User talk:Mel Etitis: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 10:07, 10 April 2005 editとある白い猫 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,796 edits →Help?← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:19, 10 April 2005 edit undoとある白い猫 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,796 edits →Help?Next edit →
Line 131:		Line 131:
	A mediation is necesary to evade further conflict, the level of personal attacks I have to deal with is rather unreasonable. They think they are right, I am not sure what I think, I ask their proof regarding the matter. Apperantly I am supposed to accept the article as a solid fact to begin any discussion. The dispute in a nutshell is Goverment exterimination vs war casuality (Over simplified). --] ] 10:06, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)		A mediation is necesary to evade further conflict, the level of personal attacks I have to deal with is rather unreasonable. They think they are right, I am not sure what I think, I ask their proof regarding the matter. Apperantly I am supposed to accept the article as a solid fact to begin any discussion. The dispute in a nutshell is Goverment exterimination vs war casuality (Over simplified). --] ] 10:06, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

			Arbitration is necesary. The two users appeared in less than an hour of my post, all my edits are probably gone. Although arbitration started with personal attacks of fadix. Arbitration request is at a personal level, It is unnaceptable to call people names, like nazi or revisionist or declare them of a hidden agenda. I dont want user to die, I want him to be hurt so he stops. All I care is to be treated in a civilised manner. --] ] 10:19, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

	I thought I would bring this to your attention: FYI, I just reverted that specific edit by Coolcat. ] 09:53, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)		I thought I would bring this to your attention: FYI, I just reverted that specific edit by Coolcat. ] 09:53, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:19, 10 April 2005

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Deletion tools
Policy (log)
{{copyvio}}Copyvios (howto · log) {{subst:ffd}}Files (log) {{subst:rfd}}Redirects (howto · log) {{subst:mfd}}Miscellany (howto · log) {{delrev}}Deletion review
Articles (howto · log)
{{subst:relist}} · {{subst:prod\|why}} {{subst:afd}} · {{subst:prod blp}}
Templates (howto · log)
{{subst:tfd\|template}} {{subst:tfd2\|template\|why}} {{tfdnotice}}
Categories (howto · log)
{{subst:cfd}} · {{subst:cfdnotice}} {{subst:cfm}} · {{subst:cfm-speedy}} {{subst:cfr}} · {{subst:cfr-speedy}} {{cfl}}
Mergers
{{merge}} {{merge to}} · {{merge from}} {{merging}} · {{afd-mergeto}} {{afd-merge from}}
Page moves
{{subst:requested move\|Newname}}
Speedy
{{db-author}} · {{db-web}} {{db-nonsense}} · {{db-test}} {{db-nocontext}} · {{db-empty}} {{db-attack}} · {{db-catempty}} {{db-band}} · {{db-banned}} {{db-person}} · {{db-notenglish}} {{db-copyvio}} · {{db-repost}} {{db-vandalism}} · {{db-talk}} {{db-spam}} · {{db-nocontent}} {{db-copypaste}} · {{db-filecopyvio}} {{db-animal}} · {{db-multiple}} {{salt}} All speedy templates
Unfree files
{{subst:ffd}} {{subst:nsd}} · {{subst:nld}} {{subst:nrd}} · {{subst:rfu}} {{subst:orfud}} · {{subst:orfur}}
Transwiki (howto · log)
{{Copy to Wikibooks}} {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} {{Copy to Wikiquote}} {{Copy to Wikisource}} {{Copy to Wikiversity}} {{Copy to Wikivoyage}} All transwiki templates
v t e

Useful links

My archived talk pages

More to follow

Thanks for your comment - I hadn't realised the protocol!!! I have done it on other pages, but will cease forthwith Peter Shearan 13:02, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism and such

Is there a way to list only those edits of an IP that are not reverted already? I don't know if that possibility exists and I can't find it in the help. Shinobu 13:59, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I'm afraid that I don't know of any such technique — except to become an admin. One of the joys of sdminhood is the ability to 'rollback' an edit (a quick and easy form of reverting); the 'rollback' button appears next to edits that haven't yet been reverted. Sorry not to be able to help. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 15:35, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Well, I'll leave that job to the admins then. Except of course when some vandal has set his evil eyes on something in my watchlist ;-) Shinobu 15:56, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Oliver North

Just so you know, I've blocked the latest two sockpuppets: User:Kylewinters indefinitely for being a sockpuppet created to get round 3RR, and User:Sandleroneill for one week for creating Kylewinters, though if any more are created, the new one(s) will be blocked indefinitely too. That's 21 of them so far, I believe. He must have a high boredom threshold. Or is it a low one? SlimVirgin 19:52, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)

Traditions Magazine

I would think that the Cultural magazines category would be a closer fit than Paranormal magazines as most of the information contained within the magazine is relevant to specific cultures. There is a decent amount of paranormal information too, but more as it applies to cultures - both past and present. In truth, the best fit would be Anthropological magazines but there isn't a category for that and so Cultural magazines seemed better. I spent alot of time looking at similar pages and trying to find the best fit for the information based on other similar examples, even though there are admittedly few to choose from. Aislingbronach

Flattery

What a cheek. Indefinite block! Also, you might be interested in Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Simple view of ethics and morals. The title isn't lying. SlimVirgin 21:07, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)

Well, I've just issued my 50th final warning over on Talk:Oliver North. Paul Vogel is connected to Dnagit. I'm pretty sure they're not the same person, but they talk fairly regularly on some of Dnagit's discussion lists. I've noticed that the interest in cosmotheism, transhumanism etc seems to be seasonal, as though they're asleep in a pod most of the time but are brought to life by new moons or something. User:Willmcw was quite up on it at one point. He should be an admin by the way, if he isn't already, and I don't think he is. SlimVirgin 21:36, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)

FPI

your failure to be informed does not make me kooky

wingover

Thanks!

Thanks for that mail earlier. I'm glad you took the time to welcome me, and I'll do my best to help out Misplaced Pages where I can. Beanochris 22:13, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

(I hope this works)

Non-categorical non-Aristotlean integrity of Korean art forms.

Could you please read this article before you make a snap judgment on Korean art from your western perspective. Your logical razors are not sharpened to the eastern perspective.

While I can quote at great length enough aesthetic critics to make a 100 page book, suffice to say that the Korean aesthetic is different than western formulaic thinking. This is not a matter of neat categorical thinking as one would have in defining a law case, or the kind of exordia-narratio-divisio-confirmatio-confutatio arguments of Cicero where everything is in its place, and there is a place for everything implicitly.

We are not dealing with formal categories, Aristotlean or others, but a blending of art forms within each other: an integrated form that is part of the Korean philosophy of cultural integrity. This is part of the naturalness of Korean thinking, which does not force itself into categorical artifice. You are trying to make obviously Wordsworth rhyme like Pope. Reframe your perspective to a more natural romantic one than a classical absolutism which is instead found in Japanese works, not Korean. And if you must force some Greek method of thinking, cite Heraclitus.

Form is not necessary formal. And one cannot force Korean or asian art into western categorisation without severe error.

Please look at this briefly.

Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/Korean_art

thank you!

...for supporting my recent RFA as well. I've already enjoyed use of the Speedy Mop and Magic Bucket, as I see you have as well! Beautiful garden, by the way, and hello from another member of the over-40 club. Happy editing, Antandrus 03:50, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

"China"/"PRC" vs. "mainland China" for page titles

Following the long discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:Naming conventions (Chinese) regarding proper titling of Mainland China-related topics, polls for each single case has now been started here. Please come and join the discussion, and cast your vote. Thank you. — Insta ntnood 12:56, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)

"doctor"

Well merging them into one page seemed like a good idea until I saw Doctor (children's game) which contains too much information to merge without unbalancing the article. Also I believe that information is better kept separate, and it agrees with the research I did when I was thinking about writing it myself. If you really want these pages merged, I think you should include all the info from that page in the parent article. Kappa 20:12, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

It looks to me like whoever made that page found pretty much the same google results I did, and recycled them pretty much the way I would have done (except I would have given references). Kappa 20:42, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The Hoobs

Just wondering, why did you remove my bias template from The Hoobs? The article is clearly not neutral, and should be re-written or re-worded to conform with Misplaced Pages's policy on a neutral point of view. -- Daniel Lawrence 21:58, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Seems like you and DDerby have already made it a presentable stub. All this for a kids programme, eh. -- Daniel Lawrence 22:12, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Paul Vunak

Yep, it's insane how many stubs are made in an hour --DDerby 22:09, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Note anything below this is not me...--DDerby 22:15, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Why did you revert the Neo-Fascism page without discussing it?

Thanks

Hi Mel,

thaks for welcoming me! I'd just like to tell you that I like contributing pieces of knowledge for the sake of improving Misplaced Pages. I'm mainly around the German Misplaced Pages (I'm a native of Munich, Gemany). I have been learning English for thirty years now and therefore I think my English is appropriate to make small contributions to the Englisch Misplaced Pages. Thanks again for your warm welcome here!

Max

Category Definitions?

You said that the Cultural magazines category was for art related websites, specificly quoted as "artsy fartsy," and not as a reference to cultural in the anthropolgical sense. As such, Bukhara magazine would be cultural in the sense of the Persian culture and not in an art sense. Bukhara magazine covers Iranian and Persian philosophy, history, culture, literature, language, history, and civilization.

Help?

What do you think of Stereotek and Davenbelle's edits? They conflict with everything I do, They interfere with every article I get involved. I have been stuck with same articles over a month. Their actions are childish and frankly stupid. --Cool Cat 03:50, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Well they claim they are protecting wikipedia from me in expense of me. I do not like it. If they discuss I can work with it. If they just revert edits and vanish, frankly that can be called a number of things. Vandalism is definately one of them, although farfetched. I was not prepared to deal with this, still am not. Check their contribs too... --Cool Cat 09:17, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Can you find me a mediator to deal with Armenian Genocide, conversation just cooled so perfect time for positive action. --Cool Cat 09:19, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Well, I want a productive experience, as you can clearly see, they are my shadow. --Cool Cat 09:56, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

A mediation is necesary to evade further conflict, the level of personal attacks I have to deal with is rather unreasonable. They think they are right, I am not sure what I think, I ask their proof regarding the matter. Apperantly I am supposed to accept the article as a solid fact to begin any discussion. The dispute in a nutshell is Goverment exterimination vs war casuality (Over simplified). --Cool Cat 10:06, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Arbitration is necesary. The two users appeared in less than an hour of my post, all my edits are probably gone. Although arbitration started with personal attacks of fadix. Arbitration request is at a personal level, It is unnaceptable to call people names, like nazi or revisionist or declare them of a hidden agenda. I dont want user to die, I want him to be hurt so he stops. All I care is to be treated in a civilised manner. --Cool Cat 10:19, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I thought I would bring this to your attention: FYI, I just reverted that specific edit by Coolcat. Stereotek 09:53, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

User:Coolcat

Hi, please see my posts at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration#Statement by party 4, Davenbelle re User:Coolcat — Davenbelle 09:34, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)