| Revision as of 18:51, 13 April 2007 editHalibutt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,067 edits →Sources← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:57, 13 April 2007 edit undoIrpen (talk | contribs)32,604 edits →SourcesNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :You've provided no justification for your claims of OR. I'm changing the tag to "unreferenced". ] (]) 15:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | :You've provided no justification for your claims of OR. I'm changing the tag to "unreferenced". ] (]) 15:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::Sources provided. ''<font color="#901">//</font>'']] 18:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | ::Sources provided. ''<font color="#901">//</font>'']] 18:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| The article is mostly referenced to some web-site as well as articles in the non-scholarly papers. I would like to see it either resourced to the scholarly sources or the scholarly credentials of the authors of whatever the current sources are to be confirmed. | |||
| Scholarly sources includes peer-reviewed journals, books published by academic publishers or by the unversity presses. If, however, the author who is otherwise established in academia publishes the article in a normally non-academic source (web-site or politica tygodnyk), this would also be acceptable. What is non-acceptable is non-academic publications authored by people with no confirmed credentials. Thank you. --] 21:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:57, 13 April 2007
Sources
Respectfully, I couldn't see any sources in support of such blatant original research.Vlad fedorov 08:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- You've provided no justification for your claims of OR. I'm changing the tag to "unreferenced". Appleseed (Talk) 15:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sources provided. //Halibutt 18:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
The article is mostly referenced to some web-site as well as articles in the non-scholarly papers. I would like to see it either resourced to the scholarly sources or the scholarly credentials of the authors of whatever the current sources are to be confirmed.
Scholarly sources includes peer-reviewed journals, books published by academic publishers or by the unversity presses. If, however, the author who is otherwise established in academia publishes the article in a normally non-academic source (web-site or politica tygodnyk), this would also be acceptable. What is non-acceptable is non-academic publications authored by people with no confirmed credentials. Thank you. --Irpen 21:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)