prabhus because these were required by their caste laws to abstain from drinking}}</ref>
The CKPs, described as a traditionally well-educated and intellectual group, came into conflict with ] around 300 years ago over their rights to be teachers and scholars. As such they competed with the Brahmins in the 18th and 19th centuries for government jobs.<ref name="mifflin1970">{{cite book |author=Harold Robert Isaacs |url=https://archive.org/details/educationreading0000lind |title=Education: readings in the processes of cultural transmission |publisher=Houghton Mifflin |year=1970 |editor=Harry M. Lindquist |page= |quote=..in this case the particular tradition of a Kshatriya caste called "CKP"(Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu). This group described as an intellectual community came into conflict with the Brahmins at least 300 years ago over their right to be teachers and scholars |url-access=registration}}</ref> They even demanded privileges of the Brahmin order – the rights to conduct the ] rituals (all by themselves) and ''satkarma'' (all six karmas of the Brahmin order) for which they were opposed especially by the ]s.<ref name="sssny1973" /><ref name="sandhyagokhale">{{Cite book |last=Gokhale |first=Sandhya |title=The Chitpwans |date=2008 |publisher=Shubhi Publications |pages=30 |quote= claimed privilege of the traditional Brahmin order, the right to perform Vedic Ritual...in this they were frequently opposed by the Brahmins, especially the Chitpawans}}</ref> ] historians and Professors Emeriti, Milton Israel and N.K Wagle opine about this as follows in their analysis:

] historians and Professors Emeriti, Milton Israel and N.K Wagle opine about this as follows in their analysis:


{{blockquote|The CKP could undertake the six functions (satkarma) because they had the expertise to do so. Aba Parasnis the CKP could easily hold his own and argue intricate points from the ], ] and the ]s in a debate which resulted in his composition of the siddhantavijaya in ].He prepared the ] manual(karmakalpadruma), which was published by Pratapsimha. The CKP as an educated elite therefore, were a serious challenge to the Brahman monopoly of Vedokta.<ref name="MiltonWagle" />{{efn|name=MW168|quote on page 168:The CKP could undertake the six functions (satkarma) because they had the expertise to do so. Aba Parasnis the CKP could easily hold his own and argue intricate points from the vedas,puranas and the dharmasastras in a debate which resulted in his composition of the siddhantavijaya in sanskrit.He prepared the samskara manual(karmakalpadruma), which was published by Pratapsimha. The CKP as an educated elite therefore, were a serious challenge to the Brahman monopoly of Vedokta.}}}} {{blockquote|The CKP could undertake the six functions (satkarma) because they had the expertise to do so. Aba Parasnis the CKP could easily hold his own and argue intricate points from the ], ] and the ]s in a debate which resulted in his composition of the siddhantavijaya in ].He prepared the ] manual(karmakalpadruma), which was published by Pratapsimha. The CKP as an educated elite therefore, were a serious challenge to the Brahman monopoly of Vedokta.<ref name="MiltonWagle" />{{efn|name=MW168|quote on page 168:The CKP could undertake the six functions (satkarma) because they had the expertise to do so. Aba Parasnis the CKP could easily hold his own and argue intricate points from the vedas,puranas and the dharmasastras in a debate which resulted in his composition of the siddhantavijaya in sanskrit.He prepared the samskara manual(karmakalpadruma), which was published by Pratapsimha. The CKP as an educated elite therefore, were a serious challenge to the Brahman monopoly of Vedokta.}}}}


During this period, some prominent CKPs like Pilaji Prabhu Deshpande (the son of Baji Prabhu Deshpande) and Shamji Kulkarni (the son of Raoji Narao Kulkarni) were converted to Islam. The conversion happened after being taken as prisoners in war campaigns. After their escape, conversions back to Hinduism were done using Brahminical rituals performed after authorization by the Brahmins, under the minister "Panditrao". Thus, they were accepted back not only into Hinduism but also the CKP community.<ref name=hw81>{{cite magazine|date= May 1981|title=Hindu Vishva, Volume 16, No.9|page=19|quote=Netaji Palkar, who, on account of his superb valour was known as a second Shivaji Maharaj at his time, was lured by Mirza Jaising into Augrangzeb's services .....he served the Mughal armies under Diler Khan for full seven years...He was not only brought back to Hinduism but was taken back into his own community of Kayasth prabhus...The minister then called a meeing of learned Brahmins and took the convert into Hinduism with religious rites and official sanction. The son of the illustrious Baji Prabhu Deshpande, Pilaji, who was taken Prisoner by the Sidi of Janjira and converted to Islam reverted to Hinduism in this way. Another notable shuddhi was that of Shamji, the son of Raoji Naro Kulkarni...When Shamji escaped and returned to swarajya, he appealed to his community of kayastha prabhu to take him back ...}}</ref><ref name="org74">{{cite journal|title=Organiser, Volume 27|year=1974|page=205|publisher=Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Ltd|quote=Aurangzeb converted Shivaji Maharaj's general Netaji Palkar a Kayastha Prabhoo to Islam and named him Kuli Khan. He sent him to the north west frontier province. Netaji suspected that he would be murdered in the north west by some secret agent of the Emperor.}}</ref> During this period, some prominent CKPs like Pilaji Prabhu Deshpande (the son of Baji Prabhu Deshpande) and Shamji Kulkarni (the son of Raoji Narao Kulkarni) were converted to Islam. The conversion happened after being taken as prisoners in war campaigns. After their escape, conversions back to Hinduism were done using Brahminical rituals performed after authorization by the Brahmins, under the minister "Panditrao". Thus, they were accepted back not only into Hinduism but also the CKP community.<ref name=hw81>{{cite magazine|date= May 1981|title=Hindu Vishva, Volume 16, No.9|page=19|quote=Netaji Palkar, who, on account of his superb valour was known as a second Shivaji Maharaj at his time, was lured by Mirza Jaising into Augrangzeb's services .....he served the Mughal armies under Diler Khan for full seven years...He was not only brought back to Hinduism but was taken back into his own community of Kayasth prabhus...The minister then called a meeing of learned Brahmins and took the convert into Hinduism with religious rites and official sanction. The son of the illustrious Baji Prabhu Deshpande, Pilaji, who was taken Prisoner by the Sidi of Janjira and converted to Islam reverted to Hinduism in this way. Another notable shuddhi was that of Shamji, the son of Raoji Naro Kulkarni...When Shamji escaped and returned to swarajya, he appealed to his community of kayastha prabhu to take him back ...}}</ref><ref name="org74">{{cite journal|title=Organiser, Volume 27|year=1974|page=205|publisher=Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Ltd|quote=Aurangzeb converted Shivaji Maharaj's general Netaji Palkar a Kayastha Prabhoo to Islam and named him Kuli Khan. He sent him to the north west frontier province. Netaji suspected that he would be murdered in the north west by some secret agent of the Emperor.}}</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=The current source is insufficiently reliable (]).|date=January 2024}}


As the Maratha empire/confederacy expanded in the 18th century, and given the nepotism of the Peshwa of Pune towards their own ] caste, CKP and other literal castes migrated for administration jobs to the new Maratha ruling states such as the Bhosale of Nagpur, the ]s, the ], the ]s etc.,<ref name="Caste and Class in Maharashtra" /><ref>{{cite book|last1=Bayly|first1=Susan|title=Caste, society and politics in India from the eighteenth century to the modern age|date=2000|publisher=Cambridge Univ. Press|location=Cambridge |isbn=978-0-521-79842-6|page=79|edition=1. Indian|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HbAjKR_iHogC&pg=PR6}}</ref>
During the Peshwa era, the CKP's main preceptor or Vedic ] was a Brahmin by the name of Abashastri Takle, who was referred to by the CKP community as "Gurubaba". Sale of liquor was banned by the Brahmin administrators to the Brahmins, CKPs, ] and Saraswat Brahmins but there was no objection to other castes drinking it or even to the castes such as Bhandaris from manufacturing it. '']s'' i.e. "dispute involving the supposed violation of the Brahmanical ritual code of behavior" were very common in that era and some Chitpawans, at times, initiated '']'' against other communities – Prabhu communities (CKP, Pathare Prabhu), Saraswats and ].<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Chitpwans |last=Gokhale|first=Sandhya|publisher=Shubhi publications|date=2008|page=204|quote=The jati disputes were not a rare occurrence in Maharashtra. There are recorded instances of disputes between jatis such as Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhus and the Chitpawans, Pathare Prabhus and the Chitpawans, Saraswats and the Chitpawans and Shukla Yajurvedi and the Chitpawans. The intra-caste dispute involving the supposed violation of the Brahmanical ritual code of behavior was called Gramanya in Marathi.}}</ref> They did not come to fruition however. The analysis of ''gramanyas'' against the CKP was done in depth by historians from the ]. Modern scholars quote statements that show that they were due to political malice – especially given that the Gramanya was started by a certain Yamaji Pant who had sent an assassin to murder a rival CKP. This was noted by Gangadharshastri Dikshit who gave his verdict in favor of the CKPs. Abashastri Takle had used the scriptures to establish their "Vedokta". Similarly, the famous jurist ] also supported the CKPs Vedokta. Modern scholars conclude that the fact that the CKPs held high ranking positions in administration and the military and as statesmen was a "double edged sword". Historians, while analyzing the ''gramanyas'' state "As statesmen, they were engulfed in the court intrigues and factions, and, as a result, were prone to persecution by opposing factions. On the other hand, their influence in the court meant that they could wield enough political clout to effect settlements in favor of their caste.". The late Indian professor of sociology, ] commented on the strictness of the caste system during the Peshwa rule in Maharashtra by noting that even advanced caste such as the Prabhus had to establish rights to carry on with the vedic rituals.<ref name="MiltonWagle"/><ref>{{cite book|title=Caste and Race in India|pages=, 14|author=Govind Sadashiv Ghurye|publisher=Popular Prakashan |year=1969|quote=(page 5) Thus the Brahmin government of Poona, while passing some legislation prohibiting the manufacture and sale of liquors, excluded the bhandaris kolis and similar other castes from the operation thereof but strictly forbade the sale of drinks to Brahmins, Shenvis, Prabhus and Government officers (page 14). Such an advanced caste as the Prabhus in the Maratha country had to establish its rights to carry on the rites according to the vedic formulae which were being questioned at the time of the later peshwas|url=https://archive.org/details/casteraceinindia0000ghur|url-access=registration|isbn=9788171542055}}</ref><ref name="Derett">{{cite book|title=Indology and Law: Studies in the Honour or Professor J.Duncan M.Derett|editor1=Gunther-Dietz Sontheimer|editor2=Parameswara Aithal|publisher= Südasien-Institut – Universität Heidelberg|year=1982|page=325|quote=(page 321) Gangadhar Dikshit remarked "The proof in favor of the prabhus vedokta adduced by their preceptor is preponderant. There is no argument against it. Who can, therefore, dare say that the Shastra is false? Their preceptor Gurubaba (Abashastri Takle), indeed, quoting from the scriptures convincingly argued the Prabhus claims to Vedokta before the Pandit assembly by proving their Kshatriya genealogy (page 325). As the prabhus's Gurubaba stated in the Pandit assembly, that the gramanya initiated by Yamaji was due to political malice("rajyakarani dvesha"). It did not therefore, come to fruition. That there was an active enmity between Govindrao, a leading member of the prabhu caste and Yamaji, is clear from a document in which it is stated that Yamaji Pant actually sent an assassin to murder Govindrao. The Prabhus eminence as soldier-statesmen and high ranking administrative officers from Bajiravs time to end of Peshwai was both an asset and a liability. As statesmen, they were engulfed in the court intrigues and factions, and, as a result, were prone to persecution by opposing factions. On the other hand, their influence in the court meant that they could wield enough political clout to effect settlements in favor of their caste.(page 328)It is significant that the two Prabhu Sardars, Nilkanthrav Page and Ravji Apaji were the key members of the faction which helped Bajirav to acquire the Peshwaship.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book| title=Bombay: Social Change | author=Vijaya Gupchup|page=166,167|quote=(page 166)The other intellectual class, the Prabhus were once again subdivided in the Chnadraseniya Kayastha Prabhu and the Pathare Prabhus. (page 167) The Bhandaris were given a permit for the manufacture of liquor but were forbidden to sell their products to castes such as Brahmins and Shenvis and the Prabhus because these were required by their caste laws to abstain from drinking}}</ref>


As the Maratha empire/confederacy expanded in the 18th century, and given the nepotism of the Peshwa of Pune towards their own ] caste, CKP and other literal castes migrated for administration jobs to the new Maratha ruling states such as the Bhosale of Nagpur, the ]s, the ], the ]s etc.,<ref name="Caste and Class in Maharashtra"/><ref>{{cite book|last1=Bayly|first1=Susan|title=Caste, society and politics in India from the eighteenth century to the modern age|date=2000|publisher=Cambridge Univ. Press|location=Cambridge |isbn=978-0-521-79842-6|page=79|edition=1. Indian|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HbAjKR_iHogC&pg=PR6}}</ref>
The Gaekwads of ] and the Bhosale of ] gave preference to CKPs in their administration.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Gordon|first1=Stewart|title=The Marathas 1600–1818|date=1993|publisher=Cambridge University|location=New York|isbn=9780521268837|page=145|edition=1. publ.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iHK-BhVXOU4C&pg=PR9}}</ref> The Gaekwads of ] and the Bhosale of ] gave preference to CKPs in their administration.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Gordon|first1=Stewart|title=The Marathas 1600–1818|date=1993|publisher=Cambridge University|location=New York|isbn=9780521268837|page=145|edition=1. publ.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iHK-BhVXOU4C&pg=PR9}}</ref>


Line 72: Line 69:
During the British colonial era, the two literate communities of Maharashtra, namely the Brahmins and the CKP were the first to adopt western education with enthusiasm and prospered with opportunities in the colonial administration. A number of CKP families also served the semi-independent ] in Maharashtra and other regions of India, such as Baroda.<ref>{{cite book|editor-last1=Gulati|editor-first1=Leela|editor-last2=Bagchi|editor-first2=Jasodhara|last=Mehta|first=Vijaya|title=A space of her own : personal narratives of twelve women|date=2005|publisher=SAGE|location=London|isbn=9780761933151|page=181|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HdzF06JsGyMC&pg=PA181}}</ref>{{Full citation needed|date=June 2017}} During the British colonial era, the two literate communities of Maharashtra, namely the Brahmins and the CKP were the first to adopt western education with enthusiasm and prospered with opportunities in the colonial administration. A number of CKP families also served the semi-independent ] in Maharashtra and other regions of India, such as Baroda.<ref>{{cite book|editor-last1=Gulati|editor-first1=Leela|editor-last2=Bagchi|editor-first2=Jasodhara|last=Mehta|first=Vijaya|title=A space of her own : personal narratives of twelve women|date=2005|publisher=SAGE|location=London|isbn=9780761933151|page=181|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HdzF06JsGyMC&pg=PA181}}</ref>{{Full citation needed|date=June 2017}}


The British era of the 1800s and 1900s saw the publications dedicated to finding sources of CKP history<ref name="divekar1978">Divekar, V.D., 1978. Survey of Material in Marathi on the Economic and Social History of India—3. The Indian Economic & Social History Review, 15(3), pp.375–407.</ref> The book ''Prabhu Kul Deepika'' gives the ]s (] name) and ] etc. of the CKP caste. Another publication, ''Kayastha-mitra'' (Volume 1, No.9. Dec 1930) gives a list of north Indian princely families that belonged to the CKP caste.<ref name="divekar81">{{cite book | author = V.D Divekar| title = Survey of Material in Marathi on the Economic and Social History of India |publisher = Bharata Itihasa Samshodhaka Mandala|page =61|year = 1981|quote=On the historical information relating to Chandraseneeya Kayastha Prabhus (known popularly as &dquo;C.K.P.s&dquo;) we have a good book published from Baroda (no publication date) under the title Prabhu-kul-deepika. The book gives detailed information about the Gotras, Pravaras, allied caste names, surnames, etc., of the members of the C.K.P. caste. R.R. Pradhan, in an issue of Kayastha-mitra (Vol. 1, No. 9, December 1930, pp. 2-3) gives a list of north Indian princely families that belonged to the C.K.P. caste. We may mention here two such publications: Chandraseneeya Kayastha Prabhunchd itihas dni Sans-theche patrak (Baroda, 1891); and, Chdndraseneeya Kdyastha Prabhu samci-jachyd itihäsáche digdarshan, by R.N. Pradhan (Baroda, 1918). Seetanandan has compiled a detailed list of authors belonging to the C.K.P. caste}}</ref>
The British era of the 1800s and 1900s saw the publications dedicated to finding sources of CKP history<ref name="divekar1978">Divekar, V.D., 1978. Survey of Material in Marathi on the Economic and Social History of India—3. The Indian Economic & Social History Review, 15(3), pp.375–407.</ref>

The book ''Prabhu Kul Deepika'' gives the ]s (] name) and ] etc. of the CKP caste.
The CKPs competed with the Brahmins in the 18th and 19th centuries for government jobs.{{Citation needed|date=January 2024}}
Another publication, ''Kayastha-mitra'' (Volume 1, No.9. Dec 1930) gives a list of north Indian princely families that belonged to the CKP caste.
<ref name="divekar81">{{cite book | author = V.D Divekar| title = Survey of Material in Marathi on the Economic and Social History of India |publisher = Bharata Itihasa Samshodhaka Mandala|page =61|year = 1981|quote=On the historical information relating to Chandraseneeya Kayastha Prabhus (known popularly as &dquo;C.K.P.s&dquo;) we have a good book published from Baroda (no publication date) under the title Prabhu-kul-deepika. The book gives detailed information about the Gotras, Pravaras, allied caste names, surnames, etc., of the members of the C.K.P. caste. R.R. Pradhan, in an issue of Kayastha-mitra (Vol. 1, No. 9, December 1930, pp. 2-3) gives a list of north Indian princely families that belonged to the C.K.P. caste. We may mention here two such publications: Chandraseneeya Kayastha Prabhunchd itihas dni Sans-theche patrak (Baroda, 1891); and, Chdndraseneeya Kdyastha Prabhu samci-jachyd itihäsáche digdarshan, by R.N. Pradhan (Baroda, 1918). Seetanandan has compiled a detailed list of authors belonging to the C.K.P. caste}}</ref>


], the CKP representative of the deposed Raja Pratapsinh Bhosale of Satara spent 13 years in London in the 1840s and 50s to plead for restoration of the ruler without success. At the time of the ], Rango tried to raise a rebel force to fight the British but the plan was thwarted and most of the conspirators were executed. However, Rango Bapuji escaped from his captivity and was never found.<ref>{{cite book|editor-last1=Bates|editor-first1=Crispin|last=Naregal|first=Veena|title=Mutiny at the margins : new perspectives on the Indian uprising of 1857.|date=2013|publisher=SAGE|location=Los Angeles|isbn=9788132109709|pages=167–186}}</ref> ], the CKP representative of the deposed Raja Pratapsinh Bhosale of Satara spent 13 years in London in the 1840s and 50s to plead for restoration of the ruler without success. At the time of the ], Rango tried to raise a rebel force to fight the British but the plan was thwarted and most of the conspirators were executed. However, Rango Bapuji escaped from his captivity and was never found.<ref>{{cite book|editor-last1=Bates|editor-first1=Crispin|last=Naregal|first=Veena|title=Mutiny at the margins : new perspectives on the Indian uprising of 1857.|date=2013|publisher=SAGE|location=Los Angeles|isbn=9788132109709|pages=167–186}}</ref>

Revision as of 08:18, 27 January 2024

Ethno-religious clan of South Asia "CKP" redirects here. For the South Korean political party, see Creative Korea Party. For the engine sensor, see Crankshaft position sensor.

Ethnic group
Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu (CKP)
Regions with significant populations
Maharashtra, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Goa
Languages
Marathi, Konkani, Gujarati, Hindi
Religion
Hinduism
Related ethnic groups
Pathare Prabhu, Gaud Saraswat Brahmin

Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu (CKP) or historically and commonly known as Chandraseniya Prabhu or just Prabhu is an ethnic group mainly found in Gujarat and Maharashtra. Historically, they made equally good warriors, statesmen as well as writers. They held the posts such as Deshpande and Gadkari according to the historian, B.R. Sunthankar, produced some of the best warriors in Maharashtrian history.

Traditionally, in Maharashtra, the caste structure was headed by the deshasthas, chitpawans, karhade, saraswats and the CKPs. Other than the Brahmins, the Prabhus (CKPs and Pathare Prabhus) were the communities advanced in education.

Traditionally, the CKPs have the upanayana ( janeu or thread ceremony) and have been granted the rights to study the vedas and perform vedic rituals along with the Brahmins. The CKP performed three Vedic karmas or duties which in sanskrit are called: Adhyayan- studying of the Vedas, yajna- ritual done in front of a sacred fire, often with mantras and dāna – alms or charity. Ritually ranked high (along with the Brahmins), the caste may be considered socially proximate to the Brahmin community. They have traditionally been an elite and literate but a numerically small community.

More formally, in Maharashtra, they are one of the Prabhu Communities and a sister caste of the Pathare Prabhu. The CKP traditionally follow the Advaita Vedanta, as propounded by Adi Shankara.

Etymology

The name Chandraseniya may be a corruption of the word Chandrashreniya, meaning from the valley of the Chenab River (also known as "Chandra"). This theory states that the word Kayastha originates from the term Kaya Desha, an ancient name for the region around Ayodhya. The word Prabhu means Lord or a Chief in Sanskrit language.

History

Origin

The CKP claim descent from Chandrasen, an ancient kshatriya king of Ujjain and Ayodhya and of the Haihaya family of the lunar Kshatriya Dynasty.

High medieval period

During the times of the Shilahara dynasty of Konkan (around the 10th century), the Silhara kings were known to invite for settlement into their lands, Brahmins and Kshatriyas of the northern Indo-Gangetic valley. These are the Goud Saraswat Brahmin and the CKP. In fact, epigraphical evidences i.e. engravings from the Shilahara times have been found in Deccan to prove that many CKPs held high posts and controlled the civilian and military administration. For example, a Shilahara inscription around A.D. 1088 mentions the names of a certain Velgi Prabhu. Lakshmana Prabhu is mentioned as a MahaDandanayaka (head of military) and MahaPradhana (prime minister); Ananta-Prabhu is mentioned as a MahaPradhana (prime minister), Kosadhikari (Head of treasury) and Mahasandhivigrahika (charge of foreign department). According to Historian and researcher S.Muley, these epigraphs might be the first available evidences of the existence of the CKP in Maharashtra.

Kayastha dynasty's kings Gangaya Sahini, Jannigadeva, Tripurarideva and Ambadeva Kayastha were CKPs claiming Kshatriya varna ruled over vast swathes of land in Andhra country, and they are recorded in Andhra history dating back to the 13th century CE.

According to a letter written by the Shankaracharya, who confirmed the 'Vedadhikar' of the CKPs, the title Prabhu, which means high official, must have been given to the CKPs by the Shilahar kings of Konkan.

The Shankaracharya has also formally endorsed their Kshatriya status by citing various sanskrit scriptures; especially one scripture that explicitly called them Chandraseniya Kshatriyas. He also cited documents from Banares and Pune Brahmins ratified by Bajirao II himself that proved their rights over the Vedas. His letter is addressed to all Brahmins.

According to the American Indologist and scholar of Religious Studies and South Asian Studies who is the Professor of International Studies and Comparative Religion at the University of Washington, Christian Lee Novetzke

In the thirteenth century they might have been considered as equal to brahmin or simply within the Brahminic ecumene, this despite the fact that modern day CKPs of Maharashtra understand themselves to have arisen from the Kshatriya varna. Thus they are an intermediate caste between brahmins and Kshatriyas.

Deccan sultanate and Maratha Era

The CKP community became more prominent during the Deccan sultanates and Maratha rule era. During Adilshahi and Nizamshahi, CKP, the Brahmins and high status Maratha were part of the elites. Given their training CKP served both as civilian and military officers. Several of the Maratha Chhatrapati Shivaji's generals and ministers, such as Murarbaji Deshpande and Baji Prabhu Deshpande, and Khando Ballal Chitnis were CKPs.

In 17th-century Maharashtra, during Shivaji's time, the so-called higher classes i.e. the Marathi Brahmins, CKPs and Saraswat Brahmins, due to social and religious restrictions were the only communities that had a system of education for males. Except these three castes, education for all other castes and communities was very limited and consisted of listening to stories from religious texts like the Puranas or to Kirtans and thus the common masses remained illiterate and backward. Hence Shivaji was compelled to use people from these three educated communities – Marathi Brahmins, CKPs and Saraswat Brahmins – for civilian posts as they required education and intellectual maturity. However, in this time period, these three as well as other communities, depending on caste, also contributed their share to Shivaji's "Swaraj"(self-rule) by being cavalry soldiers, commanders, mountaineers, seafarers etc.

Varna dispute and gramanya

The CKPs, described as a traditionally well-educated and intellectual group. They claimed themselves as Kshatriyas, while predominant regional Brahmin belief was that they were Sudras. They even demanded privileges of the Brahmin order – the rights to conduct the vedic rituals (all by themselves) and satkarma (all six karmas of the Brahmin order) for which they were opposed especially by the Chitpawans. The dispute regarding the varna status of them broke out a few years before Shivaji’s coronation. At times, there were Gramanyas, i.e. "dispute involving the supposed violation of the Brahmanical ritual code of behavior" also known as "Vedokta disputes", initiated by certain individuals who tried to stop CKP rights to Upanayana. These individuals based their opinion on the belief that no true Kshatriyas existed in the Kali Yuga; however the upanayana for CKPs were supported by prominent Brahmin arbitrators like Gaga Bhatt and Ramshastri Prabhune who gave decisions in the favor of the community. Just after the death of Shivaji this dispute raised again but his time the opinion shifted against the views of Gangabhatta. During the Peshwa era, the CKP's main preceptor or Vedic Guru was a Brahmin by the name of Abashastri Takle, who was referred to by the CKP community as "Gurubaba". Sale of liquor was banned by the Brahmin administrators to the Brahmins, CKPs, Pathare Prabhus and Saraswat Brahmins but there was no objection to other castes drinking it or even to the castes such as Bhandaris from manufacturing it. Gramanyas were very common in that era and some Chitpawans, at times, initiated Gramanya against other communities – Prabhu communities (CKP, Pathare Prabhu), Saraswats and Shukla Yajurvedis. They did not come to fruition however. The gramanya during the Peshwa eras finally culminated in the favor of the CKPs as the Vedokta had support from the Shastras and this was affirmed by two letters from Brahmins from Varanasi as well as one from Pune Brahmins ratified by Bajirao II himself. In the final Gramanya, started by Neelkanthashastri and his relative Balaji Pant Natu, a rival of the CKP Vedic scholar V.S.Parasnis at the court of Satara, the Shankaracharya himself intervened as arbiter and he gave his verdict by fully endorsing the rights over Vedas for the CKP. The Shankaracharya's letter is addressed to all Brahmins and he refers to various Shastras, earlier verdicts in the favour of the CKPS as well as letters about the lineage of the CKP to make his decision and void the dispute started by Natu. Modern scholars quote statements that show that they were due to political malice – especially given that the Gramanya was started by a certain Yamaji Pant who had sent an assassin to murder a rival CKP. This was noted by Gangadharshastri Dikshit who gave his verdict in favor of the CKPs. Abashastri Takle had used the scriptures to establish their "Vedokta". Similarly, the famous jurist Ramshastri Prabhune also supported the CKPs Vedokta.

The analysis of gramanyas against the CKP was done in depth by historians from the University of Toronto. Modern scholars conclude that the fact that the CKPs held high ranking positions in administration and the military and as statesmen was a "double edged sword". Historians, while analyzing the gramanyas state "As statesmen, they were engulfed in the court intrigues and factions, and, as a result, were prone to persecution by opposing factions. On the other hand, their influence in the court meant that they could wield enough political clout to effect settlements in favor of their caste.". The late Indian professor of sociology, Govind Sadashiv Ghurye commented on the strictness of the caste system during the Peshwa rule in Maharashtra by noting that even advanced caste such as the Prabhus had to establish rights to carry on with the vedic rituals.

University of Toronto historians and Professors Emeriti, Milton Israel and N.K Wagle opine about this as follows in their analysis:

The CKP could undertake the six functions (satkarma) because they had the expertise to do so. Aba Parasnis the CKP could easily hold his own and argue intricate points from the vedas, puranas and the dharmasastras in a debate which resulted in his composition of the siddhantavijaya in sanskrit.He prepared the sanskara manual(karmakalpadruma), which was published by Pratapsimha. The CKP as an educated elite therefore, were a serious challenge to the Brahman monopoly of Vedokta.

During this period, some prominent CKPs like Pilaji Prabhu Deshpande (the son of Baji Prabhu Deshpande) and Shamji Kulkarni (the son of Raoji Narao Kulkarni) were converted to Islam. The conversion happened after being taken as prisoners in war campaigns. After their escape, conversions back to Hinduism were done using Brahminical rituals performed after authorization by the Brahmins, under the minister "Panditrao". Thus, they were accepted back not only into Hinduism but also the CKP community.

As the Maratha empire/confederacy expanded in the 18th century, and given the nepotism of the Peshwa of Pune towards their own Chitpavan Brahmin caste, CKP and other literal castes migrated for administration jobs to the new Maratha ruling states such as the Bhosale of Nagpur, the Gaekwads, the Scindia, the Holkars etc., The Gaekwads of Baroda and the Bhosale of Nagpur gave preference to CKPs in their administration.

In 1801–1802 CE (1858 Samvat), a Pune-based council of 626 Brahmins from Maharashtra, Karnataka and other areas made a formal declaration that the CKPs are twice-born (upper caste) people who are expected to follow the thread ceremony (munja).

British era and later

During the British colonial era, the two literate communities of Maharashtra, namely the Brahmins and the CKP were the first to adopt western education with enthusiasm and prospered with opportunities in the colonial administration. A number of CKP families also served the semi-independent princely states in Maharashtra and other regions of India, such as Baroda.

The British era of the 1800s and 1900s saw the publications dedicated to finding sources of CKP history The book Prabhu Kul Deepika gives the gotras (rishi name) and pravaras etc. of the CKP caste. Another publication, Kayastha-mitra (Volume 1, No.9. Dec 1930) gives a list of north Indian princely families that belonged to the CKP caste.

The CKPs competed with the Brahmins in the 18th and 19th centuries for government jobs.

Rango Bapuji Gupte, the CKP representative of the deposed Raja Pratapsinh Bhosale of Satara spent 13 years in London in the 1840s and 50s to plead for restoration of the ruler without success. At the time of the Indian rebellion of 1857, Rango tried to raise a rebel force to fight the British but the plan was thwarted and most of the conspirators were executed. However, Rango Bapuji escaped from his captivity and was never found.

When the prominent Marathi historian Vishwanath Kashinath Rajwade contested their claimed Kshatriya status in a 1916 essay, Prabodhankar Thackeray objected to Rajwade's assumptions and wrote a text outlining the identity of the caste, and its contributions to the Maratha empire. In this text, Gramanyachya Sadhyant Itihas, he wrote that the CKPs "provided the cement" for Shivaji's swaraj (self-rule) "with their blood".

Gail Omvedt concludes that during the British era, the overall literacy of Brahmins and CKP was overwhelmingly high as opposed to the literacy of others such as the Kunbis and Marathas for whom it was strikingly low.

In 1902, all communities other than Marathi Brahmins, Saraswat Brahmins, Prabhus (Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhus, Pathare Prabhus) and Parsi were considered backward and 50% reservation was provided for them in by the princely state of Kolhapur. In 1925, the only communities that were not considered backward by the British Government in the Bombay Presidency were Brahmins, CKP, Pathare Prabhus, Marwaris, Parsis, Banias and Christians.

In Pune, the descendents of Sakharam Hari Gupte donated premises for conducting thread ceremonies and marriages for the members of the CKP community and the facilities were available to other communities as well.

According to the studies by D.L.Sheth, the former director of the Center for the Study of Developing Societies in India (CSDS), educated upper castes and communities – Punjabi Khatris, Kashmiri Pandits, CKPs, the Chitpawans, Nagar Brahmins, South Indian Brahmins, Bhadralok Bengalis, etc., along with the Parsis and upper crusts of the Muslim and Christian society were among the Indian communities in 1947, at the time of Indian independence, that constituted the middle class and were traditionally "urban and professional" (following professions like doctors, lawyers, teachers, engineers, etc.). According to P. K. Varma, "education was a common thread that bound together this pan Indian elite" and almost all the members of these communities could read and write English and were educated "beyond school"

Culture

The mother tongue of most of the community is now Marathi, though in Gujarat they also communicate with their neighbours in Gujarati, and use the Gujarati script, while those in Maharashtra speak English and Hindi with outsiders, and use the Devanagari script.

According to anthropologist Iravati Karve, their "ways of living, dress, worship, cremation" are exactly like those of the Brahmins except that they are not necessarily vegetarian.

The CKPs have traditionally been placed in the Kshatriya varna. They performed three "vedic karmas"(studying vedas, fire sacrifice, giving alms) as opposed to full("Shatkarmi") Brahmins who performed six vedic duties which also include accepting gifts, teaching Vedas to other and performing vedic rites for others. They also followed rituals, like the sacred thread (Janeu) ceremony, the observation of the period of mourning and seclusion by person of a deceased's lineage by the CKPs has traditionally been for 10 days although Kshatriyas generally observe it for 12 days. Educationally and professionally, 20th century research showed that the Saraswat, CKP, Deshastha and Chitpawan were quite similar. Researcher and professor Dr.Neela Dabir sums it up as follows "In Maharashtra for instance, the family norms among the Saraswat Brahmins and CKPs were similar to those of the Marathi Brahmins". However, she also criticizes these communities by concluding that until the 20th century, the Marathi Brahmin, CKP and Saraswat Brahmin communities, due to their upper-caste ritualistic norms, traditionally discouraged widow remarriage. This resulted in distress in the lives of widows from these castes as opposed to widows from other Marathi Hindu castes.

They worship Ganesh, Vishnu and other Hindu gods. Many are devotees of Sai Baba of Shirdi. Some CKPs may also be devotees of the religious swamis from their own caste – "Ram Maruti Maharaj(Deshpande)". and "Gajanan Maharaj (Gupte)", who took samadhis at Kalyan (in 1919) and Nasik (in 1946) respectively. Many CKP clans have Ekvira temple at Karle as their family deity whereas others worship Vinzai, Kadapkarin, Janani as their family deity

CKPs have had a progressive attitude regarding female education compared to other communities. For example, Dr.Christine Dobbin's research concludes that the educationally advanced communities in the 1850s – the CKPS, Pathare Prabhus, Saraswats, Daivadnya and the Parsis were the first communities in the Bombay Presidency that allowed female education.

Notable people

References

Notes

  1. ^ quote on page 168:The CKP could undertake the six functions (satkarma) because they had the expertise to do so. Aba Parasnis the CKP could easily hold his own and argue intricate points from the vedas,puranas and the dharmasastras in a debate which resulted in his composition of the siddhantavijaya in sanskrit.He prepared the samskara manual(karmakalpadruma), which was published by Pratapsimha. The CKP as an educated elite therefore, were a serious challenge to the Brahman monopoly of Vedokta.
  2. Omvedt does add a proviso saying that :There is difficulty in using such Census data, particularly because the various categories tended to be defined in different ways in different years, and different criteria were used in different provinces for classifying the population. Nonetheless, the overall trend is clear
  3. quote from page 14: Rubbing shoulders with the portraits of the Gods and Goddesses would be pictures of Ram Maruti Maharaj or Gajanan Maharaj(both CKP Swamis, whose samadhis are at Kalyan and Nasik respectively)....Almost every C K.P home will have either a coloured or a black-and-white portrait of Sai Baba of Shirdi...

Citations

  1. Commissioner, India Census (1903). Census of India, 1901. Printed at the Government central Press.
  2. Jogendra Nath Bhattacharya (1896). Hindu Castes And Sects.
  3. Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu Social Club, Poona; Gupte, T. V. (1904). Ethnographical notes on Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu. University of California Libraries. Poona.
  4. ^ B. R. Sunthankar (1988). Nineteenth Century History of Maharashtra: 1818–1857. p. 121. The Kayastha Prabhus, though small in number, were another caste of importance in Maharashtra. The Konkan districts were their homeland. They formed one of the elite castes of Maharashtra. They also held the position of Deshpandes and Gadkaris and produced some of the best warriors in the Maratha history
  5. ^ K.P.Bahadur, Sukhdev Singh Chib (1981). The Castes, Tribes and Culture of India. ESS Publications. p. 161. pg 161: The Kayastha Prabhus...They performed three of the vedic duties or karmas, studying the Vedas adhyayan, sacrificing yajna and giving alms or dana...The creed mostly accepted by them is that of the advaita school of Adi Shankaracharya, though they also worship Vishnu, Ganapati and other gods. ...Most of the Pathare Prabhus are the followers of smart sect who adopt the teachings of Shankaracharya
  6. Sharmila Rege (2013). Writing Caste/Writing Gender: Narrating Dalit Women's Testimonies. Zubaan Books. p. 28. ISBN 978-93-83074-67-9. The traditional caste hierarchy was headed by the brahmin castes-the deshasthas, chitpawans, karhades saraswats and the chandraseniya kayastha prabhus.
  7. Sulabha Brahme, Ashok Upadhyaya (2004). Agrarian structure, movements & peasant organisations in India, Volume 2. V.V. Giri National Labour Institute. p. 29. ISBN 978-81-7827-064-7. Besides Brahmins, the other communities advanced in education are Kayastha Prabhu, Pathare Prabhu found mainly in the...
  8. ^ KS Singh (1998). India's communities. Oxford University Press. p. 2083. ..the Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu observe the thread-wearing (janeu) ceremony for male children. They cremate the dead and observe death pollution for ten days.
  9. Pran Nath Chopra (1982). Religions and communities of India. Vision Books. p. 98. ISBN 9780391027480. Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu They have the Upanayana ceremony and are Vedadhikaris ( having the right to read the Vedas )
  10. ^ Milton Israel and N.K.Wagle, ed. (1987). Religion and Society in Maharashtra. Center for South Asian Studies, University of Toronto, Canada. pp. 147–170.
  11. André Béteille (1992). Society and Politics in India: Essays in a Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press. p. 48. ISBN 0195630661. Although the Chandraseniya Kayasth Prabhu are non-Brahmins, they rank very high and might be regarded as being socially proximate to the Koknasth Brahman.
  12. Kurtz, Donald (1 August 1997). Book Contradictions and Conflict: A Dialectical Political Anthropology of a University in Western India (Studies in Human Society, Vol 9). Brill. p. 68. ISBN 978-9004098282. ... CKPs. They represent a small but literate and ritually high caste.
  13. Rosenzweig, Mark; Munshi, Kaivan (September 2006). "Traditional Institutions Meet the Modern World: Caste, Gender, and Schooling Choice in a Globalizing Economy". American Economic Review. 96 (4): 1225–1252. doi:10.1257/aer.96.4.1225. (page 1228)High castes include all the Brahmin jatis, as well as a few other elite jatis (CKP and Pathare Prabhus).Low castes include formerly untouchable and backward castes (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Castes, as defined by the government of India). Medium castes are drawn mostly from the cultivator jatis, such as the Marathas and the Kunbis, as well as other traditional vocations that were not considered to be ritually impure.
  14. Bidyut Chakrabarty (2003). Communal Identity in India: Its Construction and Articulation in the Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press. p. 138. ISBN 978-0-19-566330-3. Of the six groups, four are Brahmins; one is high non-Brahmin caste, Chandraseniya Kayashth Prabhu (CKP), ranking next only to the Brahmins; and the other is a cultivating caste, Maratha (MK), belonging to the middle level of the hierarchy.
  15. ^ Champa Aphale (1976). Growing Up in an Urban Complex. National Publishing House. p. 5. advanced castes among the maharashtrians viz.Brahmins. In this groups were also included families belonging to the chandraseniya kayastha prabhu besides the three subscastes among the brahmins, viz. Kokanastha Brahmins, Deshastha Brahmins and Saraswat Brahmins. The reason for this was that, though non-Brahmins, these C.K.P. families were very much near the Brahmin families as regards their educational and occupational status.
  16. V. B. Ghuge (1994). Rajarshi Shahu: a model ruler. kirti prakashan. p. 20. In the Hindu social hierarchy the privileged classes were Brahmins, CKP's and others. Similarly other elite classes were Parsis and Europeans.
  17. ^ Donald B. Rosenthal (1973). "From Reformist Princes to 'Co-operative Kings". Special Studies Series, State University of New York. Buffalo, N.Y. Council on International Studies, State University of New York at Buffalo: 7.
  18. Rosenthal, Donald (19 May 1973). "From Reformist Princes to 'Co-operative Kings': I: Political Change in Pre-Independence Kolhapur". Economic and Political Weekly. 8 (20): 903–910. JSTOR 4362649. (page 905)Within the circle of "available" non-Brahman elite groups one might also count the tiny community of CKP's Chandrasenya Kayastha Prabhu...A community which claimed status equal to Brahmans-a claim which the Brahmans always stridently rejected – the CKP's were a source of men of talent who were to act as advisors to Shahu...
  19. Christine E. Dobbin (1972). Urban leadership in Western India: politics and communities in Bombay city, 1840–1885. Oxford University Press. p. 225. ISBN 9780198218418. Not only were the Pathare prabhus aware for the need for self help. In 1876 the members of their sister community, the Chandraseniya Kyasth Prabhus, began to organize themselves.
  20. Vijaya Gupchup. Bombay: Social Change 1813–1857. p. 166. The other intellectual class, the Prabhus were once again subdivided in the Chnadraseniya Kayastha Prabhu and the Pathare Prabhus
  21. Pran Nath Chopra (1982). Religions and communities of India. Vision Books. p. 88. ISBN 9780391027480. Retrieved 31 March 2013.
  22. "Definition of PRABHU". www.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
  23. Sharad Hebalkar (2001). Ancient Indian ports: with special reference to Maharashtra. p. 87.
  24. Lucy Carol Stout (1976). The Hindustani Kayasthas : The Kayastha Pathshala, and the Kayastha Conference. University of California, Berkeley. p. 17.
  25. S.Muley,M.A.,PhD (1972). Studies in the Historical and cultural geography and ethnography of the Deccan. Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute, University of Poona. pp. 301, 303, 304. " pg 301: (section)Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu...From our epigraphical evidences, many Prabhus seem to have held high posts in the Silahara kingdom, and controlled the civil and military administration. The Chaul inscription of AD.1088 mentions Veliga Prabhu. Ananta Prabhu and Lakshamana Prabhu appear in a number of records. The former was a MahaPradhana, Kosadhikari, MahasandhiVigrahika and the latter was a MahaPradhana and Mahadandanayaka. Table on Pg 303,304: minister: pradhana, head of treasury: kosadhikari, foreign department charge: Mahasandhivigrahika, head of military: MahaDandanayaka{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  26. Christian Lee Noverzke (2016). The Qutodian revolution : Vernacularization, Religion, and the Premodern Public Sphere in India, part 2. Columbia University Press. p. 159.
  27. ^ Pandit, Nalini (1979). "Caste and Class in Maharashtra". Economic and Political Weekly. 14 (7/8 (February 1979)): 425–436. JSTOR 4367360.
  28. Balkrishna Govind Gokhale (1988). Poona in the eighteenth century: an urban history. Oxford University Press. p. 112. ISBN 978-0-19-562137-2. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
  29. Kantak, M. R. (1978). "The Political Role of Different Hindu Castes and Communities in Maharashtra in the Foundation of the Shivaji Maharaj's Swarajya". Bulletin of the Deccan College Research Institute. 38 (1): 44,47. JSTOR 42931051. (page 44) Next to the Brahmins came the Saraswats and the Kayastha Prabhus. Except the Brahmins, the saraswats and the kayasthas, all other castes and communities in Maharashtra received very little education, which was the sole privilege of the higher castes.(page 47)A charge may be leveled against Shivaji Maharaj that he recruited in his civil departments the people from the so called intellectual classes only. It is a fact that Shivaji Maharaj's civil services were dominated by the Brahmins, the Prabhus and the Saraswats. However, the blame on it does not fall on Shivaji Maharaj but on the social framework within which he was workings. As has been pointed out earlier in this article , in 17th century Maharashtra, due to social and religious restrictions, education was the privilege of the higher classes only. Consequently, the common masses remained illiterate and backward. For civil posts, intellectual maturity, some standard of education as well as knowledge of reading, writing and account keeping ,etc. were essential. Shivaji Maharaj found these requisites readily in the Brahmins, the Saraswats and the Kayasthas which were the only educated classes then. Shivaji Maharaj had no alternative but to recruit them in his services for maintaining a high standard of efficiency.
  30. ^ Deshpande, Madhav (1 January 2010). "Ksatriyas in the Kali Age? Gāgābhatta & His Opponents". Indo-Iranian Journal. 53 (2): 95–120. doi:10.1163/001972410X12686674794853. ISSN 0019-7246.
  31. ^ Harold Robert Isaacs (1970). Harry M. Lindquist (ed.). Education: readings in the processes of cultural transmission. Houghton Mifflin. p. 88. ..in this case the particular tradition of a Kshatriya caste called "CKP"(Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu). This group described as an intellectual community came into conflict with the Brahmins at least 300 years ago over their right to be teachers and scholars
  32. Gokhale, Sandhya (2008). The Chitpwans. Shubhi Publications. p. 30. claimed privilege of the traditional Brahmin order, the right to perform Vedic Ritual...in this they were frequently opposed by the Brahmins, especially the Chitpawans
  33. Deshpande, Madhav (1 January 2010). "Ksatriyas in the Kali Age? Gāgābhatta & His Opponents". Indo-Iranian Journal. 53 (2): 95–120. doi:10.1163/001972410X12686674794853. ISSN 0019-7246.
  34. Gokhale, Sandhya (2008). The Chitpwans. Shubhi publications. p. 204. The jati disputes were not a rare occurrence in Maharashtra. There are recorded instances of disputes between jatis such as Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhus and the Chitpawans, Pathare Prabhus and the Chitpawans, Saraswats and the Chitpawans and Shukla Yajurvedi and the Chitpawans. The intra-caste dispute involving the supposed violation of the Brahmanical ritual code of behavior was called Gramanya in Marathi.
  35. Govind Sadashiv Ghurye (1969). Caste and Race in India. Popular Prakashan. pp. 5, 14. ISBN 9788171542055. (page 5) Thus the Brahmin government of Poona, while passing some legislation prohibiting the manufacture and sale of liquors, excluded the bhandaris kolis and similar other castes from the operation thereof but strictly forbade the sale of drinks to Brahmins, Shenvis, Prabhus and Government officers (page 14). Such an advanced caste as the Prabhus in the Maratha country had to establish its rights to carry on the rites according to the vedic formulae which were being questioned at the time of the later peshwas
  36. Gunther-Dietz Sontheimer; Parameswara Aithal, eds. (1982). Indology and Law: Studies in the Honour or Professor J.Duncan M.Derett. Südasien-Institut – Universität Heidelberg. p. 325. (page 321) Gangadhar Dikshit remarked "The proof in favor of the prabhus vedokta adduced by their preceptor is preponderant. There is no argument against it. Who can, therefore, dare say that the Shastra is false? Their preceptor Gurubaba (Abashastri Takle), indeed, quoting from the scriptures convincingly argued the Prabhus claims to Vedokta before the Pandit assembly by proving their Kshatriya genealogy (page 325). As the prabhus's Gurubaba stated in the Pandit assembly, that the gramanya initiated by Yamaji was due to political malice("rajyakarani dvesha"). It did not therefore, come to fruition. That there was an active enmity between Govindrao, a leading member of the prabhu caste and Yamaji, is clear from a document in which it is stated that Yamaji Pant actually sent an assassin to murder Govindrao. The Prabhus eminence as soldier-statesmen and high ranking administrative officers from Bajiravs time to end of Peshwai was both an asset and a liability. As statesmen, they were engulfed in the court intrigues and factions, and, as a result, were prone to persecution by opposing factions. On the other hand, their influence in the court meant that they could wield enough political clout to effect settlements in favor of their caste.(page 328)It is significant that the two Prabhu Sardars, Nilkanthrav Page and Ravji Apaji were the key members of the faction which helped Bajirav to acquire the Peshwaship.
  37. Vijaya Gupchup. Bombay: Social Change. p. 166,167. (page 166)The other intellectual class, the Prabhus were once again subdivided in the Chnadraseniya Kayastha Prabhu and the Pathare Prabhus. (page 167) The Bhandaris were given a permit for the manufacture of liquor but were forbidden to sell their products to castes such as Brahmins and Shenvis and the Prabhus because these were required by their caste laws to abstain from drinking
  38. "Hindu Vishva, Volume 16, No.9". May 1981. p. 19. Netaji Palkar, who, on account of his superb valour was known as a second Shivaji Maharaj at his time, was lured by Mirza Jaising into Augrangzeb's services .....he served the Mughal armies under Diler Khan for full seven years...He was not only brought back to Hinduism but was taken back into his own community of Kayasth prabhus...The minister then called a meeing of learned Brahmins and took the convert into Hinduism with religious rites and official sanction. The son of the illustrious Baji Prabhu Deshpande, Pilaji, who was taken Prisoner by the Sidi of Janjira and converted to Islam reverted to Hinduism in this way. Another notable shuddhi was that of Shamji, the son of Raoji Naro Kulkarni...When Shamji escaped and returned to swarajya, he appealed to his community of kayastha prabhu to take him back ... {{cite magazine}}: Cite magazine requires |magazine= (help)
  39. "Organiser, Volume 27". Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Ltd. 1974: 205. Aurangzeb converted Shivaji Maharaj's general Netaji Palkar a Kayastha Prabhoo to Islam and named him Kuli Khan. He sent him to the north west frontier province. Netaji suspected that he would be murdered in the north west by some secret agent of the Emperor. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  40. Bayly, Susan (2000). Caste, society and politics in India from the eighteenth century to the modern age (1. Indian ed.). Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press. p. 79. ISBN 978-0-521-79842-6.
  41. Gordon, Stewart (1993). The Marathas 1600–1818 (1. publ. ed.). New York: Cambridge University. p. 145. ISBN 9780521268837.
  42. Mehta, Vijaya (2005). Gulati, Leela; Bagchi, Jasodhara (eds.). A space of her own : personal narratives of twelve women. London: SAGE. p. 181. ISBN 9780761933151.
  43. Divekar, V.D., 1978. Survey of Material in Marathi on the Economic and Social History of India—3. The Indian Economic & Social History Review, 15(3), pp.375–407.
  44. V.D Divekar (1981). Survey of Material in Marathi on the Economic and Social History of India. Bharata Itihasa Samshodhaka Mandala. p. 61. On the historical information relating to Chandraseneeya Kayastha Prabhus (known popularly as &dquo;C.K.P.s&dquo;) we have a good book published from Baroda (no publication date) under the title Prabhu-kul-deepika. The book gives detailed information about the Gotras, Pravaras, allied caste names, surnames, etc., of the members of the C.K.P. caste. R.R. Pradhan, in an issue of Kayastha-mitra (Vol. 1, No. 9, December 1930, pp. 2-3) gives a list of north Indian princely families that belonged to the C.K.P. caste. We may mention here two such publications: Chandraseneeya Kayastha Prabhunchd itihas dni Sans-theche patrak (Baroda, 1891); and, Chdndraseneeya Kdyastha Prabhu samci-jachyd itihäsáche digdarshan, by R.N. Pradhan (Baroda, 1918). Seetanandan has compiled a detailed list of authors belonging to the C.K.P. caste
  45. Naregal, Veena (2013). Bates, Crispin (ed.). Mutiny at the margins : new perspectives on the Indian uprising of 1857. Los Angeles: SAGE. pp. 167–186. ISBN 9788132109709.
  46. Prachi Deshpande (2007). Creative Pasts: Historical Memory And Identity in Western India, 1700–1960. Columbia University Press. p. 181. ISBN 978-0-231-12486-7. Retrieved 1 September 2012.
  47. Sen, S.P. (1969). Studies in Modern Indian History: A Regional Survey. Institute of Historical Studies. p. 81. Retrieved 25 January 2024.
  48. Omvedt, Gail (August 1973). "Development of the Maharashtrian Class Structure, 1818 to 1931". Economic and Political Weekly. 8 (31/33): 1418–1419. page 1426:There is difficulty in using such Census data, particularly because the various categories tended to be defined in different ways in different years, and different criteria were used in different provinces for classifying the population. Nonetheless, the overall trend is clear...page 1419:Male literacy rates were much higher than the male and female together, but show the same pattern, as does the literacy in English. Not only were the Brahmans and CKPs overwhelmingly dominant, but maratha kunbi figures were amazingly low, especially for bombay province. Even allowing for the effects of sampling differences, the low rates for the marathas kunbis are striking, and it is noteworthy that many artisan castes were more literate. This also tended to be true in the central provinces-Berar.
  49. André Burguière; Raymond Grew, eds. (2001). The construction of minorities: cases for comparison across time. University of Michigan Press. p. 222. ISBN 978-0472067374. Reservations for backward communities were instituted in Bombay after 1925, when a government resolution defined backward classes as all except for "Brahmins, Prabhus, Marwaris, Parsis, Banias, and Christians."
  50. Richard I. Cashman (1 January 1975). The Myth of the Lokamanya: Tilak and Mass Politics in Maharashtra. University of California Press. p. 116. ISBN 9780520024076. when he issued the resolution of july 26th,1902, reserving, 50% of future vacancies in the kolhapur state service for the members of the "backward classes"The backward castes were considered to be those groups other than the advanced communities, namely the brahmans ,Prabhus, Shenvis and parsis
  51. Vijaya Gupchup. Bombay: Social Change 1813–1857. p. 166,167. (page 167) The Bhandaris were given a permit for the manufacture of liquor but were forbidden to sell their products to castes such as Brahmins and Shenvis and the Prabhus because these were required by their caste laws to abstain from drinking.(page 166) The other intellectual class, the Prabhus were once again subdivided in the Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu and the Pathare Prabhus.
  52. Rajaram Vinayak Oturka. Rajaram Vinayak Oturka (ed.). Poona: Look and Outlook. Municipal Corporation(Pune). p. 133. Sakharam Hari Gupte C. K. P. Karyalaya : The above Karya- laya is situated at 4 Narayan Peth, Poona, on a site secured from the Sardar Ambegavkar family of Baroda on a nominal rent, through the efforts of the C. K. P. Swayamsevak Sangh which also collected donations from members of the C. K. P. community for the construction of the building. The objects of the trust are to promote the educational, moral and cultural welfare of the C. K. P. community. The premises are let out particularly for marriage and thread ceremonies to members of the community and when possible to other communities as well.
  53. Pavan K. Varma (2007). The Great Indian Middle class. Penguin Books. p. 28. ISBN 9780143103257.
  54. Kumar Suresh Singh; Rajendra Behari Lal (2003). People of India: Gujarat. Popular Prakashan. pp. 283–. ISBN 978-81-7991-104-4. Retrieved 12 September 2012.
  55. Kumar Suresh Singh (2004). People of India: Maharashtra. Popular Prakashan. pp. 398–. ISBN 978-81-7991-100-6. Retrieved 12 September 2012.
  56. Karve, I.K. (1968). Maharashtra, Land and Its People. Gazetteer of India. Directorate of Government Printing, Stationery and Publications, Maharashtra State. Retrieved 25 January 2024. During the Maratha fight against Aurangazeb they distinguished themselves as loyal and staurch supporters of Shivaji Sambhaji and Rajaram and made a name as warriors also. They are today mostly government employees, teachers, lawyers, doctors etc. They are an intellectually keen and are a progressive community ...Their way of living, dress, worship, cremation ceremonies are like those of the Brahmins except that they eat fish, fowl and mutton. They are mostly concentrated in the region north of Bombay and are found in great numbers in the cities of Bombay and Poona. Some families are found in the villages near the western Ghats where they hold inam lands.
  57. Kurtz, Donald V. (2009). "The Last Institution Standing: Contradictions and the politics of Domination in an Indian University". Journal of Anthropological Research. 65 (4): 611–640. doi:10.3998/jar.0521004.0065.404. JSTOR 25608264. S2CID 147219376. The CKP jati is resident largely in Maharashtra, holds the varna rank of Kshatria, which commonly, except by some Brahmans, is accorded a caste status equal to that of the Chitpawan Brahmans.
  58. Fritzi-Marie Titzmann (24 October 2019). Xenia Zeiler (ed.). Digital Hinduism. Taylor & Francis. p. 59. ISBN 978-1-351-60732-2. 22.Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu. CKP is a Kshatriya subcaste whose members live predominantly in Maharashtra.
  59. Vijaya Gupchup. Bombay: Social Change, 1813–1857. Popular Book Depot. The Brahmana's six duties (Satakarmas) are studying the Vedas and teaching them, performing rites for himself and for others, giving and accepting gifts. Trikarmi means that one can study the Vedas, perform rites for himself and give gifts.
  60. Bento Graciano D'Souza (1975). Goan Society in Transition: A Study in Social Change. Popular Prakashan. p. 61. The most important of the Konkani caste communities were: (1) The Saraswat Brahmins such as Shenvis, Sastikars, Bardesh- ... They are, therefore, called Trikarmi Brahmins as distinguished from Shatkarmi Brahmins who performed all the six duties
  61. Paul Gwynne (2017). World Religions in Practice: A Comparative Introduction. John Wiley and Sons. p. 146. According to tradition the defilement period differs by class; 10 days for brahmin, 12 days for kshatriya , 15 days for vaishya and one month for shudra.
  62. Dr.Neela Dabir (2000). women in distress. Rawat Publishers. pp. 97, 99.
  63. The illustrated weekly of India, volume 91, part 3. 1970. pp. 6–13.
  64. N.S.Pathak. "Mountain Path – Volume 12 – No.1". T. N. Venkataraman,Sri Ramanasramam, Tiruvannamalai. p. 37. My guru, Sri Gajanan Maharaj Gupte of Nasik (who attained Mahasamadhi in September 1946) was, in 1943, invited by Sri Ramana Maharshi Mandal of Matunga, Bombay, to attend the 63rd birth anniversary celebrations... {{cite magazine}}: Cite magazine requires |magazine= (help)
  65. Zelliot, Eleanor; Berntsen, Maxine (1988). The Experience of Hinduism : essays on religion in Maharashtra. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press. p. 335. ISBN 9780887066627. ckp.
  66. Christine Dobbin (1972). Urban leadership in western India. Oxford University Press. pp. 57–58. ISBN 978-0-19-821841-8.
  67. ^ Kantak, M. R. (1978). "The Political Role of Different Hindu Castes and Communities in Maharashtra in the Foundation of the Shivaji Maharaj's Swarajya". Bulletin of the Deccan College Research Institute. 38 (1): 40–56. JSTOR 42931051.
  68. Relia, Anil (12 August 2014). The Indian Portrait III.
  69. Sen, Sailendra Nath (1961). Anglo-Maratha relations during the administration of Warren Hastings, 1772–1785. Bombay: Popular Prakashan. p. 10. ISBN 978-81-7154-578-0.
  70. ^ Professor Dr.Mrudula Verma; Professor Dr.Sarjerao Bhamare; Professor Shripad Nandedkar; Dr.Mokashi (RK Taleja College) (2015). Sanshodhak. Historian V.K. Rajwade Research center (mandal), Dhule, India. pp. 1–14. quote on page 1; Not much information is available about the early life of Narayan Jagannatha Vaidya. Narayan Jagannatha Vaidya belonged to the Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu (CKP) community of Maharashtra. His brother was the Diwan of Baroda state
  71. ^ The Bombay University Calendar, Volume 2. University of Bombay. 1925. p. 582. Paper for the foundation of a Scholarship to be called " The Dewan Bahadur Lakshman Jagannath Vaidya Scholarship " and to be awarded to a Candidate of the Kayastha Prabhu community who passes the Matriculation Examination with the highest number..
  72. ^ Bombay, University of (1908). The Bombay University Calendar, Volume 1. p. 490. LAKSHMAN. JAGANNATH. VAIDYA. SCHOLARSHIP. The Secretary to the Kayastha Prabhu Educational Fund, Baroda, in a letter dated 2nd February 1887, offered to the University a sum of Rs. 5,000 in Government 4 per cent. Paper for the foundation of a Scholarship to be called " The Dewan Bahadur Lakshman Jagannath Vaidya Scholarship " and to be awarded to a Candidate of the Kayastha Prabhu community who passes the Matriculation Examination with the highest number
  73. ^ J.D.Ranadive (1978). Shri Narayan Jagannatha Vaidya in Amrut. pp. 123–125.
  74. Naregal, Veena (2013). Bates, Crispin (ed.). Mutiny at the margins: new perspectives on the Indian uprising of 1857. Los Angeles: SAGE. pp. 167–186. ISBN 9788132109709.
  75. Surendra Nath Sen (1949). Indian Travels of Thevenot and Careri: Being the Third Part of the Travels of M. de Thevenot Into the Levant and the Third Part of a Voyage Round the World by Dr. John Francis Gemelli Careri.
  76. The Illustrated Weekly of India (1970), volume 91, part 3, page 15.
  77. Dhimatkar, Abhidha (16 October 2010). "The Indian Edison". Economic and Political Weekly. 45 (42): 67–74. JSTOR 20787477.
  78. Nagesh Vasudeo Gunaji. Light on the path of Self Realization(Containing the life-sketch of Shri Gajanana Maharaja). The Popular Book Depot, Grant Road, Bombay – 7. pp. 8, 269. Shri Gajanana Maharaja hails from the Inamdar-Gupte family of Pen, Vasiand other villages in the Colaba District. Towards the middle of the last century the condition of the family began to deteriorate and hence Mr.Murlidhar Bajirao, the father of Gajanan Maharaja, left the district and migrated to Malkapur and sought Government service. Finding that too insufficient to maintaining the family decently, he studied law and after qualifying himself began to practise as a pleader at YeotmalThe eldest son being Narayanrao, who later on became famous as poet, publishing his "Fulanchi Onjal" (Bunch or handful of flower – poems) under the pseudonym "Bee", and the last son being Gajanana Maharaja who forms the subject of this treatise...I am here at Nasik for the last five years or so but it was not until the February of 1937 that I heard about Mr. Gajanan Murlidhar Gupte alias Shri Gajanana Maharaja of Nawa Darwaja, Nasik.I thought to myself "If he be really a saint as said, how is it that for the last five years that I am here in Nasik I did not hear anything about him? Again I have never heard of a real saint belonging to C. K. P. Community except Shree Rama Maruti Maharaja of Kalyan whose fame to the effect is far and wide. He has a Samadhi at Kalyan. His friends and disciples have published abook about the life of the man. How is it that even a single writing about this man did not ever come to my notice ? Who can say, the report is not an exaggeration of the man's qualities?"
  79. Sisir Kumar Das (1991). History of Indian Literature- Western Impact, Indian Response. Sahitya Akademi. p. 324. ISBN 9788172010065.
  80. Nirmala Anant Kanekar (1972). "Bee" Kavi: Charitra wa Kavya-charcha (Marathi biography) (in Marathi). Shri Lekhan Wachan Bhandar, Thokal Bhavan, Laxmi Road, Poona-30. p. 160.
  81. "loksatta". 25 June 2017.
  82. Purandare, Vaibhav (2012). Bal Thackeray & the rise of the Shiv Sena. New Delhi: Roli Books Private limited. ISBN 9788174369581.
  83. "The Illustrated Weekly of India". 91 (3). Bennett, Coleman & Company. July 1970: 12. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  84. Language and Literature. Directorate of Government of Maharashtra State. 1971. p. 119.
  85. "Vanyajāti – Volume 19": 125. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  86. "The Illustrated Weekly of India". 91 (3). Bennett, Coleman & Company. July 1970: 8. (page 8)The Bakhar (diary) written by Anant Malhar Chitnis has proved valuable to historians including Grant Duff. There are renowned C.K.P. historians, too, like V. C. Bendre. His Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj Charitra has won the Maharashtra State Award. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  87. Chitnis, KN (1990). Research Methodology in History. Atlantic Publishers & Dist. ISBN 978-81-7156-121-6.
  88. Rahul Sankrityayana, Naye Bharat ke Naye Neta, 1943, Allahabad, page 327-335
  89. Shailaja Paik (11 July 2014). Dalit Women's Education in Modern India: Double Discrimination. Routledge. ISBN 9781317673309.
  90. Omvedt, Gail (30 January 1994). Dalits and the Democratic Revolution: Dr Ambedkar and the Dalit Movement in Colonial India. SAGE Publications. p. 138. ISBN 9788132119838.
  91. Jayashree Gokhale (1993). From Concessions to Confrontation: The Politics of an Indian Untouchable Community. popular prakashan. p. 91.
  92. Chatterjee, N. (2011). The Making of Indian Secularism: Empire, Law and Christianity, 1830–1960. Springer. p. 66. ISBN 9780230298088.
  93. South Asian intellectuals and social change: a study of the role of vernacular-speaking intelligentsia by Yogendra K. Malik, page 63.
  94. Aruṇa Ṭikekara (2006). The Cloister's Pale: A Biography of the University of Mumbai. Mumbai: Popular Prakashan. p. 105. ISBN 978-81-7991-293-5.
  95. Sumita Mukherjee (2010). Nationalism, Education and Migrant Identities: The England-returned. Oxon: Routledge. p. 129. ISBN 9781135271138.
  96. Ganesh Prabhakar Pradhan (2005). Pursuit of ideals: autobiography of a democratic socialist. p. 88.
  97. "Link – Volume 16, Part 3 – Page 38". United India Periodicals. 1974. {{cite magazine}}: Cite magazine requires |magazine= (help)
  98. "Freedom fighter Datta Tamhane dead". 2014.
  99. ^ "The Illustrated Weekly of India". 91 (3). Bennett, Coleman & Company. July 1970: 14. B.T. Ranadive (b. 1904), a member of the Politbureau of the CPI.(M). Other notable C.K.Ps in this sphere are Mrinal Gore, V. B. Karnik and Datta Tamhane {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  100. ^ Parvati Menon (2004). Breaking Barriers: Stories of Twelve Women. LeftWord Books. p. 10. My family was from the Chandrasena Kayastha Prabhu community, popularly called the CKP community, from which a large number of the social reformers came." Ahilya recalls an event that took place in Malad, where a big satyagraha was organized against untouchability. "My father, although a government servant, gave this campaign all his support.My brother B.T. Ranadive, who was a brilliant student, used to tutor dalit boys when he was at University,...
  101. The Illustrated Weekly of India (1970), volume 91, part 3, page 14
  102. ^ Karandikar. "सीकेपी तितुका मेळवावा!". loksatta. छत्रपती शिवाजी महाराजांचे सेनानी – बाजीप्रभू देशपांडे, मुरारबाजी देशपांडे, बाळाजी आवजी चिटणीस, खंडो बल्लाळ चिटणीस. मराठी साहित्यिक राम गणेश गडकरी, साहित्य संमेलनाच्या पहिल्या स्त्री अध्यक्षा कुसुमावती देशपांडे. अर्थशास्त्रज्ञ चिंतामणराव देशमुख. १९१२ मधील मुंबई हायकोर्टाचे मुख्य न्यायाधीश महादेव भास्कर चौबळ. राजकारणी दत्ता ताम्हाणे, बाळासाहेब ठाकरे, उद्धव ठाकरे, राज ठाकरे. माजी लष्कर प्रमुख अरुणकुमार वैद्य. हवाईदल प्रमुख अनिल टिपणीस. नाट्यसृष्टीच्या सर्वच दालनांच्या सर्वज्ञा विजया मेहता.मराठी आणि हिंदी चित्रपट सृष्टीतील सुमती गुप्ते, शोभना समर्थ, नूतन, तनुजा, नलिनी जयवंत, स्नेहप्रभा प्रधान. विविध २०० प्रकारचे वैज्ञानिक शोध लावणारे आणि ४० पेटंट्स नावावर असलेले आणि ज्यांना भारताचे एडिसन म्हटले जाते ते शास्त्रज्ञ शंकर आबाजी भिसे. संगीतातील फक्त एकच नाव घेतले पुरे आहे ते म्हणजे श्रीनिवास खळे. क्रिकेटपटू बाळू गुप्ते – सुभाष गुप्ते – नरेन ताम्हाणे. १९६५ च्या युद्धात अवघ्या २३ व्या वर्षी शाहिद झालेला लेफ्टनंट दिलीप गुप्ते, पत्रकार माधव गडकरी, आणखी कितीतरी….
  103. ^ Gupte, Pranay (30 December 2010). "Alone and forgotten". The Hindu. Retrieved 29 April 2016.
  104. आधुनिक महाराष्ट्राची जडणघडण : शिल्पकार चरित्रकोश, खंड ३, भाग १, विज्ञान व तंत्रज्ञान, (in Marathi). Saptahik Vivek, 2009. p. 271
  105. Mehta, Vijaya (2005). Gulati, Leela; Bagchi, Jasodhara (eds.). A space of her own : personal narratives of twelve women. London: Sage. p. 181. ISBN 978-0-7619-3315-1.
  106. "Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East". South Asia Bulletin. 16 (2): 116. 1996. Retrieved 15 November 2012.
  107. आधुनिक महाराष्ट्राची जडणघडण : शिल्पकार चरित्रकोश, खंड ३, भाग १, विज्ञान व तंत्रज्ञान, (in Marathi). Saptahik Vivek, 2009. p. 276
  108. Jaffrelot, Christophe (1996). The Hindu Nationalist Movement in India. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-10335-0.
  109. Rob Jenkins (2004) :-Regional Reflections: Comparing Politics along the Region and Communities.Oxford University Press. p. 164. In fact, in the late 1990s and in 2000 the party apparatus was still controlled by upper-caste leaders — either from the faction led by former Chief Minister Sunderlal Patwa (a Jain) and BJP National President Kushabhau Thakre (a Kayasth),or by its opponents , led by Lami Narayan Pandey and former chief minister Kailash Joshi
  110. Christophe Jaffrelote. Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques, 1993 Les nationalistes hindous: idéologie, implantation et mobilisation dès années 1920 aux années 1990. p. 150)."Le cas du Madhya Pradesh En Inde centrale, une des premières zones de force du nationalisme hindou, cette charge fut progressivement confiée à Kushabhau Thakre. Natif de Dhar et de caste kayasth (rough translation of last part: the charge was gradually entrusted to Kushabhau Thakre. Native of Dhar and of caste CKP."
  111. ^ "DnaIndia mumbai report (Dec 2013)".
  112. "Nagpur Today (Nov 2014)".
  113. ^ kule, mukund (14 February 2020). "माझी मुंबई". Maharashtra Times. तर नंतरच्या काळात राम गणेश गडकरी, प्रबोधनकार ठाकरे, सी. डी. देशमुख, १९१२ साली मुंबई हायकोर्टाचे मुख्य न्यायाधीश असलेले महादेव चौबळ, मृणाल गोरे (मूळच्या मोहिले), अहिल्या रांगणेकर, बाळासाहेब ठाकरे, मेजर जनरल अरुणकुमार वैद्य, लेफ्टनंट दिलीप गुप्ते, हवाईदल प्रमुख अनिल टिपणीस, भारताचे एडिसन म्हणून ओळखले जाणारे शास्त्रज्ञ शंकर आबाजी भिसे, दत्ता ताम्हाणे, श्रीनिवास खळे, स्नेहप्रभा प्रधान, शोभना समर्थ, नूतन, नलिनी जयवंत, विजया मेहता अशा किती तरी व्यक्तींनी वेगवेगळ्या क्षेत्रांत सीकेपी समाजाचं नाव रोशन केलेलं आहे.
  114. Sonal Shah (29 June 2014). G. G. Parikh (ed.). "Janata weekly,Vol. 69 No. 22" (PDF). p. 8. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 March 2018. Retrieved 18 March 2018. "Penned by Rohini Gawankar, Mrinal Gore's close friend and colleague of over six decades,it is an inspiring, virtually eyewitness account of one of India's tallest women leaders. ...Of a brave young woman widowed at 30, with a five-year-old daughter, who despite stringent financial circumstances and parental duties fulfilled the dream she and her husband Keshav had set out to achieve. Of a pair of young socialists belonging to different castes, (she, a woman from the Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu caste and medical student; he, a Brahmin and fulltime party worker) {{cite magazine}}: Cite magazine requires |magazine= (help)
  115. Frontline Article on Mrinal Gore
  116. "Veteran social activist Mrinal Gore passes away". The Hindu. 18 July 2012. Retrieved 18 July 2012.
  117. Kamble, Mohan L (2003). "The role of C K P leaders in making of modern Maharashtra". Department of History, Shivaji University: 444, 445. "The Secondary material also shows plenty of information, regarding the subject matter of study which is also referred vigorously. Besides I personally interviewed the following C.K.P. leaders from Bombay and Poona and collected valuable information regarding the features of C.K.P. community and the contribution of previous C.K.P. leaders in making of Modern Maharashtra.1) Prof. G.P. Pradhan, Pune 2) Mr. Ravindra Sabnis, Ex. M.L.A., Kolhapur. 3) Mr. J.A. Deshpande, the advocate of Bombay Highcourt of Bombay. 4) Prof. R.D. Deshpande of Bombay. 5) Mr. Datta Tamhane, Bombay. 6) Mrs. Kusum Pradhan, Bombay. 7) Mr. Narayan Raje 8) Prof. S.D. Gupte 9) Mr. Bhai Vaidya, Pune {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  118. "Janata Weekly" (PDF). p. 2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 December 2018. Retrieved 8 December 2018. In an age of corruption and compromised political ideals, he stood above the squalor of petty realpolitik, maintaining his dignity through his rectitude and near legendary honesty.For last 10 years of his life he fought for free health and education. He is known as an honest politician and a fierce socialist leader/activist who never compromised on his morals and values during his career. He was one of the few prominent survivors of socialist movement in India. {{cite magazine}}: Cite magazine requires |magazine= (help)
  119. आधुनिक महाराष्ट्राची जडणघडण : शिल्पकार चरित्रकोश, खंड ३, भाग १, विज्ञान व तंत्रज्ञान, (in Marathi). Saptahik Vivek, 2009. p. 117
Marathi people
General Communities
Agricultural communities
Mercantile communities
Artisan communities
Priest communities
Tribal communities
Nomadic communities
Jain communities
Immigrant Jain communities
Muslim communities
Other communities
Categories: