Revision as of 20:26, 30 September 2024 edit131.111.5.131 (talk) →Genocide: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:51, 2 October 2024 edit undoPincrete (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,190 edits →GenocideNext edit → | ||
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
:It was called "Uyghur Genocide", but time seems to have debunked that. Persecution is true, however. ] (]) 20:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC) | :It was called "Uyghur Genocide", but time seems to have debunked that. Persecution is true, however. ] (]) 20:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC) | ||
::Only a relatively small number of ] and states refer to this as the “Uyghur Genocide”, which is our principal naming criterion.] (]) 17:51, 2 October 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:51, 2 October 2024
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Persecution of Uyghurs in China article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
view · edit Frequently asked questions Q1: When was consensus established to name the page Persecution of Uyghurs in China? A1: The current title reflects the consensus established in the most recent move discussion (22 January 2024). Two previous widely attended move discussions (30 June 2020 and 1 April 2021) had resulted in this page being titled Uyghur genocide. Please see Logs and discussions below for the full list of move discussions. In these discussions, editors discussed reporting from reliable sources in light of WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CRITERIA, the first two times establishing an affirmative consensus that the title "Uyghur genocide" is an appropriate name for the article. The third debate, immediately following a 12 January 2024 discussion that was closed as "not moved", citing WP:NCENPOV as the naming convention guideline justifying a shift to the new name. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Persecution of Uyghurs in China. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Persecution of Uyghurs in China at the Reference desk. |
Persecution of Uyghurs in China was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A news item involving this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "In the news" column on September 2, 2022. | |||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
Misplaced Pages is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Misplaced Pages's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
|
Excessive references to Adrian Zenz
Adrian Zenz, a senior fellow at the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, is referenced 6 times in the Mass detention section and 6 times in the IUDs and birth control section. An over-reliance on research produced by him, despite that he is a heavily interested character in this issue, serves against the credibility and quality of this article. As a leading scholar his findings should be mentioned, of course, but not without qualification or alternative sources and data. NipponGinko (talk) 06:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- It’s likely more once you dig into sources as well; there’s a significant degree of circular reporting involving Zenz. I agree with your idea generally but it’s better to approach in a concrete way. What’s the specific edit or edits you want to make to address the issue? JArthur1984 (talk) 14:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- But he's not a "leading scholar" and his evidence has been endlessly debunked. 2001:1C02:3019:2750:B0C0:AADE:226D:66E (talk) 11:58, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- A single person is not a secondary source. A secondary source is a conglomeration of the author, the reviewers, editors, editing policy, and institution where the work is published, combined with the filter of the secondary review of the primary material. — Shibbolethink 13:40, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Denial of abuses
Should Uyghur genocide denial have it's own article?, I've seen a fair amount of people on the internet who deny it's happening Consistently Heinous (talk) 21:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
The Uyghur genocide has been largely been debunked so no. It should not have its own article. 81.44.54.21 (talk) 15:58, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- I’m not sure there’s enough content on the denial itself to generate a separate article, but it should definitely be included in this one. Butterdiplomat (talk) 23:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I concur with Butterdiplomat's doubts about the volume being enough to start a new article. Personally I only know of a handful of 'apologist' news sites. Bear in mind that you will need independent WP:RS saying what person X/organisation Y/ group Z claim is/isn't happening and they would specifically need to say what kind of 'denial' (denial of mistreatment/ or acknowledging mistreatment, but arguing that it doesn't constitute 'genocide' for example). I'm aware of these pitfalls because of similar articles. Pincrete (talk) 05:26, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Those are straight up tankies and I suggest you sever all contact with them 166.198.175.17 (talk) 07:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect citation?
In Background - Xinjiang conflict - People's Republic of China (1949–present), there is the sentence:
"In February 1997, a police roundup and execution of 30 suspected "separatists" during Ramadan led to large demonstrations, which led to a PLA crackdown on protesters resulting in at least nine deaths in what became known as the Ghulja incident,"
which has footnote 63, which leads to "China: Human Rights Concerns in Xinjiang" (https://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/asia/china-bck1017.htm) from Human Rights Watch. On that page, regarding the events of 1997, the page only seems to discuss two episodes, demonstrations that were suppressed in February 1997, and some bombings that took place in March 1997. The HRW page doesn't mention the execution of 30 suspected seperatists as a reason for the demonstration, or mention any cause of the demonstration, so I think the citation is used incorrectly here. Or the information may be in the article and I missed it.
I suggest that a new citation be added, which leads to the information about the 30 executed persons, instead of/in addition to the HRW citation.
I am new to wikipedia, please forgive me if there is anything that I have overlooked. L'étatisme (talk) 00:53, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Or if there is any additional information that I should provide. L'étatisme (talk) 00:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- You appear to be correct. Thanks. I've added a tag in the hope that someone will correct/remove the unsupported text/citation. Pincrete (talk) 07:16, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- I have added several citations demonstrating the links between these events, and removed the "30" number, as this is not verifiable. — Shibbolethink 13:55, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Proposed merge of Xinjiang internment camps into Persecution of Uyghurs in China
The two articles talk about the same events basically. 159.91.31.13 (talk) 16:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- You are free to suggest a merger of the articles, but I would argue that this persecution article is broader in scope than the article on the internment camps. GnocchiFan (talk) 07:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Genocide
It’s honestly super weird that this page isn’t called “Uyghur Genocide”. 71.114.123.162 (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- It was called "Uyghur Genocide", but time seems to have debunked that. Persecution is true, however. 131.111.5.131 (talk) 20:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Only a relatively small number of sources and states refer to this as the “Uyghur Genocide”, which is our principal naming criterion.Pincrete (talk) 17:51, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- Former good article nominees
- Misplaced Pages In the news articles
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-5 vital articles in History
- C-Class vital articles in History
- C-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class China-related articles
- High-importance China-related articles
- C-Class China-related articles of High-importance
- C-Class Chinese politics articles
- High-importance Chinese politics articles
- WikiProject Chinese politics articles
- WikiProject China articles
- C-Class Human rights articles
- High-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- C-Class Mass surveillance articles
- Mid-importance Mass surveillance articles
- C-Class Ethnic groups articles
- Low-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- C-Class Anthropology articles
- Low-importance Anthropology articles
- C-Class history articles
- Low-importance history articles
- Mid-importance contemporary history articles
- Contemporary history task force articles
- WikiProject History articles
- C-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- C-Class Central Asia articles
- Low-importance Central Asia articles
- WikiProject Central Asia articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class ethics articles
- Low-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- C-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Low-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- C-Class Islam-related articles
- Mid-importance Islam-related articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles
- C-Class 2010s articles
- Mid-importance 2010s articles
- WikiProject 2010s articles
- Misplaced Pages articles under general sanctions
- Misplaced Pages objectionable content