| Revision as of 10:22, 22 May 2024 edit181.77.39.45 (talk) →= acesso bloqueado com sucesso SucessoTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:22, 22 May 2024 edit undo181.77.39.45 (talk) →Template:Acesso bloqueado com sucesso SucessoTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| :Agreed. Done. ] (]) 19:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC) | :Agreed. Done. ] (]) 19:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
| =={{ acesso bloqueado com sucesso Sucesso}}== | |||
| == Vandalism? Promotion? == | |||
| IP-addresses including | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| *likely many more in the same range | |||
| posted in late February many television series releases (like ) on pages like ] like they are notable events. It don’t seems notable?. But is it also vandalism or promotion? Or should it all be moved to pages like ] ] (]) 13:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == acesso bloqueado com sucesso Sucesso = | == acesso bloqueado com sucesso Sucesso = | ||
Revision as of 10:22, 22 May 2024
{{ acesso bloqueado com sucesso Sucesso}{=
Semantics: Vandalism vs Harrassment distinction
Hi, why exactly does Misplaced Pages draw a line between vandalism and user harassment, considering both offences are treated the same (as far as I know)? Simple record-keeping? I‘m not an experienced user (as apparent by the IP address), but I‘m still curious. - Epsilon 2A09:80C0:192:0:7841:1E51:2CF6:E039 (talk) 11:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
description of image vandalism
Should Misplaced Pages:Vandalism#Image_vandalism perhaps be reworded so that it cannot be interpreted as claiming that it is okay to upload explicit images of minors? I can't imagine anyone would seriously read it that way, but I can't be the only one to have done a double-take when reading the description.
Cheers, Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 19:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. Done. Dan Bloch (talk) 19:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)