| Revision as of 17:43, 24 August 2024 editJattlife121 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,551 editsNo edit summaryTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:53, 25 August 2024 edit undoSouthasianhistorian8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,289 edits →August 2024 3: ReplyTags: Reverted ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| I'm pulling back my edits because their is no reason too. You're talk page speaks enough words about this. | I'm pulling back my edits because their is no reason too. You're talk page speaks enough words about this. | ||
| ] (]) 17:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC) | ] (]) 17:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :@] | |||
| :{{tq| Instead of targeting us, you should consider focusing on improving the pages of your own community. The edits you make on Sikh pages consistently have a negative tone and intent.}} | |||
| :I can edit whatever articles I wish to, you cannot dictate what articles I can or cannot edit, and in what manner I should do so; you are not an authority on Misplaced Pages and I'm disinclined to take your "advice". | |||
| :{{tq|This is your final warning. You frequently misuse Misplaced Pages terms without fully understanding their meaning, perhaps to appear more knowledgeable.}} | |||
| :Final warning, or else you'll do what? Please bear in mind that it is not appropriate to create articles through large language models, as you clearly have done, and to deliberately add content that''' you literally made up''', multiple times, which was clearly not supported by your sources, and to synthesize content from sources to imply a conclusion if neither source explicitly states it, which again you did multiple times. Happy to bring these issues up with admins. | |||
| :{{tq|You repeatedly vandalize Sikh articles, such as the one on Vaisakhi, with malicious intent. You've also been actively proposing Sikh articles for deletion}} | |||
| :Well, numerous editors apart from myself have stated that the articles created by that specific Wikipedian are poorly sourced and written, , including an admin who has been engaged in this topic area for the past 12 years, who then went on to PROD 3 other articles made by RM-. | |||
| :{{tq|Your actions are not just unhelpful; they're harmful and must stop immediately.}} | |||
| :What's unhelpful and harmful is this bogus warning on my t/p which is clearly intended to intimidate me and prevent me from combating the rampant POV pushing in this topic area, mostly from a select few clique of editors who want to push a narrative about how their religion is the greatest, and bested and dominated all of their opponents, and how they're poor innocent victims who suffered calamities akin to the Holocaust, and that they can do no wrong. ] (]) 05:53, 25 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:53, 25 August 2024
 Archives | |||
|
|||
August 2024
Please stop. If you continue to assume ownership of articles, as you did at Vaisakhi, you may be blocked from editing. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Misplaced Pages policy.
SunnyG580 (talk) 10:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Vaisakhi, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Misplaced Pages. Comments such as, "Rv nonsense egregious pov pushing", do not follow these guidelines. SunnyG580 (talk) 10:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- @SunnyG580, I misread your version of the article and thought it said that Vaisakhi began in 1699. My apologies. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 19:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Articles for deletion
Hi @Southasianhistorian8, can you check if these articles are ok for wikipedia or else nominate them for deletion Battle of Jammu (1808) (no sources), Battle of Guler (1696) (3 sources that too unreliable), First Battle of Anandpur (1704) (single source is used), First siege of Anandpur (no notablity, title too is invented) and Hill States–Sikh wars and Conquest of Mandalgarh (no reliable history source used). I hope this would help regards. NorthSiderRock (talk) 12:53, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
As expressed by other members and noticed by myself, your persistent harassment, edits without any real substance of Sikh-related pages on Misplaced Pages has become intolerable. It's clear from your past edits that you have a particular bias against the Sikh community. Instead of targeting us, you should consider focusing on improving the pages of your own community. The edits you make on Sikh pages consistently have a negative tone and intent.
This is your final warning. You frequently misuse Misplaced Pages terms without fully understanding their meaning, perhaps to appear more knowledgeable. This behavior has escalated to an unacceptable level. It's absurd to claim that a Government of Canada website cannot be used as a source, and your edits are causing unnecessary disruption.
You repeatedly vandalize Sikh articles, such as the one on Vaisakhi, with malicious intent. You've also been actively proposing Sikh articles for deletion, and you were one of the main contributors to the Misplaced Pages page Criticism of Sikhism. Your actions are not just unhelpful; they're harmful and must stop immediately.
I'm pulling back my edits because their is no reason too. You're talk page speaks enough words about this. Jattlife121 (talk) 17:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Jattlife121
Instead of targeting us, you should consider focusing on improving the pages of your own community. The edits you make on Sikh pages consistently have a negative tone and intent.
- I can edit whatever articles I wish to, you cannot dictate what articles I can or cannot edit, and in what manner I should do so; you are not an authority on Misplaced Pages and I'm disinclined to take your "advice".
This is your final warning. You frequently misuse Misplaced Pages terms without fully understanding their meaning, perhaps to appear more knowledgeable.
- Final warning, or else you'll do what? Please bear in mind that it is not appropriate to create articles through large language models, as you clearly have done, and to deliberately add content that you literally made up, multiple times, which was clearly not supported by your sources, and to synthesize content from sources to imply a conclusion if neither source explicitly states it, which again you did multiple times. Happy to bring these issues up with admins.
You repeatedly vandalize Sikh articles, such as the one on Vaisakhi, with malicious intent. You've also been actively proposing Sikh articles for deletion
- Well, numerous editors apart from myself have stated that the articles created by that specific Wikipedian are poorly sourced and written, made with the intention of inundating Misplaced Pages with articles claiming that the Sikhs won all these battles despite being outnumbered 100 to 1, including an admin who has been engaged in this topic area for the past 12 years, who then went on to PROD 3 other articles made by RM-.
Your actions are not just unhelpful; they're harmful and must stop immediately.
- What's unhelpful and harmful is this bogus warning on my t/p which is clearly intended to intimidate me and prevent me from combating the rampant POV pushing in this topic area, mostly from a select few clique of editors who want to push a narrative about how their religion is the greatest, and bested and dominated all of their opponents, and how they're poor innocent victims who suffered calamities akin to the Holocaust, and that they can do no wrong. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 05:53, 25 August 2024 (UTC)