Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:24, 12 April 2007

• ]

WP:RFC/U redirects here. You may be looking for Misplaced Pages:Request for checkuser (WP:RFCU).

This process is for discussing specific users who have violated Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. In order to request comments on a user's actions, follow the instructions to create a subpage in the section below. Disputes over the writing of articles, including disputes over how best to follow the NPOV policy, belong in Article content disputes.

Uncertified user RfCs

Requests for comment which do not meet the minimum requirements 48 hours after creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment#Request comment on users for the minimum requirements. The subject RFC page will also be deleted, unless the subject has explicitly requested it to be retained.

Closing and archiving

Disputes may be removed from this page and archived under any of the following circumstances:

1. If no additional complaints are registered for an extended period of time, and the dispute appears to have stopped.
2. The parties to the dispute agree.
3. The dispute proceeds to another method of dispute resolution, such as mediation or arbitration.

Remove the link from the list here and add it to the archives at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive. If the dispute is handled in mediation or arbitration, please make a note of where the dispute resolution process continued.

General user conduct

Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges or the choice of username. To list a user conduct dispute, please create a subpage using Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Example user as a template, and then list it as follows:

Example user

{one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~ (note: that is five tildes, not four, RFCs are signed with the date only, not your username)

Candidate pages

These RfCs still need to meet the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.

DPeterson

WP:CIVIL harrassing everyone who disagrees with him. 18:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Approved pages

These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.

QuackGuru

Disruptive editing and POV pushing on Misplaced Pages-related articles. 09:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

BassxForte

WP:3RR,WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, WP:NOT#OR, WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE, WP:CON, WP:ATT (WP:OR, WP:VERIFY, WP:RS), WP:NPA, WP:EW 02:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Desiphral

Ignoring consensus, repeated insertion of Original Research, and refusal to provide reliable published sources. WP:NOR, WP:CON, WP:ATT, WP:NPOV (especially WP:UNDUE). 22:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Martinphi

WP:DE, WP:NPOV, WP:3RR, WP:SOCK, WP:SPAM, WP:FRINGE, WP:POVFORK 22:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Mbhiii

WP:AGF WP:CIVIL WP:NPA WP:OWN 17:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/CineWorld

WP:BLP, WP:BIO, WP:CIVIL, WP:3RR, WP:NPA, WP:POINT, WP:USER. 07:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Certified.Gangsta

Misplaced Pages:Consensus, Misplaced Pages:Edit war. 01:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

DorisH

WP:CIVIL, WP:VAND; Acting in an uncivil, disruptive manner by blanking large section of article and making personal attacks. 13:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Emir Arven

WP:CIVIL, WP:NPOV, WP:OWN, WP:AGF, WP:RS, WP:NOR, WP:3RR, WP:VAND, WP:NOT, WP:BITE, WP:NPA, WP:CANVAS, WP:POINT, WP:ATT, WP:BLP, WP:CON. WP:DR, WP:DE; long history of incivility, disruption, extreme ethnic stereotype & prejudice canvasing 15:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Use of administrator privileges

This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by Misplaced Pages:Administrators. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, and blocking or unblocking users. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the General user conduct section above. To list a dispute, create a subpage using the following sample as a template:

Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Example admin

Allegations: {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~

As with disputes over general user conduct, at least two people must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted.

Candidate pages

These RfCs still need to meet the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.

none currently listed

Approved pages

These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.

Darwinek

Allegations: Misuse of blocking in content disputes 15:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)