| Revision as of 01:38, 2 August 2024 editClarityfiend (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers236,372 edits →Boardmasters Festival line-ups: -my speculation← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:44, 2 August 2024 edit undoGazamp (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users26,657 edits +commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 21:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>]</noinclude></p> | :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 21:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>]</noinclude></p> | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. This isn't ] by a long shot. ] (]) 01:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom. This isn't ] by a long shot. ] (]) 01:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment:''' Now that the self-published source has been removed and better sources are being added, I think this discussion should primarily focus on whether the subject is notable (i.e. by assessing the sources). ] itself is not a rationale for deletion. ] (]) 11:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:44, 2 August 2024
Boardmasters Festival line-ups
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Boardmasters Festival line-ups (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested WP:BLAR. Article is a huge magnet for WP:FANCRUFT that currently cites only one source. Only verifiable source to back the information is a WP:SPS: the website itself. Jalen Folf (Bark) 21:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Events, and United Kingdom. Jalen Folf (Bark) 21:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete There is only 1 source and that does not establish notability. Dympies (talk) 15:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Largely unsourced. Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk) 22:52, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Although largely unsourced at the moment, it is clear that enough sources do exist to sustain this page (I've already managed to reference the first two years, and it's obvious to me from a quick internet search that there will be sources for other years too). It being potential fancruft does not speak to whether it should be deleted - notability is established by the reliable sources which exist elsewhere. Overall, yes, this page is poorly written, but I think that's a surmountable problem. I'll keep cleaning it up in the meantime, but I do think this one's worth keeping. Gazamp (talk) 13:02, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz 21:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This isn't Woodstock by a long shot. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Now that the self-published source has been removed and better sources are being added, I think this discussion should primarily focus on whether the subject is notable (i.e. by assessing the sources). WP:FANCRUFT itself is not a rationale for deletion. Gazamp (talk) 11:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)