| Revision as of 07:35, 10 June 2024 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,380,722 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Nordic Resistance Movement/Archives/2024 1. (BOT)← Previous edit |
Revision as of 11:28, 28 September 2024 edit undo2a00:23c6:d603:8001:a0:e6e4:fe98:d178 (talk) →membership?: new sectionTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topicNext edit → |
| Line 27: |
Line 27: |
|
| User1 = WikiHeathen | U1-EH = yes | U1-declared = yes |U1-otherlinks = |U1-banned = |
|
| User1 = WikiHeathen | U1-EH = yes | U1-declared = yes |U1-otherlinks = |U1-banned = |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== membership? == |
|
|
|
|
|
it would be good to have at least some gauges of size in the box at the top of the article, even if vague and/or outdated as is the case with the AWD article. Without a measure of size the NRM could either be an almost non-existent, irrelevant phantom “network” of people that claim its name, like Niners (the Order of Nine Angles), or a more relevant/fanatic/monolithic National Socialist political presence such as Rusich group. |
|
|
A claimed consensus figure could be good, though of course Misplaced Pages standards would mean making it clear that it’s (claimed) membership. |
|
|
I don’t see a reason why NRM would lie about it’s proliferation as the dichotomy is as a Radical “Extremist” movement: |
|
|
• highballing your membership makes it out like you have a bunch of lackey members and just sit inactive all day like Sonnenkreig (if SKD even exists beyond a few 2018 Discord teenagers) |
|
|
• lowballing your membership makes it out like you’re close-knit, which isn’t a good look for a variety of reasons. |
|
|
NRM does seem quite divided in ideology but it’s obviously National Socialist. Its members sipped and are sipping the waffen (and more obscurely, Niner?) ice tea but it seems more like 00s vanguard just-wait-for-the-system-to-collapse-itself National Socialism than Orthodox waffen accelerationist. At least the majority of its members. ] (]) 11:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC) |
it would be good to have at least some gauges of size in the box at the top of the article, even if vague and/or outdated as is the case with the AWD article. Without a measure of size the NRM could either be an almost non-existent, irrelevant phantom “network” of people that claim its name, like Niners (the Order of Nine Angles), or a more relevant/fanatic/monolithic National Socialist political presence such as Rusich group.
A claimed consensus figure could be good, though of course Misplaced Pages standards would mean making it clear that it’s (claimed) membership.
I don’t see a reason why NRM would lie about it’s proliferation as the dichotomy is as a Radical “Extremist” movement:
• highballing your membership makes it out like you have a bunch of lackey members and just sit inactive all day like Sonnenkreig (if SKD even exists beyond a few 2018 Discord teenagers)
• lowballing your membership makes it out like you’re close-knit, which isn’t a good look for a variety of reasons.
NRM does seem quite divided in ideology but it’s obviously National Socialist. Its members sipped and are sipping the waffen (and more obscurely, Niner?) ice tea but it seems more like 00s vanguard just-wait-for-the-system-to-collapse-itself National Socialism than Orthodox waffen accelerationist. At least the majority of its members. 2A00:23C6:D603:8001:A0:E6E4:FE98:D178 (talk) 11:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
