| Revision as of 20:04, 13 April 2007 editJustanother (talk | contribs)9,266 edits Hardly think this qualifies for Speedy as the Delete votes in the previous AfDs outnumbered the Keep votes.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:15, 13 April 2007 edit undoJustanother (talk | contribs)9,266 edits →[]: easier links to previous AfDsNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} | {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} | ||
| Delete as non-notable attorney. Two previous AfDs ended in "no consensus" with the majority of the "Keep" votes being placed by previously involved Scientology critics and the majority of the "Delete" votes by neutral editors. An admin, ], placed the ] and questioned the "No consensus" close of the first.<blockquote>''"] was closed as a "no consensus" in a self-contradictory closure despite a 5/2 count for deletion and no sourced claim that the subject – a lawyer for Scientology – is notable. . ."''</blockquote>--] 19:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | Delete as non-notable attorney. Two previous AfDs (] and ]) ended in "no consensus" with the majority of the "Keep" votes being placed by previously involved Scientology critics and the majority of the "Delete" votes by neutral editors. An admin, ], placed the ] and questioned the "No consensus" close of the first.<blockquote>''"] was closed as a "no consensus" in a self-contradictory closure despite a 5/2 count for deletion and no sourced claim that the subject – a lawyer for Scientology – is notable. . ."''</blockquote>--] 19:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy Keep''' - no new argument. Bowles was Moxon's partner . The two separated in the 90ies. Notable enough as a Moxon name partner, and who's still lawyer for scientology causes. --] 19:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | *'''Speedy Keep''' - no new argument. Bowles was Moxon's partner . The two separated in the 90ies. Notable enough as a Moxon name partner, and who's still lawyer for scientology causes. --] 19:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| **Hardly think this qualifies for Speedy as the Delete votes in the previous AfDs outnumbered the Keep votes, especially if you count unique voters as the Keep votes were basically the same crew while the Delete voters were different in each case. I will notify all previous voters as time permits. --] 20:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | **Hardly think this qualifies for Speedy as the Delete votes in the previous AfDs outnumbered the Keep votes, especially if you count unique voters as the Keep votes were basically the same crew while the Delete voters were different in each case. I will notify all previous voters as time permits. --] 20:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:15, 13 April 2007
Tim Bowles
Delete as non-notable attorney. Two previous AfDs (1st AfD and 2nd AfD) ended in "no consensus" with the majority of the "Keep" votes being placed by previously involved Scientology critics and the majority of the "Delete" votes by neutral editors. An admin, trialsanderrors, placed the 2nd AfD and questioned the "No consensus" close of the first.
"First AfD was closed as a "no consensus" in a self-contradictory closure despite a 5/2 count for deletion and no sourced claim that the subject – a lawyer for Scientology – is notable. . ."
--Justanother 19:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep - no new argument. Bowles was Moxon's partner . The two separated in the 90ies. Notable enough as a Moxon name partner, and who's still lawyer for scientology causes. --Tilman 19:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Hardly think this qualifies for Speedy as the Delete votes in the previous AfDs outnumbered the Keep votes, especially if you count unique voters as the Keep votes were basically the same crew while the Delete voters were different in each case. I will notify all previous voters as time permits. --Justanother 20:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)