Misplaced Pages

Talk:2006 Slovak–Hungarian diplomatic affairs: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:12, 15 April 2007 edit195.56.224.237 (talk) rvv← Previous edit Revision as of 18:13, 15 April 2007 edit undoTankred (talk | contribs)7,836 editsm banned users are not allow editing Misplaced Pages!Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
==Tag== ==Tag==
The text of this article is not very well balanced and it is based to great degree on the information provided by HHRF, which is a Hungarian foundation protecting interests of the Hungarian minorities living abroad. They are far from being independent. Moreover, they are not supported by any major nongovernmental organization from outside Hungary, which is quite strange. I do not consider their website a credible and authoritative source and I tagged this article as non-compliant with the standards of Misplaced Pages until it cites only major credible sources that do not push a particular POV. ] 03:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC) The text of this article is not very well balanced and it is based to great degree on the information provided by HHRF, which is a Hungarian foundation protecting interests of the Hungarian minorities living abroad. They are far from being independent. Moreover, they are not supported by any major nongovernmental organization from outside Hungary, which is quite strange. I do not consider their website a credible and authoritative source and I tagged this article as non-compliant with the standards of Misplaced Pages until it cites only major credible sources that do not push a particular POV. ] 03:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

What if you would not call any source a POV, wich is not in Serbian or Slovak or not reflects your POV. You're maintaining a perfect ].

==Tankred's lie #21030424000===
This is it: ''""''

The incriminated section:

''"], the vice-president of the Smer party, has called for the banning of singing the Hungarian national anthem in Catholic Churches, claiming that this is disloyal to Slovakia.<ref> http://www.hhrf.org/monitor/206slo.htm</ref> Even ], current prime minister and leader of the Smer party, has made controversial statements in this regard as well.<ref>http://index.hu/politika/kulfold/nyitra5601/ </ref>"''
''<references />''

The section was moved from ] here, by infed banned ]. Into that article, indef banned (for two month - LOL) ] moved from ] article. Into that article, the refences were added by ] , so as the whole section.
So:
*It was added by another user, ] , not a banned one.
*Not only references but the whole "section", if two lines can be called a section.
*The section does not claim that Caplovic was prime minister (or any similar). Nor mentioning 2002 or any date, and nor in that kind of a context.
*Tankred claimed many times before, that he's not speaking Hungarian, but here, claimes the sources are inaccurate. Well, they're not. http://www.stars21.com/ - a good page or text translator. for en-hu-en.

This is the problem, not User:VinceB (me). Speak nice, or die. --] 17:38, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:13, 15 April 2007

Tag

The text of this article is not very well balanced and it is based to great degree on the information provided by HHRF, which is a Hungarian foundation protecting interests of the Hungarian minorities living abroad. They are far from being independent. Moreover, they are not supported by any major nongovernmental organization from outside Hungary, which is quite strange. I do not consider their website a credible and authoritative source and I tagged this article as non-compliant with the standards of Misplaced Pages until it cites only major credible sources that do not push a particular POV. Tankred 03:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)