Talk:The Santa Clause (franchise): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 15:10, 18 February 2024 editRandy Kryn (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users284,689 edits →Requested move 8 February 2024: comment← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:09, 18 February 2024 edit undoCrumpled Fire (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users3,300 edits →Requested move 8 February 2024: unsignedNext edit →
Line 20:		Line 20:
	*'''Oppose''' because ] gets more pageviews than ], and I see no evidence that the franchise has "greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term". The TV series article is ], which is plural and makes a difference, like all the varying topics called ] versus the TV series ]. With just two articles actually called "The Santa Clause", and nothing compelling to put the franchise over the original film, I don't see a need to change the status quo. ] (] \| ]) <sup>(])</sup> 13:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)		*'''Oppose''' because ] gets more pageviews than ], and I see no evidence that the franchise has "greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term". The TV series article is ], which is plural and makes a difference, like all the varying topics called ] versus the TV series ]. With just two articles actually called "The Santa Clause", and nothing compelling to put the franchise over the original film, I don't see a need to change the status quo. ] (] \| ]) <sup>(])</sup> 13:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
	*'''Oppose''' per Erik.— ''']'''<small> • '']'' •</small> 23:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)		*'''Oppose''' per Erik.— ''']'''<small> • '']'' •</small> 23:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
	*'''Oppose''', per Erik and the most recognizable use of the term (the first film).		*'''Oppose''', per Erik and the most recognizable use of the term (the first film).<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small>

Revision as of 20:09, 18 February 2024

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 April 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Media franchises Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 8 February 2024

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move

– I think it is better if the franchise page removed the "(franchise)" part. The of the TV show roughly the same as the first film. Ebbedlila (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 05:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Film has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 05:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Disney has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 05:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Support - pretty common way to handle this, per WP:NCFILM#Media franchise. -- Netoholic @ 08:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Oppose because The Santa Clause gets more pageviews than The Santa Clause (franchise), and I see no evidence that the franchise has "greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term". The TV series article is The Santa Clauses, which is plural and makes a difference, like all the varying topics called The American versus the TV series The Americans. With just two articles actually called "The Santa Clause", and nothing compelling to put the franchise over the original film, I don't see a need to change the status quo. Erik (talk | contrib) 13:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Oppose per Erik.— Crumpled Fire • contribs • 23:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Oppose, per Erik and the most recognizable use of the term (the first film).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Randy Kryn (talk • contribs)

Categories: