Revision as of 15:53, 25 October 2024 view sourceHemiauchenia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users59,532 edits I hardly see how suing other organisations over copyright infringement is "controversial behaviour" on ANI s partTags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:20, 26 October 2024 view source Tony Tan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,968 edits Add latest litigation informationTags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
In July 2024, ANI ] against ] in the ] — claiming to have been defamed in its article on Misplaced Pages — and sought {{INRConvert|2|c|year=2024}} in damages.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Khan |first1=Khadija |title=Why has ANI slapped a defamation case against Misplaced Pages? |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-law/why-has-ani-slapped-a-defamation-case-against-wikipedia-9443391/ |access-date=11 July 2024 |work=] |date=10 July 2024 |language=en |archive-date=14 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240714172651/https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-law/why-has-ani-slapped-a-defamation-case-against-wikipedia-9443391/ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=ANI files defamation suit against Misplaced Pages, seeks Rs 2 cr in damages |url=https://www.siasat.com/ani-files-defamation-suit-against-wikipedia-seeks-rs-2-cr-in-damages-3058599/ |website=] |date=9 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240709090900/https://www.siasat.com/ani-files-defamation-suit-against-wikipedia-seeks-rs-2-cr-in-damages-3058599/ |archive-date=9 July 2024 |url-status=live |access-date=9 July 2024 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=News agency ANI files Rs 2 crore defamation suit against Misplaced Pages in Delhi High Court |url=https://www.deccanherald.com/business/companies/news-agency-ani-files-rs-2-crore-defamation-suit-against-wikipedia-in-delhi-high-court-3098159 |website=] |date=9 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240709090858/https://www.deccanherald.com/business/companies/news-agency-ani-files-rs-2-crore-defamation-suit-against-wikipedia-in-delhi-high-court-3098159 |archive-date=9 July 2024 |url-status=live |access-date=9 July 2024 |language=en}}</ref> On 5 September, the Court threatened to hold Wikimedia guilty of contempt for failing to disclose information about the editors who had made changes to the article and warned that Misplaced Pages might be blocked in India upon further non-compliance. The judge on the case stated "If you don't like India, please don't work in India... We will ask government to block your site".<ref>{{cite news |title=Will ask government to block Misplaced Pages: Delhi High Court issues contempt order in ANI case |url=https://www.deccanherald.com/india/delhi/will-ask-government-to-block-wikipedia-delhi-high-court-issues-contempt-order-in-ani-case-3177771 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240905101222/https://www.deccanherald.com/india/delhi/will-ask-government-to-block-wikipedia-delhi-high-court-issues-contempt-order-in-ani-case-3177771 |archive-date=5 September 2024 |url-status=live |work=] |access-date=5 September 2024}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Kakkar |first=Shruti |date=5 September 2024 |title=Delhi HC pulls up Misplaced Pages for non-compliance of order |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/delhi-news/delhi-hc-pulls-up-wikipedia-for-non-compliance-of-order-101725545466043.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240905190702/https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/delhi-news/delhi-hc-pulls-up-wikipedia-for-non-compliance-of-order-101725545466043.html |archive-date=5 September 2024 |access-date=9 September 2024 |work=]}}</ref> In response, Wikimedia emphasized that the information in the article was supported by multiple reliable secondary sources.<ref name="Misplaced Pages-caution">{{cite news |title=Delhi High Court cautions Misplaced Pages for non-compliance of order |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/delhi-high-court-cautions-wikipedia-for-non-compliance-of-order/article68610761.ece |date=5 September 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240914011253/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/delhi-high-court-cautions-wikipedia-for-non-compliance-of-order/article68610761.ece |archive-date=14 September 2024 |url-status=live |work=] |access-date=15 September 2024 |language=en-IN |issn=0971-751X}}</ref> Justice ] said "I think nothing can be worse for a news agency than to be called a puppet of an intelligence agency, stooge of the government. If that is true, the credibility goes."<ref name="Bar and Bench 21 October 2024">{{cite news |last1=Srivastava |first1=Bhavini |title=Nothing worse than calling news agency a government stooge: Delhi High Court in ANI vs Misplaced Pages |url=https://www.barandbench.com/news/nothing-worse-than-calling-news-agency-govt-stooge-delhi-high-court-ani-wikipedia |access-date=21 October 2024 |work=Bar and Bench |date=21 October 2024 |language=en}}</ref> | In July 2024, ANI ] against ] in the ] — claiming to have been defamed in its article on Misplaced Pages — and sought {{INRConvert|2|c|year=2024}} in damages.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Khan |first1=Khadija |title=Why has ANI slapped a defamation case against Misplaced Pages? |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-law/why-has-ani-slapped-a-defamation-case-against-wikipedia-9443391/ |access-date=11 July 2024 |work=] |date=10 July 2024 |language=en |archive-date=14 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240714172651/https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-law/why-has-ani-slapped-a-defamation-case-against-wikipedia-9443391/ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=ANI files defamation suit against Misplaced Pages, seeks Rs 2 cr in damages |url=https://www.siasat.com/ani-files-defamation-suit-against-wikipedia-seeks-rs-2-cr-in-damages-3058599/ |website=] |date=9 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240709090900/https://www.siasat.com/ani-files-defamation-suit-against-wikipedia-seeks-rs-2-cr-in-damages-3058599/ |archive-date=9 July 2024 |url-status=live |access-date=9 July 2024 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=News agency ANI files Rs 2 crore defamation suit against Misplaced Pages in Delhi High Court |url=https://www.deccanherald.com/business/companies/news-agency-ani-files-rs-2-crore-defamation-suit-against-wikipedia-in-delhi-high-court-3098159 |website=] |date=9 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240709090858/https://www.deccanherald.com/business/companies/news-agency-ani-files-rs-2-crore-defamation-suit-against-wikipedia-in-delhi-high-court-3098159 |archive-date=9 July 2024 |url-status=live |access-date=9 July 2024 |language=en}}</ref> On 5 September, the Court threatened to hold Wikimedia guilty of contempt for failing to disclose information about the editors who had made changes to the article and warned that Misplaced Pages might be blocked in India upon further non-compliance. The judge on the case stated "If you don't like India, please don't work in India... We will ask government to block your site".<ref>{{cite news |title=Will ask government to block Misplaced Pages: Delhi High Court issues contempt order in ANI case |url=https://www.deccanherald.com/india/delhi/will-ask-government-to-block-wikipedia-delhi-high-court-issues-contempt-order-in-ani-case-3177771 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240905101222/https://www.deccanherald.com/india/delhi/will-ask-government-to-block-wikipedia-delhi-high-court-issues-contempt-order-in-ani-case-3177771 |archive-date=5 September 2024 |url-status=live |work=] |access-date=5 September 2024}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Kakkar |first=Shruti |date=5 September 2024 |title=Delhi HC pulls up Misplaced Pages for non-compliance of order |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/delhi-news/delhi-hc-pulls-up-wikipedia-for-non-compliance-of-order-101725545466043.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240905190702/https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/delhi-news/delhi-hc-pulls-up-wikipedia-for-non-compliance-of-order-101725545466043.html |archive-date=5 September 2024 |access-date=9 September 2024 |work=]}}</ref> In response, Wikimedia emphasized that the information in the article was supported by multiple reliable secondary sources.<ref name="Misplaced Pages-caution">{{cite news |title=Delhi High Court cautions Misplaced Pages for non-compliance of order |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/delhi-high-court-cautions-wikipedia-for-non-compliance-of-order/article68610761.ece |date=5 September 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240914011253/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/delhi-high-court-cautions-wikipedia-for-non-compliance-of-order/article68610761.ece |archive-date=14 September 2024 |url-status=live |work=] |access-date=15 September 2024 |language=en-IN |issn=0971-751X}}</ref> Justice ] said "I think nothing can be worse for a news agency than to be called a puppet of an intelligence agency, stooge of the government. If that is true, the credibility goes."<ref name="Bar and Bench 21 October 2024">{{cite news |last1=Srivastava |first1=Bhavini |title=Nothing worse than calling news agency a government stooge: Delhi High Court in ANI vs Misplaced Pages |url=https://www.barandbench.com/news/nothing-worse-than-calling-news-agency-govt-stooge-delhi-high-court-ani-wikipedia |access-date=21 October 2024 |work=Bar and Bench |date=21 October 2024 |language=en}}</ref> | ||
Nishant Shah, professor of Global Media at the ] and faculty associate at Harvard's ], and journalist ] characterized the judge's order to WMF to release the identities of the editors who made the edits as censorship and a threat to the flow of information.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-09-17 |title=Why the case against Misplaced Pages in India is a challenge to freedom of speech and information |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/why-case-wikipedia-india-challenge-freedom-speech-information-9572234/ |access-date=2024-10-26 |website=The Indian Express |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Lobo |first=Simone |date=2024-10-10 |title=ANI case: How Delhi HC’s Misplaced Pages ban threat affects India |url=https://www.medianama.com/2024/10/223-video-delhi-hc-action-wikipedia-ani-defamation-lawsuit-affect-india/ |access-date=2024-10-26 |website=MEDIANAMA |language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
On 14 October, Delhi High Court justices ] and Tushar Rao Gedela objected to the creation of an English Misplaced Pages article about the defamation case, saying the article "disclos something about a sub-judice matter" and "will have to be taken down", and scheduled review for 16 October.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Srivastava |first=Bhavini |date=2024-10-14 |title=Delhi High Court slams Misplaced Pages for refusal to divulge identity of those who edited ANI's page |url=https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/delhi-high-court-slams-wikipedia-refusal-divulge-identity-those-edited-ani-page |access-date=2024-10-26 |website=Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Staff |first=Scroll |date=2024-10-14 |title=‘Extremely disturbing’: Delhi HC on Misplaced Pages’s refusal to identify ANI page editors |url=https://scroll.in/latest/1074442/extremely-disturbing-delhi-hc-on-wikipedias-refusal-to-identify-ani-page-editors |access-date=2024-10-26 |website=Scroll.in |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Thapliyal |first=Nupur |date=2024-10-14 |title=Delhi High Court Takes Exception To Misplaced Pages Page On Pending Defamation Suit By ANI, Says Majesty Of Court Is Over And Above Anyone |url=https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-wikipedia-ani-defamation-cant-threaten-judge-272349 |access-date=2024-10-26 |website=www.livelaw.in |language=en}}</ref> On 16 October, the court stated that "Accordingly, in the interim, this Court directs that the pages on Misplaced Pages pertaining to the single judge as well as discussion of the observations of division bench be taken down or deleted within 36 hours".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Thapliyal |first=Nupur |date=2024-10-16 |title='Prima Facie Contemptuous': Delhi High Court Orders Take Down Of Misplaced Pages Page On Pending Defamation Suit By ANI |url=https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/prima-facie-contemptuous-delhi-high-court-orders-deletion-of-wikipedia-page-on-pending-defamation-suit-by-ani-272578 |access-date=2024-10-26 |website=www.livelaw.in |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last= |first= |date=2024-10-16 |title=ANI vs Misplaced Pages defamation case: Delhi High Court orders Wikimedia to take down ANI page within 36 hours |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ani-vs-wikipedia-defamation-case-delhi-high-court-orders-wikimedia-to-take-down-ani-page-within-36-hours/article68759850.ece |access-date=2024-10-26 |work=The Hindu |language=en-IN |issn=0971-751X}}</ref> | |||
On 21 October, the Wikimedia Foundation suspended access to the article for ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Asian_News_International_vs._Wikimedia_Foundation&diff=prev&oldid=1252542744 |access-date=2024-10-26 |website=en.wikipedia.org |language=en}}</ref> | |||
== Content == | == Content == |
Revision as of 05:20, 26 October 2024
Indian news agency
Company type | News agency |
---|---|
Industry | Media, news media |
Founded | 9 December 1971; 53 years ago (1971-12-09) |
Founder | Prem Prakash |
Headquarters | New Delhi |
Area served | India, South Asia |
Key people | |
Owner | ANI Media Private Limited |
Website | www |
Asian News International (ANI) is an Indian news agency that offers syndicated multimedia news feed to news bureaus in India and elsewhere. The company was established by Prem Prakash in 1971 and, under the name TVNF, it soon became the first agency in India to syndicate video news. Drawing upon connections within the Indian government, ANI expanded greatly during the early 2000s. After a period of downturn, the company regained a monopoly position; as of 2019, it is the biggest television news agency in India. In 2018, it reported revenues of ₹68.23 crore and a net profit of ₹9.91 crore.
Investigations into the company have alleged that it has served as a mouthpiece for the incumbent government of India for decades, especially after the election of the Bharatiya Janata Party in 2014. ANI has been accused of amplifying a vast network of fake news websites spreading pro-government and anti-Pakistan propaganda.
The agency has consistently reported misinformation, has employed video editors to misrepresent media sources, and has quoted sources that do not exist. It has also been accused of favouring revenue output over ill-treated employees.
History
Establishment and early years (1971–2000)
Prem Prakash started his career in the field of photography, working for Visnews (and Reuters) as a photojournalist, where he went on to cover some of the most significant historical events in post-independence India. A significant figure in the domain of news and documentary film-making by the 1970s, he commanded considerable respect among foreign journalists and film-makers, and received the MBE. In 1971, Prem established ANI (initially TVNF, India's first television news feature agency), which gained influence within the Congress Government. TVNF played a key role in fulfilling Indira Gandhi's wishes of showcasing a positive image of India. It produced numerous films for Doordarshan and went on to gain a monopoly in the sector.
Smita Prakash, an alumna of the Indian Institute of Mass Communication, joined ANI in 1986 as an intern and later became a full-time employee. The daughter of Inna Ramamohan Rao, former director of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, she married Prem's son Sanjiv in 1988, which furthered ANI's access within the government. In 1993, Reuters purchased a stake in ANI, and it was allowed to exert a complete monopoly over their India feed.
Expansion (2000–present)
By 2000, India saw a boom of private 24x7 news channels; however, unsustainable revenue models meant that they lacked the capacity to hire video-reporters across the country. This allowed a massive expansion of ANI's domestic video-production capacities at the behest of Sanjiv, who rose through the ranks. Smita also rose through the ranks with him. Asian Films TV was incorporated in 2000 to provide feed for newspapers and periodicals. The Caravan though notes that most of its foot-soldiers were low-cost recruits, who had little to do with journalism.
In 2000, the NDA government launched a Kashmir-based regional channel—DD Kashir, and ANI was allowed to produce its programs. By the end of 2005, ANI's business-model was faring impressively on a consistent basis and it shifted its office out of Gole Market, to a new five-storey building in R. K. Puram. ANI continued to be trusted by the upcoming UPA governments, to the extent that the Ministry of External Affairs chose Smita to be a part of the two-member contingent of Indian journalists at both of the joint press conferences between the incumbent prime ministers of India and the United States.
In the later 2000s, the increasing charges for ANI feed and low quality of its journalism, coupled with the introduction of broadcast vans, led to several national and regional channels unsubscribing ANI. The launch of UNI TV in 2010 by Yashwant Deshmukh gave stiff competition as well. However, Ishaan Prakash, Smita's son who joined the company in 2011, procured multiple units of LiveU, expanded ANI's overseas bureaus and signed contracts with multiple state governments and union ministries. A monopoly was again re-created and most of its competitors eventually shut down. By late 2011, ANI accounted for about 99% of the Reuters feed from India, and in FY 2017–18, it was paid ₹2.54 crore for the services. Archive videos were sold at rates as high as ₹1,000 per second; in FY 2017–18, the firm reported revenues of ₹68.23 crore and a net profit of ₹9.91 crore.
Under new management, ANI has been accused of practicing an aggressive model of journalism focused on maximum revenue output, where journalists were considered dispensable. Multiple employees have accused ANI of not having any human resource management system and ill-treating its ex-employees.
Litigation against other organisations
In July 2024, ANI sued Press Trust of India over copyright infringement alleging that it had plagiarized ANI's video clips of Spicejet aircraft's AC breakdown and sought 2 crore rupees in damages. In September 2024, ANI sued Netflix over the web series IC 814: The Kandahar Hijack for copyright infringement, alleging that the latter had used video clips in its Kandahar Hijack series without ANI's permission.
In July 2024, ANI filed a lawsuit against Wikimedia Foundation in the Delhi High Court — claiming to have been defamed in its article on Misplaced Pages — and sought ₹2 crore (US$230,000) in damages. On 5 September, the Court threatened to hold Wikimedia guilty of contempt for failing to disclose information about the editors who had made changes to the article and warned that Misplaced Pages might be blocked in India upon further non-compliance. The judge on the case stated "If you don't like India, please don't work in India... We will ask government to block your site". In response, Wikimedia emphasized that the information in the article was supported by multiple reliable secondary sources. Justice Manmohan said "I think nothing can be worse for a news agency than to be called a puppet of an intelligence agency, stooge of the government. If that is true, the credibility goes."
Nishant Shah, professor of Global Media at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and faculty associate at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, and journalist Nikhil Pahwa characterized the judge's order to WMF to release the identities of the editors who made the edits as censorship and a threat to the flow of information.
On 14 October, Delhi High Court justices Manmohan and Tushar Rao Gedela objected to the creation of an English Misplaced Pages article about the defamation case, saying the article "disclos something about a sub-judice matter" and "will have to be taken down", and scheduled review for 16 October. On 16 October, the court stated that "Accordingly, in the interim, this Court directs that the pages on Misplaced Pages pertaining to the single judge as well as discussion of the observations of division bench be taken down or deleted within 36 hours".
On 21 October, the Wikimedia Foundation suspended access to the article for Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation.
Content
Propaganda
Long-form reports by The Caravan and The Ken, along with reports by other media watchdogs have described the agency as serving as a propaganda tool of the incumbent government.
Reporting in The Caravan has stated that for decades under Congress rule, ANI effectively served as the external publicity division of Ministry of External Affairs, showing the Army in a positive light and suppressing news about any internal discontent; the private nature of the organization and the repute of its founder gave an air of non-partisan legitimacy to their videos. During the peak spans of militancy in the Kashmir conflict, ANI was the near-sole purveyor of video-footage, especially with Rao having been recruited as the media advisor to the state. ANI grew even closer to the government after Bharatiya Janata Party was elected to power in 2014; effects have ranged from sympathetic covering of the political campaigns by BJP to reporters being highly confrontational, when dealing with politicians from opposition parties.
In 2020, an investigation by EU DisinfoLab concluded that ANI was publishing pro-Modi government disinformation with opinion pieces and news content, including opinion pieces falsely attributed to European politicians and that they were sourcing material from a vast network of fake news websites run by the "Srivastava Group". The report also concluded that they had spread anti-Pakistan and sometimes anti-China disinformation with the primary aim of this fake news coverage was to "discredit Pakistan" in international forums. The report noted that mainstream Indian news media regularly relies on content provided by ANI, and that ANI had on several occasions provided legitimacy and coverage to the entire "influence operation" run by the fake news network, which relied "more on ANI than on any other distribution channel" "both credibility and a wide reach to its content". ANI is also believed to have gained access to India's intelligence establishment in recent years; in foreign affairs many of its videos depicted protests by fringe lobby groups and activists as if they were large-scale and mainstream.
Misinformation
Fact checkers certified by the Poynter Institute's International Fact-Checking Network have accused ANI of misreporting events. The Caravan found several video footages from ANI, wherein logos of random television channels from Pakistan, along with Urdu tickers, were superimposed on news showcasing India in a positive light; their video editors have admitted to forging clips.
In July 2021, ANI falsely reported that Chinese weightlifter Hou Zhihui, who won the gold medal in the women's 49 kg weightlifting at the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo, would be tested by the International Testing Agency (ITA) for doping, according to ANI's unnamed source. The article also stated that Indian weightlifter Mirabai Chanu, who won silver medal in the same event, would be upgraded to a gold medal if the tests were positive. The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and ITA debunked the reports, saying they knew nothing of such tests being carried out and that any developments would be transparently reported on their website.
In April 2023, ANI falsely reported a photo of a padlocked grave in Hyderabad, India, as being from Pakistan, claiming it was locked to prevent necrophilia. Fact-checking revealed that the grave was actually secured to prevent unauthorized burials and to protect it from being trampled. In July 2023, ANI falsely blamed Muslims for the sexual assault and rape of two Kuki women during the 2023 Manipur violence. ANI later apologized for the mistake, blaming erroneous reading of tweets posted by the Manipur police.
In August 2024, ANI disseminated misinformation regarding attacks on Hindus in Bangladesh. The controversy erupted after ANI shared a video on social media, which falsely depicted a Hindu father pleading for justice for his missing son. The man in the video was later identified as a Muslim, named Mohammad Suny Hawlader, who was actually seeking justice for his missing son. The video, initially shared by ANI, was quickly picked up by right-wing accounts and other media outlets that rely on ANI's feed, further spreading the false narrative. Despite ANI deleting the video after being called out for the misleading content, the misinformation continued to circulate on various social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, perpetuating the false narrative.
On 20 September 2024, actor Salman Khan has sought an apology from ANI and the lawyers representing the two individuals accused of discharging firearms outside his residence. This request follows allegations made by ANI that Khan has "known relations" with the D-Company, a group associated with underworld gangster Dawood Ibrahim.
See also
- United News of India, multilingual news agency in India
References
- "ANI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED – Company, directors and contact details". zaubacorp.com. Archived from the original on 9 November 2020. Retrieved 22 June 2018.
- "Terms & Conditions". Asian News International. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 22 June 2018.
- Shrivastava, K. M. (2007). News Agencies from Pigeon to Internet. Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd. ISBN 978-1-932705-67-6. Archived from the original on 11 July 2024. Retrieved 17 May 2018.
- Paterson, Chris A.; Sreberny, Annabelle (2004). International News in the 21st Century. Georgetown University Press. p. 122. ISBN 978-1-86020-596-5.
- "Footaging It Fleetly". Outlook. Archived from the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2019.
- Saxena, Sunil. Web Journalism-The Craft & Technology. Tata McGraw-HillEducation. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-07-068083-8. Archived from the original on 11 July 2024. Retrieved 17 May 2018.
- ^ Ahluwalia, Harveen; Srivilasan, Pranav (21 October 2018). "How ANI quietly built a monopoly". The Ken. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
- ^ Donthi, Praveen (1 March 2019). "The Image Makers : How ANI Reports The Government's Version Of Truth". The Caravan. Archived from the original on 8 February 2023. Retrieved 7 December 2019.
- ^ Hussain, Abid; Menon, Shruti (10 December 2020). "The dead professor and the vast pro-India disinformation campaign". BBC News. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2020.
The network was designed primarily to "discredit Pakistan internationally" and influence decision-making at the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and European Parliament, EU DisinfoLab said.
- ^ Saeed, Saim; Kayali, Laura (9 December 2020). "New pro-India EU website enrolling MEPs campaigns against Pakistan". Politico. Archived from the original on 6 January 2021. Retrieved 9 December 2020.
- ^ Rej, Abhijnan (12 October 2020). "EU Non-Profit Unearths Massive Indian Disinformation Campaign". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 11 December 2020.
- ^ Chaudhuri, Pooja (21 October 2018). "ANI – A tale of inadvertent errors and oversights". Alt News. Archived from the original on 4 December 2022. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
- "Modi Govt's Go-To News Agency ANI 'Quotes Geopolitical Experts, Think Tanks That Don't Exist': Report". The Wire (India). 23 February 2023. Retrieved 19 September 2024.
- "'Stealing my feeds': ANI sues PTI for plagiarism, copyright breach, seeks Rs 2 crore". Newslaundry. 5 July 2024. Archived from the original on 9 September 2024. Retrieved 9 September 2024.
- "'Brandname being tarnished': ANI sues Netflix for using its content in 'Kandahar Hijack' series". The Times of India. 9 September 2024. Retrieved 9 September 2024.
- Khan, Khadija (10 July 2024). "Why has ANI slapped a defamation case against Misplaced Pages?". The Indian Express. Archived from the original on 14 July 2024. Retrieved 11 July 2024.
- "ANI files defamation suit against Misplaced Pages, seeks Rs 2 cr in damages". The Siasat Daily. 9 July 2024. Archived from the original on 9 July 2024. Retrieved 9 July 2024.
- "News agency ANI files Rs 2 crore defamation suit against Misplaced Pages in Delhi High Court". Deccan Herald. 9 July 2024. Archived from the original on 9 July 2024. Retrieved 9 July 2024.
- "Will ask government to block Misplaced Pages: Delhi High Court issues contempt order in ANI case". Deccan Herald. Archived from the original on 5 September 2024. Retrieved 5 September 2024.
- Kakkar, Shruti (5 September 2024). "Delhi HC pulls up Misplaced Pages for non-compliance of order". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 5 September 2024. Retrieved 9 September 2024.
- "Delhi High Court cautions Misplaced Pages for non-compliance of order". The Hindu. 5 September 2024. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 14 September 2024. Retrieved 15 September 2024.
- Srivastava, Bhavini (21 October 2024). "Nothing worse than calling news agency a government stooge: Delhi High Court in ANI vs Misplaced Pages". Bar and Bench. Retrieved 21 October 2024.
- "Why the case against Misplaced Pages in India is a challenge to freedom of speech and information". The Indian Express. 17 September 2024. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
- Lobo, Simone (10 October 2024). "ANI case: How Delhi HC's Misplaced Pages ban threat affects India". MEDIANAMA. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
- Srivastava, Bhavini (14 October 2024). "Delhi High Court slams Misplaced Pages for refusal to divulge identity of those who edited ANI's page". Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
- Staff, Scroll (14 October 2024). "'Extremely disturbing': Delhi HC on Misplaced Pages's refusal to identify ANI page editors". Scroll.in. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
- Thapliyal, Nupur (14 October 2024). "Delhi High Court Takes Exception To Misplaced Pages Page On Pending Defamation Suit By ANI, Says Majesty Of Court Is Over And Above Anyone". www.livelaw.in. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
- Thapliyal, Nupur (16 October 2024). "'Prima Facie Contemptuous': Delhi High Court Orders Take Down Of Misplaced Pages Page On Pending Defamation Suit By ANI". www.livelaw.in. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
- "ANI vs Misplaced Pages defamation case: Delhi High Court orders Wikimedia to take down ANI page within 36 hours". The Hindu. 16 October 2024. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
- "Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages". en.wikipedia.org. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
- Tiwari, Ayush (18 September 2019). "Meet ANI's 'European experts' on Kashmir. They're experts all right — just not on Kashmir". Newslaundry. Archived from the original on 11 January 2020. Retrieved 4 January 2019.
- Dhillon, Amrit (5 January 2019). "Indian PM lampooned for 'manufactured' interview". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 11 July 2024. Retrieved 29 December 2019.
- Alaphilippe, Gary Machado Alexandre; Adamczyk, Roman; Grégoire, Antoine (9 December 2020). "Indian Chronicles: deep dive into a 15-year operation targeting the EU and UN to serve Indian interests". EU DisinfoLab. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 11 December 2020.
- "ANI, Srivastava Group named in massive EU disinformation campaign to promote Modi government's interests". The Caravan. 9 December 2020. Archived from the original on 10 December 2020. Retrieved 11 December 2020.
- Sénécat, Adrien (9 December 2020). "Une vaste campagne de désinformation et d'influence indienne en Europe dévoilée". Le Monde (in French). Archived from the original on 11 December 2020. Retrieved 11 December 2020.
- "Indian media fake news about Olympic weightlifting doping takes off around Asia - Insidethegames.biz - The Verified". theverified.date. 29 July 2021. Archived from the original on 3 August 2021.
- Unnikrishnan, Dilip (1 August 2021). "Unverified Doping Charge Against Mirabai Chanu's Opponent Goes Viral". Boom. Archived from the original on 3 August 2021. Retrieved 9 September 2024.
- "Photo of Hyderabad grave falsely reported as being from Pakistan". The Siasat Daily. 30 April 2023. Archived from the original on 9 September 2024. Retrieved 5 September 2024.
- "Kuki viral video: ANI apologises for 'inadvertently' claiming Muslim man was arrested". Newslaundry. 21 July 2023. Archived from the original on 22 July 2023. Retrieved 22 July 2023.
- ^ "ANI Faces Criticism for Sharing Fake Video About Attack on Hindus in Bangladesh". Clarion India. 14 August 2024. Archived from the original on 5 September 2024. Retrieved 5 September 2024.
- Bharathi, Vartha (14 August 2024). "ANI faces backlash for sharing fake news on attack on Hindus in Bangladesh". english.varthabharati.in. Archived from the original on 15 August 2024. Retrieved 5 September 2024.
- Team, N. L. (20 September 2024). "Salman Khan demands apology from ANI for report 'linking him to D-Company'". Newslaundry. Retrieved 18 October 2024.
External links
- Official website
- Explained: What's ANI vs Misplaced Pages legal battle all about? 2024 Newslaundry video