Revision as of 18:09, 21 March 2024 editR Prazeres (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users30,781 edits Warning about edit-warring: stop immediately or you will likely be blockedā Previous edit | Revision as of 19:28, 24 March 2024 edit undoāµāµāµā“½āµāµāµā“½ā“°ā“±āµ¢āµ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,994 edits āMarch 2024: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Disambiguation links added New topicNext edit ā | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | ||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 18:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC) | If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 18:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
== March 2024 == | |||
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about ]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's workāwhether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each timeācounts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->] (]) 19:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:28, 24 March 2024
March 2024
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Dhurma Massacre (1818). Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Unknown-Treeš²? (talk) 03:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Unknown-Treeš²? (talk) 04:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- How am I not being neutral? I have added some important details which have not been mentioned and altered incorrect details. And I am a Saudi, so who are you to tell me my own history? Araboud (talk) 12:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- For example, you called the people of Dhurma "brave", which is a violation of the neutral point of viewāsuch claims must be attributed per WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV. In some of your edit summaries, you claim you are a historian and have "asked citizens of Dhurma"; however original research is not allowed on Misplaced Pages, and neither are primary sourcesāespecially citizens of a town some 200 years after the event.
- I am not trying to "tell you your own history", but instead I am following the guidelines that statements in Misplaced Pages articles should be based on reliable, secondary sources. Unknown-Treeš²? (talk) 15:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dhurma Massacre (1818). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 18:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
Your recent editing history at Article shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editingāespecially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's workāwhether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each timeācounts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warringāeven if you do not violate the three-revert ruleāshould your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.āµāµāµā“½āµāµāµā“½ā“°ā“±āµ¢āµ (talk) 19:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)