Revision as of 14:16, 12 June 2024 editBneu2013 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users23,189 edits →Failed GA: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:22, 13 June 2024 edit undoChipmunkdavis (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers66,424 edits →Failed GA: GA viewTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
I recently quickfailed the GA nomination of ] because of several outstanding issues that I think need to be dealt with before the article is in a state where it is close to meeting the GA criteria. I provided extensive comments on ], but I think in particular it fails 1, 2a, and (partially) 3. However, the nominator has challenged my action, and I'd appreciate if other road editors could provide feedback and let me know if they think I made the right decision or not. In addition, I think the ] of ] was done in haste, and may have some of the same issues as this article. I'd actually raised these issues before the review. ] (]) 14:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC) | I recently quickfailed the GA nomination of ] because of several outstanding issues that I think need to be dealt with before the article is in a state where it is close to meeting the GA criteria. I provided extensive comments on ], but I think in particular it fails 1, 2a, and (partially) 3. However, the nominator has challenged my action, and I'd appreciate if other road editors could provide feedback and let me know if they think I made the right decision or not. In addition, I think the ] of ] was done in haste, and may have some of the same issues as this article. I'd actually raised these issues before the review. ] (]) 14:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
:Just from the GA side as input was requested at WT:GAN, while it would have been good for ] to more explicitly cite the GA criteria, I do not believe this is technically a quickfail as it did receive extensive comments. I would categorise it as a normal fail. ] (]) 01:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:22, 13 June 2024
U.S. Roads Project‑class | ||||||||||
|
Centralized discussion for the U.S. Roads WikiProject
Shortcut
Archives: Index, 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
WikiProject U.S. Roads was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on May 3, 2010. |
AARoads Wiki
Please join us over at the AARoads Wiki. We look forward to seeing you soon! Imzadi 1979 → 20:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- I sure hope that this project isn't shutting down. It would be unfortunate for us to cave to the opinions of non-content contributors at an RfC who probably don't even know how to read a map. Bneu2013 (talk) 02:16, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- I've marked the page as per this. 20:59, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- I just want to state for the record that I intend to continue maintenance of Washington articles as well as those I brought up to GA status in other states. I'm going to be contributing to both projects, albeit with less detail for roads articles on here. SounderBruce 04:27, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- In reality there are two more alternative sites we can choose from - Justapedia and Encycla. The former is a Misplaced Pages-like site that forked all contents from here last year and has lenient notability requirements. 5.181.21.208 (talk) 13:30, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
67.243.41.15 edits
Could someone take a look at the edits 67.243.41.15 is making. All ok? Thanks in advance, -- Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 02:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Failed GA
I recently quickfailed the GA nomination of Interstate 485 because of several outstanding issues that I think need to be dealt with before the article is in a state where it is close to meeting the GA criteria. I provided extensive comments on the review page, but I think in particular it fails 1, 2a, and (partially) 3. However, the nominator has challenged my action, and I'd appreciate if other road editors could provide feedback and let me know if they think I made the right decision or not. In addition, I think the GA review of Interstate 85 in North Carolina was done in haste, and may have some of the same issues as this article. I'd actually raised these issues before the review. Bneu2013 (talk) 14:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Just from the GA side as input was requested at WT:GAN, while it would have been good for Talk:Interstate 485/GA1 to more explicitly cite the GA criteria, I do not believe this is technically a quickfail as it did receive extensive comments. I would categorise it as a normal fail. CMD (talk) 01:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)