Revision as of 00:05, 30 July 2024 editSKAG123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,343 edits →Mention of the Benares state: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:16, 30 July 2024 edit undoFowler&fowler (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers62,979 edits →Mention of the Benares state: explanationNext edit → | ||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
::::https://doi.org/10.1177/23484489231198628 https://www.britannica.com/event/Treaties-of-Banaras ] (]) 04:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC) | ::::https://doi.org/10.1177/23484489231198628 https://www.britannica.com/event/Treaties-of-Banaras ] (]) 04:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::@] can you join in as a recent edit of yours is related to this. ] (]) 00:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC) | :::@] can you join in as a recent edit of yours is related to this. ] (]) 00:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
*Hello there: Under the Treaty of Faizabad, the British acquired the Benares division from Asif uddaulah, the Nawab of Awadh; this contained the Benares District, and in turn, Benares City. These had nothing to do with the Benares Estate, a zamindari estate, under the "Maharaja of Benares". The latter, which simply paid taxes to the British, was not a ]. It did not have a ] with the Company or the Raj. Here are the links from the ''Imperial Gazetteer of India]]'': . In particular, Benares City, which was a part of Benares Tehsil, see same page of IGI, had nothing to do with Benares Estate. Best regards, ]] 01:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:16, 30 July 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Varanasi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Varanasi has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 29, 2015.The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Kashi Vishwanath Temple in Varanasi has been destroyed and rebuilt several times and is one of the 12 Jyotirlingas Shiva temples in India? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
|
Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It should be Hinduism and not Hindu Mythology. There are three instances in this article where "Hindu Mythology" has been used. These are real places and gods that lived in this world in the past and thus it's not right to call this a Myth. VM0717 (talk) 20:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{Edit semi-protected}}
template. M.Bitton (talk) 00:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC) - Google what mythology means before you comment this sort of gibberish. Chronikhiles 06:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- "For scholars, this is very different from the vernacular usage of the term "myth" that refers to a belief that is not true. Instead, the veracity of a myth is not a defining criterion" the literal second sentence of the wikipedia page about myths/mythology. 2406:3003:2006:2640:D3:7270:32D4:D923 (talk) 12:24, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Removing people form the infobox
The infobox contains people rather than important places. I suggest removing people form the infobox and replacing it with important landmarks. SKAG123 (talk) 22:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think you mean the "infobox contained people rather than important places". This was discussed previously, see Talk:Varanasi/Archive 2#Infobox images need change for representation. Consensus appeared to be to use the pictures we have now.-- Toddy1 (talk) 05:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Mention of the Benares state
The Benares State is mentioned in multiple sources in the body article. in this section where multiple sources are cited. Therefore I think it is appreciate to mention the kingdom in the lead, as i did in this edit.
The Section:
"There were as many as 100,000 men backing the power of the Benares rajas in what later became the districts of Benares, Gorakhpur and Azamgarh. This proved a decisive advantage when the dynasty faced a rival and the nominal suzerain, the Nawab of Oudh, in the 1750s and the 1760s.
Raja Chait Singh of Benares State (r.1771–1781) An exhausting guerrilla war, waged by the Benares ruler against the Oudh camp, using his troops, forced the Nawab to withdraw his main force. The region eventually ceded by the Nawab of Oudh to the Benares State, a subordinate of the East India Company, in 1775, who recognised Benares as a family dominion.
https://archive.org/details/rulerstownsmenba0000bayl http://uqconnect.net/~zzhsoszy/ips/b/benares.html SKAG123 (talk) 19:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- The particular part you added in green in the following sentence − "Under the Treaty of Faizabad, the East India Company acquired
the city through the Banaras kingdom
in 1775" - isn't mentioned in the two accompanying sources. They only mention Benaras, nothing about the state/kingdom. The concern is about the particular sentence. Besides, what is it supposed to mean? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- The last sentences of that section state that has multiple citations states that The EIC acquired the Benares kingdom form the Nawab.
- The source do mention the Banaras Kingdom
- Empire and Revolution: The Political Life of Edmund Burke
- page 664
- Chait Singh beginning in 1775 forms an important part of Burke's basic case against Hastings.245 According to Burke, this period covered an epoch in which the obligations of Benares as an independent tributary were respected in much the
- Page 844
- Chait Singh in Benares and agreed to relieve the Wazir of some of his burdens incurred by British pensioners, as well as some of the troops stationed in his territory. At the same time, a decision was made to continue the use of
- Therefore I added “through the Banaras kingdom” since the kingdom was acquired as a subordinate based on the paragraph and sources linked above. SKAG123 (talk) 20:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'll see tomorrow. @Fowler&fowler: could you take a look? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- A few other sources I could find also stated the same thing, although it should be noted that Raja Chait Singh of Banaras' uprisings were sparked by the Second Treaty of Banaras (1775).
- https://doi.org/10.1177/23484489231198628 https://www.britannica.com/event/Treaties-of-Banaras Aditya Prakash-080 (talk) 04:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Fowler&fowler can you join in as a recent edit of yours is related to this. SKAG123 (talk) 00:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'll see tomorrow. @Fowler&fowler: could you take a look? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hello there: Under the Treaty of Faizabad, the British acquired the Benares division from Asif uddaulah, the Nawab of Awadh; this contained the Benares District, and in turn, Benares City. These had nothing to do with the Benares Estate, a zamindari estate, under the "Maharaja of Benares". The latter, which simply paid taxes to the British, was not a princely state. It did not have a subsidiary alliance with the Company or the Raj. Here are the links from the Imperial Gazetteer of India]]: Benares Estate. In particular, Benares City, which was a part of Benares Tehsil, see same page of IGI, had nothing to do with Benares Estate. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 01:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages articles that use Indian English
- Misplaced Pages good articles
- Geography and places good articles
- Misplaced Pages Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class level-4 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-4 vital articles in Geography
- GA-Class vital articles in Geography
- GA-Class Hinduism articles
- Top-importance Hinduism articles
- GA-Class Buddhism articles
- Top-importance Buddhism articles
- GA-Class India articles
- High-importance India articles
- GA-Class India articles of High-importance
- GA-Class Indian cities articles
- High-importance Indian cities articles
- GA-Class Indian cities articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Indian cities articles
- GA-Class Uttar Pradesh articles
- High-importance Uttar Pradesh articles
- GA-Class Uttar Pradesh articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Uttar Pradesh articles
- GA-Class Indian history articles
- High-importance Indian history articles
- GA-Class Indian history articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Indian history articles
- WikiProject India articles
- GA-Class WikiProject Cities articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages
- GA-Class Religion articles
- Top-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles