| Revision as of 17:05, 20 February 2024 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,298,161 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Fastily/Archive 7) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:18, 22 February 2024 edit undoPARAKANYAA (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers43,997 edits →Re: image deletion discussion.: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| Hi, I just created the ] article, and I see that the page has been previously deleted two times. First by {{ping|Materialscientist}} in July 2013, indicating that the article was not notable, and the last time by you in December 2020. I have recreated it, since I think it can be a good addition in Wiki, as it is an important club in the history of a country where sadly football isnt very well covered. Can you please review it and let me know if there is anything I should change. Regards ] (]) 13:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC) | Hi, I just created the ] article, and I see that the page has been previously deleted two times. First by {{ping|Materialscientist}} in July 2013, indicating that the article was not notable, and the last time by you in December 2020. I have recreated it, since I think it can be a good addition in Wiki, as it is an important club in the history of a country where sadly football isnt very well covered. Can you please review it and let me know if there is anything I should change. Regards ] (]) 13:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Re: image deletion discussion. == | |||
| I don't think ] should have been deleted. | |||
| 1) the assertion that it was a press agency image was false, the victim was a child not known before he died and the context and distribution of the image make it clear that it originated from his family, who it is perfectly permissible to use a minimal version of under the project's fair use rules. With cases like these it's often redistributed by agencies, who obviously do not own the copyright. It's also standard to have a picture of the murder victim on their article if one can be found that isn't a press agency image (which this isn't). | |||
| 2) It's also particularly relevant to *this* article, as the victim's young age is what made it so notorious. Without a picture, the impact is lessened. I believe this should be undeleted, and per the advice on image undeletions I was told to ask you. I hope I've made my point well, have a good day. ] (]) 20:18, 22 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:18, 22 February 2024
| This is Fastily's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 5 days  |
Jonathan Kis-Lev
Hi Fastily, four years ago you deletion discussion, a few days ago the entry recreated, John Kiss (artist). Please note that sockpuppet investigtion identified the creator as the artist with multiple accounts.
A self-confessed sock
Hi Fastily, may be interesting – 81.187.192.168 reported it to AIV. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Question
Hello again, i just had a quick question when you get the time. If an account has multiple edits that need to be reverted, each on different articles, should we be warning after each individual revert that we impose? Elvisisalive95 (talk) 00:05, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Elvisisalive95. In this situation one warning will suffice -Fastily 01:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
File talk:Fernando de Córdoba monument.png
I asked you to provide me the text from this lost talk page back in October. Unfortunately, I don't know what I did with it. Can you kindly post a new link to the text? Thanks, Srnec (talk) 06:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Srnec. Sure, -Fastily 07:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Could I get an undeletion request for page TaDarius Thomas (wrestler)
Could I get an undeletion request for page TaDarius Thomas (wrestler) Prionfox (talk) 16:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Prionfox. No, the page was deleted via deletion discussion, please direct your appeal to Misplaced Pages:Deletion review -Fastily 21:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
An invitation
You're invited to attend a meetup at the San Diego Central Library on Monday 26 February 2024. Hopefully see you there. RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 11:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Page review
Hi, I just created the Karachi Kickers article, and I see that the page has been previously deleted two times. First by @Materialscientist: in July 2013, indicating that the article was not notable, and the last time by you in December 2020. I have recreated it, since I think it can be a good addition in Wiki, as it is an important club in the history of a country where sadly football isnt very well covered. Can you please review it and let me know if there is anything I should change. Regards Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 13:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Re: image deletion discussion.
I don't think this image should have been deleted.
1) the assertion that it was a press agency image was false, the victim was a child not known before he died and the context and distribution of the image make it clear that it originated from his family, who it is perfectly permissible to use a minimal version of under the project's fair use rules. With cases like these it's often redistributed by agencies, who obviously do not own the copyright. It's also standard to have a picture of the murder victim on their article if one can be found that isn't a press agency image (which this isn't).
2) It's also particularly relevant to *this* article, as the victim's young age is what made it so notorious. Without a picture, the impact is lessened. I believe this should be undeleted, and per the advice on image undeletions I was told to ask you. I hope I've made my point well, have a good day. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:18, 22 February 2024 (UTC)