| Revision as of 02:15, 4 April 2007 editObscure80 (talk | contribs)50 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:19, 4 April 2007 edit undo67.163.193.239 (talk) →3RRNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| :Dude, relax. I'm not pretending to be an admin. And why not answer the actual question at hand: why are you deleting these links, but feel yours should remain? ] 02:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | :Dude, relax. I'm not pretending to be an admin. And why not answer the actual question at hand: why are you deleting these links, but feel yours should remain? ] 02:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| If you must know, it has very little information on the games for the page it was posted on, unlike the link I added.] 02:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I'm interested to know as well (and whether or not you blank what I say, others can always see it in the history, so your effort is fruitless). you seem to be doing nothing but attack those who disagree with your idea on the link, and hippocratically delete other links out spite.] 02:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:19, 4 April 2007
3RR
Again, regarding your blanking of links without any regard to discussion:
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. Not a dog 00:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I am warning you again-if you do not stop threatening me, I will have to report you. You are not a mod. In fact, a mod came in here and told you to stop. By constantly readding that link, it is you who is warring. If you do not believe fansite links ahould be allowed, then stop readding it.67.163.193.239 01:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- I am not threatening you - these are standard user warning messages that anyone can leave, whether an admin or not. You have not answered my reasonable request (bottom of page) to explain why these links should be removed, but your link added to Rule of Rose. Without any kind of discussion by you on the topic, this appears to be little more than disruption. You can delete your talk page all you want, but the fact remains you appear to be doing this out of spite. Otherwise, you should remove your request to have your fansite added at ROR. Not a dog 01:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Frankly, it is none of your business. You don't even post in that discussion except to try and stir up trouble. For the millionth time, stop harassing me.67.163.193.239 01:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- All editors have concern and interest to make sure this encyclopedia is the best possible, and that the rules & guidelines are properly followed. That's my interest here. Again, I supported inclusion of that link at ROR. But I'm concerned with your subsequent activities. Not a dog 01:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Stop acting like you are a mod and stop harassing me.67.163.193.239 01:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Dude, relax. I'm not pretending to be an admin. And why not answer the actual question at hand: why are you deleting these links, but feel yours should remain? Not a dog 02:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
If you must know, it has very little information on the games for the page it was posted on, unlike the link I added.67.163.193.239 02:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)