| Revision as of 23:02, 12 November 2024 editNyttend (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators286,364 edits →Khalistan movement: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:21, 12 November 2024 edit undoSouthasianhistorian8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,289 edits →Khalistan movement: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| Please read ]: by reverting to add a large quantity of content unrelated to the subject, you're causing the whole situation to adopt a significantly non-neutral point of view. Since your talk page archives have plenty of NPOV warnings, it's clear that you're familiar with our policies, so if you repeatedly restore this content, I'll request a block. ] (]) 23:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC) | Please read ]: by reverting to add a large quantity of content unrelated to the subject, you're causing the whole situation to adopt a significantly non-neutral point of view. Since your talk page archives have plenty of NPOV warnings, it's clear that you're familiar with our policies, so if you repeatedly restore this content, I'll request a block. ] (]) 23:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :Hey @]. Thanks for your message here. I'm hoping we can have a respectful discussion on the article's t/p. I will not revert your latest edit there, but I disagree with your characterization of the removed content as "irrelevant", because it clearly is, at least to some extent. ] (]) 23:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:21, 12 November 2024
 Archives | |||
|
|||
Khalistan movement
Please read WP:COAT: by reverting to add a large quantity of content unrelated to the subject, you're causing the whole situation to adopt a significantly non-neutral point of view. Since your talk page archives have plenty of NPOV warnings, it's clear that you're familiar with our policies, so if you repeatedly restore this content, I'll request a block. Nyttend (talk) 23:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Nyttend. Thanks for your message here. I'm hoping we can have a respectful discussion on the article's t/p. I will not revert your latest edit there, but I disagree with your characterization of the removed content as "irrelevant", because it clearly is, at least to some extent. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 23:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)