| Revision as of 18:02, 1 February 2024 editTucanHolmes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,446 edits A note on language← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:49, 5 March 2024 edit undoBriankharvey (talk | contribs)105 edits →Your edit of The Dispossessed: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| == A quick note on talk page language == | == A quick note on talk page language == | ||
| Hi {{ping|Zilch-nada}}, you seem to be quite liberal in your use of language which belittles your fellow editors. Use of such language is hovering on the edges of what constitutes ], and is generally viewed as unhelpful / non-constructive, especially when expressing differences in opinion. Please reconsider whether this is really necessary to get your point across. ] (]) 18:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC) | Hi {{ping|Zilch-nada}}, you seem to be quite liberal in your use of language which belittles your fellow editors. Use of such language is hovering on the edges of what constitutes ], and is generally viewed as unhelpful / non-constructive, especially when expressing differences in opinion. Please reconsider whether this is really necessary to get your point across. ] (]) 18:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Your edit of The Dispossessed == | |||
| I'm not sure I understand the reasoning behind your removal of "anarchist" in the description in the first sentence. You said "unnecessary labelizing," but I'm not sure what you meant. Do you mean "labelizing" to be derogatory? I think the anarchist ideas are crucial to the novel. Just saying "utopian" admits of capitalist utopias (Star Trek, pretty much), Leninist utopias, mystical or religious utopias (Orson Scott Card), etc. I'd be happy to be convinced, but so far I think what you changed disimproves the article. ] (]) 05:49, 5 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:49, 5 March 2024
Social Credit System
Hi Zilch-nada, I saw you disagreed with my removal of the paragraph you added on said article. Could you please go to the talk page of the article to explain why you think the paragraph belongs? Thanks! Félix An (talk) 01:21, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Redirect blanking
Hi Zilch-nada, I've noticed you blanked a redirect, that isn't really the way delete it if you disagree with it. Instead, nominate it for deletion at WP:RfD. Justiyaya 00:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- My bad. Thanks! Zilch-nada (talk) 00:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I don't know anything about your IP address
But I accept your statement about not making the edit. It wasn't a baseless suggestion though as the intent of the IP's edit and yours was similar, removing sourced material about left-wing terrorism being a relatively minor issue with a bad edit summary - yours saying "changed dismissive, irrelevant wording" when you actually changed nothing but deleted a key statement. Doug Weller talk 07:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
A quick note on talk page language
Hi @Zilch-nada:, you seem to be quite liberal in your use of language which belittles your fellow editors. Use of such language is hovering on the edges of what constitutes acceptable talk page behavior, and is generally viewed as unhelpful / non-constructive, especially when expressing differences in opinion. Please reconsider whether this is really necessary to get your point across. TucanHolmes (talk) 18:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Your edit of The Dispossessed
I'm not sure I understand the reasoning behind your removal of "anarchist" in the description in the first sentence. You said "unnecessary labelizing," but I'm not sure what you meant. Do you mean "labelizing" to be derogatory? I think the anarchist ideas are crucial to the novel. Just saying "utopian" admits of capitalist utopias (Star Trek, pretty much), Leninist utopias, mystical or religious utopias (Orson Scott Card), etc. I'd be happy to be convinced, but so far I think what you changed disimproves the article. Briankharvey (talk) 05:49, 5 March 2024 (UTC)