| Revision as of 04:19, 13 April 2007 editGarrieIrons (talk | contribs)6,068 edits Referencing← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:30, 15 November 2007 edit undoAdimovk5 (talk | contribs)2,840 edits →ReferencingNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| It would help greatly if, before the article grows bigger, it changed to using <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> markup for all references. | It would help greatly if, before the article grows bigger, it changed to using <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> markup for all references. | ||
| ]]] 04:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | ]]] 04:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Cleaned up most of the references. Some are broken and some dead. Also the article relies heavily on the AEI and NGOWatch websites which are biased sources.-----] 03:30, 15 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:30, 15 November 2007
NPOV and other problems?
Dear Spartaz, could you explain what exactly is POV and "wrong tone" in this article? You are also very welcome to improve the article yourself. I will try to improve the article as time allows. Biophys 21:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- O'K, I have made a few changes. More should be done.Biophys 21:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Referencing
This article has a confusingly long list of references mixed with in-line URL links. But it does not have inline citation which would help the reader identify which items have been sourced from independent publications, and which items are "as stated by NGOWatch". It would help greatly if, before the article grows bigger, it changed to using <ref></ref> markup for all references. Garrie 04:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Cleaned up most of the references. Some are broken and some dead. Also the article relies heavily on the AEI and NGOWatch websites which are biased sources.-----Adimovk5 03:30, 15 November 2007 (UTC)