Misplaced Pages

Talk:Ann Coulter: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:58, 25 August 2024 editCWenger (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers20,668 edits Reverted 1 edit by 162.207.246.72 (talk): WP:NOTAFORUMTags: Twinkle Undo← Previous edit Revision as of 01:09, 4 October 2024 edit undo2405:9800:bc30:3719:e980:90d4:d6e3:949e (talk) New PointNext edit →
Line 72: Line 72:


:{{fixed}}. <span class="nowrap">–]</span> (] • ]) 19:55, 23 August 2024 (UTC) :{{fixed}}. <span class="nowrap">–]</span> (] • ]) 19:55, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

== Cheating Accusations Made Without Evidence ==
In a recent CSpan interview, Ms. Coulter accuses Democrats of getting into office by cheating. The problem with her claims is she gives no evidence. If she has the evidence, she should prove it. She can do that with a new book perhaps. Otherwise, she can only be considered slandering the people she referenced. <ref>https://www.c-span.org/video/?537661-4/ann-coulter-campaign-2024</ref>] (]) 01:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:09, 4 October 2024

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ann Coulter article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Peace dove with olive branch in its beakPlease stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconConnecticut High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCreationism: Intelligent design Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Creationism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Creationism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CreationismWikipedia:WikiProject CreationismTemplate:WikiProject CreationismCreationism
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Intelligent design task force (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconJournalism
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconConservatism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen writers High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list for Ann Coulter: edit·history·watch·refresh· Updated 2024-05-09

Priority 2
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 15, 2008Peer reviewReviewed

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

Archives
Index
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15
Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18
Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21
Archive 22Archive 23


This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Controversies

Coulter has maintained for years that she doesn't think women should have the right to vote. Here. Here she elaborates that women "have no capacity to understand how money is earned." There are many other citations about Coulter's controversial statements about women. Why isn't there anything in the Controversies section? MarkB2 04:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments on 2024 Presidential Campaign

Ann Coulter flat-out told Nikki Haley to "go back to her country", then brought up cow worship and rat temples in a rant about India. I’m not sure if that’s worth mentioning in this article, although it’s unusual since Haley is a fellow Republican. She hasn’t endorsed Trump yet, as far as I know, and it’s not clear who she actually supports for president in 2024. She really needs to tone it down a bit, because she keeps making more enemies for herself as well. 2604:2D80:6984:3800:0:0:0:EBA2 (talk) 05:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

She just told Vivek Ramaswamy that she agrees with a lot of what he says but she wouldn't vote for him because he's Indian: https://x.com/RpsAgainstTrump/status/1788388787556389044 As for your last sentence, this page is not the place to express opinions about what subjects of articles (or anyone else) ought to do. -- 2600:8802:5913:1700:29DE:3620:1F04:103F (talk) 09:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 November 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change "Coulter advocates intelligent design, a pseudoscientific antievolution ideology." to "Coulter advocates intelligent design."

The clause is irrelevant commentary and indicates bias. Simply footnote the wiki entry for intelligent design. Gsurf76 (talk) 03:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 05:20, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Jimmie (not Jimmy) Walker

Correction needed. 70.191.59.30 (talk) 18:19, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

 Already done by Blainster. –CWenger (^@) 19:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Cyberbullying Edit

Change the reference of Gus Walz having ADHD to "As a teen, he was diagnosed with nonverbal learning disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and anxiety." Per The Washington Post, Gus Walz melted hearts at the DNC, putting neurodiversity in the spotlight - By Carolyn Y. Johnson, August 22, 2024 at 4:37 p.m. EDT Stephenwmoss (talk) 21:59, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Non verbal learning disorder, not non verbal autism

In cyber bullying section it says Gus walz has nonverbal autism, which is a condition where an autistic person has not learned to speak (is non verbal). This is incorrect. What he has is a non verbal learning disability, which means a disability affecting learning non verbal skills. This is completely different.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna167804 83.251.70.249 (talk) 19:34, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

 Fixed. –CWenger (^@) 19:55, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Cheating Accusations Made Without Evidence

In a recent CSpan interview, Ms. Coulter accuses Democrats of getting into office by cheating. The problem with her claims is she gives no evidence. If she has the evidence, she should prove it. She can do that with a new book perhaps. Otherwise, she can only be considered slandering the people she referenced. 2405:9800:BC30:3719:E980:90D4:D6E3:949E (talk) 01:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

  1. https://www.c-span.org/video/?537661-4/ann-coulter-campaign-2024
Categories: