Revision as of 11:39, 30 October 2024 editIamextremelygayokay (talk | contribs)232 edits →Rohingya genocide: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:40, 30 October 2024 edit undoIamextremelygayokay (talk | contribs)232 edits →Rohingya genocide: deleting a reply that i accidentally posted twiceNext edit → | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
:I think there could be some improvement here. -] (]) 08:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | :I think there could be some improvement here. -] (]) 08:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
::@] I fully agree with everything said here. The genocide of the Rohingya is far too notable and significant to be confined to only one small section of this article. I also noticed that the topic of Rohingya refugees is mentioned in Demographics> Ethnic groups, but it had no word of refugees past 1991. To rectify this, I added this sentence: "Since August 2017, an estimated 23,000-43,700 Rohingya have been killed in the ongoing ], and another 730,000 have fled to Bangladesh.", with three added sources. (Hopefully it doesn't get reverted by some genocide denier, ugh.) Regarding your concern about the "see also" link, it appears as though someone thankfully changed it to "Rohingya genocide" to match the page title (unless you're the one who did that, in which case nice!!) Thank you for pointing all this out, by the way - it's really important stuff. ] (]) 11:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC) | ::@] I fully agree with everything said here. The genocide of the Rohingya is far too notable and significant to be confined to only one small section of this article. I also noticed that the topic of Rohingya refugees is mentioned in Demographics> Ethnic groups, but it had no word of refugees past 1991. To rectify this, I added this sentence: "Since August 2017, an estimated 23,000-43,700 Rohingya have been killed in the ongoing ], and another 730,000 have fled to Bangladesh.", with three added sources. (Hopefully it doesn't get reverted by some genocide denier, ugh.) Regarding your concern about the "see also" link, it appears as though someone thankfully changed it to "Rohingya genocide" to match the page title (unless you're the one who did that, in which case nice!!) Thank you for pointing all this out, by the way - it's really important stuff. ] (]) 11:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
@] I fully agree with everything said here. The genocide of the Rohingya is far too notable and significant to be confined to only one small section of this article. I also noticed that the topic of Rohingya refugees is mentioned in Demographics> Ethnic groups, but it had no word of refugees past 1991. To rectify this, I added this sentence: "Since August 2017, an estimated 23,000-43,700 Rohingya have been killed in the ongoing ], and another 730,000 have fled to Bangladesh.", with three added sources. (Hopefully it doesn't get reverted by some genocide denier, ugh.) Regarding your concern about the "see also" link, it appears as though someone thankfully changed it to "Rohingya genocide" to match the page title (unless you're the one who did that, in which case nice!!) Thank you for pointing all this out, by the way - it's really important stuff. - ] (]) 11:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:40, 30 October 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Myanmar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Myanmar is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Other talk page banners | |||||||
|
Archives | ||||||||||||||
Index
|
||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Semi-protected edit request on 29 November 2023burma
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
121.121.169.99 (talk) 20:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. --AntiDionysius (talk) 20:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 5 December 2023
This edit request to Burma has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Yeminthein2023 (talk) 09:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Liu1126 (talk) 11:29, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Myanmar /en.wikipedia.org/Myanmar
Global edit find Pagan replace Bagan. WaTaAng (talk) 19:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not done Both terms exist and have their own Wikipages: Bagan and Pagan Kingdom. Can be done only on a case-by-case basis after a careful read. Rasnaboy (talk) 05:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Kingdom of Ava missing under 'Formation'
The Kingdom of Ava is missing in the history section between Pagan and Taungoo Era. https://en.wikipedia.org/Kingdom_of_Ava 77.187.165.0 (talk) 02:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Rhoticity of English pronunciation of "Myanmar"/"Burma"
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The "Etymology" section would benefit from a reference to the article Rhoticity in English
Please change "non-rhotic variety of English" to "non-rhotic variety of English" Troglodv (talk) 22:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 05:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I appreciate it! Troglodv (talk) 20:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Rohingya genocide
I noticed that the history section largely jumps from 2016 to 2020 without mentioning the Rohingya persecution in 2017, which seems a notable event that got a lot of international attention, at a minimum resulted in mass migration, etc. Is there a reason it wouldn't be appropriate to mention here? -KaJunl (talk) 08:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Further comment: I do see that the topic is presented within Government and politics> Human rights and internal conflicts> Genocide allegations and crimes against Rohingya people.
- Given the international attention, demographic changes to the country, refugee crisis, etc., I am not sure it doesn't belong in "history" too.
- However, even within the aforementioned section, the "2013 onwards" seems to have minimal commentary on the 2016-2017 period. At the beginning of the genocide allegations section, there is a "see also" link to "2016–17 Rohingya persecution in Myanmar" (which is not the current name of the linked article - I'd think we should link to the current name regardless rather than engaging in a separate debate) but those events aren't really mentioned much in the "2013 onwards" section of this article.
- I think there could be some improvement here. -KaJunl (talk) 08:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- @KaJunl I fully agree with everything said here. The genocide of the Rohingya is far too notable and significant to be confined to only one small section of this article. I also noticed that the topic of Rohingya refugees is mentioned in Demographics> Ethnic groups, but it had no word of refugees past 1991. To rectify this, I added this sentence: "Since August 2017, an estimated 23,000-43,700 Rohingya have been killed in the ongoing Rohingya genocide, and another 730,000 have fled to Bangladesh.", with three added sources. (Hopefully it doesn't get reverted by some genocide denier, ugh.) Regarding your concern about the "see also" link, it appears as though someone thankfully changed it to "Rohingya genocide" to match the page title (unless you're the one who did that, in which case nice!!) Thank you for pointing all this out, by the way - it's really important stuff. Iamextremelygayokay (talk) 11:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages articles that use British English
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class level-3 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-3 vital articles in Geography
- B-Class vital articles in Geography
- B-Class country articles
- WikiProject Countries articles
- B-Class Myanmar articles
- Top-importance Myanmar articles
- WikiProject Myanmar articles
- B-Class Asia articles
- Top-importance Asia articles
- WikiProject Asia articles
- B-Class Southeast Asia articles
- Top-importance Southeast Asia articles
- WikiProject Southeast Asia articles
- B-Class Buddhism articles
- High-importance Buddhism articles
- Misplaced Pages pages referenced by the press
- Pages in the Misplaced Pages Top 25 Report