| Revision as of 03:44, 23 April 2007 editEntoaggie09 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,145 edits →REiD?: what i found← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:26, 27 November 2009 edit undo69.23.121.234 (talk) →non-sexualNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| ::You're right; that's best. Thanks. --] 14:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | ::You're right; that's best. Thanks. --] 14:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :: Yeah yeah original intents may be non-sexual and the real RULE maybe "no pressure to sexual participation" -- but reality is that sexual reactions are just as likely as any party where attractive people relax and feel safe interacting...now add physical proximity. Of course good manners is to take it out the puppy pile room if things are too urgent to wait. Again the original original intent is non-sexual. ] (]) 23:26, 27 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == REiD? == | == REiD? == | ||
Revision as of 23:26, 27 November 2009
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 10 October 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cuddle party article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
I have permission to post the cuddle party entry. Please contact reid@cuddleparty.com or marcia@cuddleparty.com for verification. They know me by nick Jade (short for Jadxia) Patten.
non-sexual
To state that cuddle parties are non-sexual is, in my opinion, POV. I'm slightly modifying the first few sentences in an attempt to make them NPOV without sacrificing information. --Allen 05:03, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- Non-sexual is the rule, therefore I put "non-sexual" after "encouraged to"; this allows for the possibilty that participants and others view the interactions as sexual.--Patrick 11:54, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- You're right; that's best. Thanks. --Allen 14:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah yeah original intents may be non-sexual and the real RULE maybe "no pressure to sexual participation" -- but reality is that sexual reactions are just as likely as any party where attractive people relax and feel safe interacting...now add physical proximity. Of course good manners is to take it out the puppy pile room if things are too urgent to wait. Again the original original intent is non-sexual. 69.23.121.234 (talk) 23:26, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
REiD?
"REiD Mihalko and Marcia Baczynski founded the organization..." Is this just a typo, or is REiD some acronym I'm not familiar with? --x-Flare-x 13:36, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- From what I gained on their website, his real name is Reid Mihalko, but he (or the web designer) likes to type it as "REiD". --Entoaggie09 03:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
"Puppy Pile" and other discussions
- A Puppy Pile is a derogatory term. if there is to be a merger, it should be based on the elimination of reference or association between cuddle party and puppy pile. people arent dogs.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by VForVendetta (talk • contribs) 08:06, 2006 March 21 (UTC)
- Hi V - thanks for discussing here. I'm not completely familiar with any association between the two terms - I need to do a little research, which will probably take me about 2 days or so to get around to. I will also look into why the Merge template was added, as I'm not familiar with all the history. Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Johntex\ 16:20, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- Hi V - I've looked into it and I disagree. If you Google "cuddle party"+"puppy pile", the very first link is cuddleparty.com and they use the term puppy pile in a non-derogatory manner to refer to something that may happen at a cuddel party. Johntex\ 21:58, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Removing Neutrality Tag
No one has made any explanation here of why the Neutrality tag was added. Therefore, I am removing it. Before adding again, please discuss here. Johntex\ 22:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Merger
If no one has any objections, I am going to merge the puppy pile stuff over to here and create a redirect there. It seems that the two words mean the same thing, but that "cuddle party" is the preferred (standard) term. Turly-burly 11:31, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- No objections here. Suggest a small note be added to the article pointing out what a 'puppy pile' is, once puppy pile is merged into this one. See cuddleparty.com definition & User:Johntex's comment that it's a sub-event of a cuddle party.
- no mention whatsoever of a puppy pile anywhere in the article now... Mathmo 03:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)