Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 07:15, 17 June 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Superpower article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 30 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Power in international relations (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Power in international relations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Power in international relationsWikipedia:WikiProject Power in international relationsTemplate:WikiProject Power in international relationsPower in international relations International relations High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics: American Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

The contents of the Superpower collapse page were merged into Superpower on 15 March 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

The contents of the Superpower disengagement page were merged into Superpower on 11 May 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. ] Anchor Satellite state#Soviet Union links to a specific web page: Soviet Union. ] The anchor (#Dictatorship of the bourgeoisie) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

On 7 June 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Superpower (politics). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

American overseas military map graphic - Should be altered?

The graphic overstates the extend of American military hegemony. For instance, Brazil is colored - but there are only 27 military personnel stationed there, which is more of a diplomatic or training mission than a superpower projection.

I think the map should only highlight countries with at least 100, or 500, or 1000 stationed personnel.

I'm getting the numbers from this German media report which details personnel numbers across the world: https://kritisches-netzwerk.de/sites/default/files/us_department_of_defense_-_base_structure_report_fiscal_year_2015_baseline_-_as_of_30_sept_2014_-_a_summary_of_the_real_property_inventory_-_206_pages.pdf

I propose that Honduras, Brazil, Greenland, Iceland, Norway, Bulgaria, Greece, Philippines, and Australia should not be colored on the map due to low personnel sizes based on the figures in the aforementioned report.

Unilateral edition

Someone edited the part about emerging superpowers and decided to delete informations about Brazil and the image showing potential superpowers was substituted without any discussion about it. Personal feelings are not determinants in Misplaced Pages, at least it shouldn’t be.

Merge proposal: Superpower Disengagement

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was merge based on previous discussion and silent concensus.GeogSage 17:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Following up on the merge of Superpower Collapse into Superpower, the topic of merging Superpower Disengagement into Superpower had support. This is a formal proposal of that. I believe some content from this page can be merged into the sections of superpower, and then a redirect created. Pinging @Gluonz and Thenightaway: GeogSage 19:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Merge proposal: Potential superpower

Following the merge of superpower collapse and superpower disengagement, I believe the page Potential superpower could be merged into superpower. I don't believe there is enough difference to justify the two distinct pages. Merging them would improve the main superpower page significantly. The content can be put into the existing section of the same name. GeogSage 22:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Support. There's no reason to have two separate articles on basically the same subject. It dilutes editor efforts and results in lower quality articles. Thenightaway (talk) 23:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Oppose - Unless you're also suggesting large-scales reductions in detail the merged article is likely to be too long to be easily navigable. Rambling Rambler (talk) 13:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Comment- If the merge is accepted, I would encourage any editor to help boil down the merged section to remove redundant information and keep the page navigable. GeogSage 02:20, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose Vastly different topics. REDISCOVERBHARAT (talk) 07:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 7 June 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 20:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Superpower → Superpower (politics) – Both the political term and the popular culture term have wide usage, so this page should be moved to specify politics, and the disambiguation page should be moved to just "Superpower" Blubabluba9990 (talk) (contribs) 22:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari Scribe 20:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

1. Support I was initially leaning oppose, but read through the Misplaced Pages: Disambiguation guidelines and agree this makes sense. Just to point out, there is also a page Superpower (horse), and Superpower (song). Looking at views for all of them, and it looks like while Superpower (politics) is the most widely viewed, the others do have fairly wide usage. Several pages link to Superpower right now, so those all would need to be fixed.

GeogSage 02:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Given that all of the television show season pages were moved by a bot after that proposal, there is likely a bot that can fix all of those links. Blubabluba9990 (talk) (contribs) 01:52, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose the ability article is still basically a dicdef and example farm, while the others besides that fail to demonstrate being anything close to primary. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
• oppose per ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ Arnoutf (talk) 17:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Power in international relations, WikiProject Politics/American politics, INACTIVEWP, WikiProject International relations, and WikiProject Politics have been notified of this discussion. Safari Scribe 20:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages controversial topics
• B-Class International relations articles
• High-importance International relations articles
• WikiProject International relations articles
• B-Class politics articles
• Mid-importance politics articles
• B-Class American politics articles
• Mid-importance American politics articles
• American politics task force articles
• WikiProject Politics articles