Revision as of 16:51, 14 February 2024 editQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,116 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:45, 23 February 2024 edit undo80.153.193.146 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== British English? == | |||
While ITIL was started in the |
While ITIL was started in the it has since become an international standard adopted everywhere. Should the article be re-written to remove British English? I'm not sure of the arguments pro or con in this area. --] (]) 17:37, 16 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
:No. Why would any other variety of English be more suitable? --] (]) 17:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC) | :No. Why would any other variety of English be more suitable? --] (]) 17:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
:No; see ] --] (]) 15:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC) | :No; see ] --] (]) 15:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:45, 23 February 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ITIL article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the ITIL v3 page were merged into ITIL. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
While ITIL was started in the it has since become an international standard adopted everywhere. Should the article be re-written to remove British English? I'm not sure of the arguments pro or con in this area. --Jasenlee (talk) 17:37, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
- No. Why would any other variety of English be more suitable? --Michig (talk) 17:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
- No; see MOS:RETAIN --hulmem (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Most of the British English has been removed from the ITIL guidance already. The exams have had all of the language specific to the UK removed for some time now. The reason is very simple, and has already been stated -- it is used around the world. Keeping British colloquialisms and UK-specific spellings of words like "whilst" makes no sense.Flybd5 (talk) 12:55, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
- If you're going to remove 'British English', why not remove French or German whilst you are about it? It makes no sense, as you say, if you can write everything in American. Fustbariclation (talk) 10:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Most of the British English has been removed from the ITIL guidance already. The exams have had all of the language specific to the UK removed for some time now. The reason is very simple, and has already been stated -- it is used around the world. Keeping British colloquialisms and UK-specific spellings of words like "whilst" makes no sense.Flybd5 (talk) 12:55, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ITIL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110912184827/http://www.apmg-international.com/ITILSCRquery.asp to http://www.apmg-international.com/ITILSCRquery.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
External Link to Strategy Management for IT Services (ITSM)
I have observed that Misplaced Pages doesn't have an article on Strategy Management for IT Services (ITSM), listed under Service Strategy Heading.
I have a good article on this topic: Strategy Management for IT Services (ITSM)
As my website is new I'm not putting the link directly in the main article. I'd request other editors to create/improve this Misplaced Pages article with help of the article link given below:
Strategy Management for IT Services (ITSM)
If you found the above article helpful, then please put the link in the main article as external link.--AyanBrahmachary (talk) 10:47, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
ITIL v4: it seems to be "change enablement" rather than "change control"
The article speaks about the "change control" practice in ITIL v4 and states that this name has changed compared to previous versions.
The ITIL Foundation Guide (Limited, AXELOS. ITIL Foundation: ITIL 4 Edition . The Stationery Office Ltd. Kindle Edition.) speaks about "change enablement" rather than "change control".
This may have changed during the development of v4. I'm not closely involved with the ITIL standard, so I didn't just want to make the change in the text without being sure of what really is the definitive term. Ob71 (talk) 13:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages articles that use British English
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class Systems articles
- Mid-importance Systems articles
- Systems articles in systems engineering
- WikiProject Systems articles
- Start-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles