Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User names: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 09:51, 16 April 2007 editNikoSilver (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users13,519 edits →Spammyou: there← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:56, 16 April 2007 edit undoDismas (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers79,891 editsm + userNext edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*'''Disallow'''. Usernames should not promote illegal or otherwise harmful activities. Since this user hasn't done any actual spamming, asking them to change it instead of outright blocking is probably a good idea. - ]\|] 08:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)		*'''Disallow'''. Usernames should not promote illegal or otherwise harmful activities. Since this user hasn't done any actual spamming, asking them to change it instead of outright blocking is probably a good idea. - ]\|] 08:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
	*In light of the new tendency to discuss the opinion rather than simply expressing and then discussing it, I tend to recognize that this is one of the apparently not-so-rare borderline cases where there is a conflict of policies that needs input by multiple users. ], explicitly prohibits the use of the apparent first component of the username ("spam"). On the other hand, ] suggests that since the user has some constructive contributions, we shouldn't ] them. Nevertheless, the user is encouraged to change their name, and if they don't then that would create an awkward precedent, so I am compelled to express my concern. The user should take this as a positive suggestion that will help them interact in the future with other users in Misplaced Pages, without the negative connotations of the name they have picked. I sincerely hope that the closing admin will manage to understand what on earth I'm talking about, and classify my comment in the intended side of this discussion (which is not a vote). I'll be happy to summarize the above in 3 words if requested, but that would be in violation of the interpretation of the spirit of the MfD that this page recently went through (which was not a vote either). I also hope that the users commenting below will manage to neither refer to my comment ("per NikoSilver"), nor repeat the rationale of my comment with different wording (flooding), nor fall in the trap of interpreting my comment with the 3 words that could summarize it. ]] 09:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)		*In light of the new tendency to discuss the opinion rather than simply expressing and then discussing it, I tend to recognize that this is one of the apparently not-so-rare borderline cases where there is a conflict of policies that needs input by multiple users. ], explicitly prohibits the use of the apparent first component of the username ("spam"). On the other hand, ] suggests that since the user has some constructive contributions, we shouldn't ] them. Nevertheless, the user is encouraged to change their name, and if they don't then that would create an awkward precedent, so I am compelled to express my concern. The user should take this as a positive suggestion that will help them interact in the future with other users in Misplaced Pages, without the negative connotations of the name they have picked. I sincerely hope that the closing admin will manage to understand what on earth I'm talking about, and classify my comment in the intended side of this discussion (which is not a vote). I'll be happy to summarize the above in 3 words if requested, but that would be in violation of the interpretation of the spirit of the MfD that this page recently went through (which was not a vote either). I also hope that the users commenting below will manage to neither refer to my comment ("per NikoSilver"), nor repeat the rationale of my comment with different wording (flooding), nor fall in the trap of interpreting my comment with the 3 words that could summarize it. ]] 09:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
			{{#if:{{{nosubst\|}}}\|<div style="display:none;">}} {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}\|Misplaced Pages\| \|{{error:not substituted\|Rfcn1}}<div style="display:none;">}}
			==Dismas is gay==
			{{user\|Dismas is gay}}
			:Account is a clear attack on me due to my edits of the article for ]. The same person has been creating new accounts every couple days in order to add the same copyrighted image back into the article. You'll see that the user has also made edits to ]. <span style="font-family:monospace;">]</span>\|] 09:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
			{{#if:{{{nosubst\|}}}\|</div></div>}}

Revision as of 09:56, 16 April 2007

Shortcuts

Navigation: Archives • Instructions for closing administrators • Purge page cache

This page is for bringing attention to usernames which may be in violation of Misplaced Pages's username policy. Before listing a username here, consider if it should be more appropriately reported elsewhere, or if it needs to be reported at all:

Report blatantly inappropriate usernames, such as usernames that are obscene or inflammatory, to Misplaced Pages:Usernames for administrator attention.
For other cases involving vandalism, personal attacks or other urgent issues, try Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents; blatant vandalism can also be reported at Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism, which is sometimes a better option.

Do NOT post here if:

the user in question has made no recent edits.
you wish to have the block of a user reviewed. Instead, discuss the block with the blocking administrator (see also Misplaced Pages:Blocking policy § Unblocking).

Before adding a name here you MUST ensure that the user in question:

has been warned about their username (with e.g. {{subst:uw-username}}) and has been allowed time to address the concern on their user talk page.
has disagreed with the concern, refused to change their username and/or continued to edit without replying to the warning.
is not already blocked.

If, after having followed all the steps above, you still believe the username violates Misplaced Pages's username policy, you may list it here with an explanation of which part of the username policy you think has been violated. After posting, please alert the user of the discussion (with e.g. {{subst:UsernameDiscussion}}). You may also invite others who have expressed concern about the username to comment on the discussion by use of this template.

Add new requests below, using the syntax {{subst:rfcn1|username|2=reason ~~~~}}.

Tools: Special:ListUsers, Special:BlockList

Spammyou

Spammyou (talk · contribs)

The username policy does not allow names that seem to threaten unpleasant activities such as spam. "Spammyou" has no other meaning; I checked Google. YechielMan 07:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

I'd say this is not blockable but a change should be encouraged, since this user has ade some useful contributions, again giving the a chance to explain would be good. I see no actual spamming. GDonato (talk) 08:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Disallow. Usernames should not promote illegal or otherwise harmful activities. Since this user hasn't done any actual spamming, asking them to change it instead of outright blocking is probably a good idea. - Mgm| 08:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
In light of the new tendency to discuss the opinion rather than simply expressing and then discussing it, I tend to recognize that this is one of the apparently not-so-rare borderline cases where there is a conflict of policies that needs input by multiple users. WP:U#Trouble, explicitly prohibits the use of the apparent first component of the username ("spam"). On the other hand, WP:AGF suggests that since the user has some constructive contributions, we shouldn't WP:BITE them. Nevertheless, the user is encouraged to change their name, and if they don't then that would create an awkward precedent, so I am compelled to express my concern. The user should take this as a positive suggestion that will help them interact in the future with other users in Misplaced Pages, without the negative connotations of the name they have picked. I sincerely hope that the closing admin will manage to understand what on earth I'm talking about, and classify my comment in the intended side of this discussion (which is not a vote). I'll be happy to summarize the above in 3 words if requested, but that would be in violation of the interpretation of the spirit of the MfD that this page recently went through (which was not a vote either). I also hope that the users commenting below will manage to neither refer to my comment ("per NikoSilver"), nor repeat the rationale of my comment with different wording (flooding), nor fall in the trap of interpreting my comment with the 3 words that could summarize it. Niko Silver 09:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Dismas is gay

Dismas is gay (talk · contribs)

Account is a clear attack on me due to my edits of the article for Vikki Blows. The same person has been creating new accounts every couple days in order to add the same copyrighted image back into the article. You'll see that the user has also made edits to Image:Vikki blows6.jpg. Dismas| 09:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:51, 16 April 2007 editNikoSilver (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users13,519 edits →Spammyou: there← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:56, 16 April 2007 edit undoDismas (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers79,891 editsm + userNext edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*'''Disallow'''. Usernames should not promote illegal or otherwise harmful activities. Since this user hasn't done any actual spamming, asking them to change it instead of outright blocking is probably a good idea. - ]\|] 08:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)		*'''Disallow'''. Usernames should not promote illegal or otherwise harmful activities. Since this user hasn't done any actual spamming, asking them to change it instead of outright blocking is probably a good idea. - ]\|] 08:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
	*In light of the new tendency to discuss the opinion rather than simply expressing and then discussing it, I tend to recognize that this is one of the apparently not-so-rare borderline cases where there is a conflict of policies that needs input by multiple users. ], explicitly prohibits the use of the apparent first component of the username ("spam"). On the other hand, ] suggests that since the user has some constructive contributions, we shouldn't ] them. Nevertheless, the user is encouraged to change their name, and if they don't then that would create an awkward precedent, so I am compelled to express my concern. The user should take this as a positive suggestion that will help them interact in the future with other users in Misplaced Pages, without the negative connotations of the name they have picked. I sincerely hope that the closing admin will manage to understand what on earth I'm talking about, and classify my comment in the intended side of this discussion (which is not a vote). I'll be happy to summarize the above in 3 words if requested, but that would be in violation of the interpretation of the spirit of the MfD that this page recently went through (which was not a vote either). I also hope that the users commenting below will manage to neither refer to my comment ("per NikoSilver"), nor repeat the rationale of my comment with different wording (flooding), nor fall in the trap of interpreting my comment with the 3 words that could summarize it. ]] 09:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)		*In light of the new tendency to discuss the opinion rather than simply expressing and then discussing it, I tend to recognize that this is one of the apparently not-so-rare borderline cases where there is a conflict of policies that needs input by multiple users. ], explicitly prohibits the use of the apparent first component of the username ("spam"). On the other hand, ] suggests that since the user has some constructive contributions, we shouldn't ] them. Nevertheless, the user is encouraged to change their name, and if they don't then that would create an awkward precedent, so I am compelled to express my concern. The user should take this as a positive suggestion that will help them interact in the future with other users in Misplaced Pages, without the negative connotations of the name they have picked. I sincerely hope that the closing admin will manage to understand what on earth I'm talking about, and classify my comment in the intended side of this discussion (which is not a vote). I'll be happy to summarize the above in 3 words if requested, but that would be in violation of the interpretation of the spirit of the MfD that this page recently went through (which was not a vote either). I also hope that the users commenting below will manage to neither refer to my comment ("per NikoSilver"), nor repeat the rationale of my comment with different wording (flooding), nor fall in the trap of interpreting my comment with the 3 words that could summarize it. ]] 09:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
			{{#if:{{{nosubst\|}}}\|<div style="display:none;">}} {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}\|Misplaced Pages\| \|{{error:not substituted\|Rfcn1}}<div style="display:none;">}}
			==Dismas is gay==
			{{user\|Dismas is gay}}
			:Account is a clear attack on me due to my edits of the article for ]. The same person has been creating new accounts every couple days in order to add the same copyrighted image back into the article. You'll see that the user has also made edits to ]. <span style="font-family:monospace;">]</span>\|] 09:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
			{{#if:{{{nosubst\|}}}\|</div></div>}}