| Revision as of 23:21, 12 November 2024 editSouthasianhistorian8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,289 edits →Khalistan movement: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:37, 14 November 2024 edit undoGhostOfDanGurney (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,822 edits →Khalistan movement: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :Hey @]. Thanks for your message here. I'm hoping we can have a respectful discussion on the article's t/p. I will not revert your latest edit there, but I disagree with your characterization of the removed content as "irrelevant", because it clearly is, at least to some extent. ] (]) 23:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC) | :Hey @]. Thanks for your message here. I'm hoping we can have a respectful discussion on the article's t/p. I will not revert your latest edit there, but I disagree with your characterization of the removed content as "irrelevant", because it clearly is, at least to some extent. ] (]) 23:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::Hi SAH. Firstly, I have to agree with {{u|Nyttend}} that your edits to ] are not directly related to the subject of that article and skews the POV of that article. The subject of the added content is furthermore already covered in other articles. | |||
| ::Second, tonight to ] follows the same pattern of using the article's subject as a ] to add information on unrelated topics in order to skew a POV. Please confirm that you understand that you cannot use Article X to write about content that belongs in Article Y and that further NPOV violations will result in escalation. ―<span style="background:#368ec9;border:solid 2px;border-radius:5px"> ''''']''''' </span> 08:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:37, 14 November 2024
 Archives | |||
|
|||
Khalistan movement
Please read WP:COAT: by reverting to add a large quantity of content unrelated to the subject, you're causing the whole situation to adopt a significantly non-neutral point of view. Since your talk page archives have plenty of NPOV warnings, it's clear that you're familiar with our policies, so if you repeatedly restore this content, I'll request a block. Nyttend (talk) 23:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Nyttend. Thanks for your message here. I'm hoping we can have a respectful discussion on the article's t/p. I will not revert your latest edit there, but I disagree with your characterization of the removed content as "irrelevant", because it clearly is, at least to some extent. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 23:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi SAH. Firstly, I have to agree with Nyttend that your edits to Khalistan movement are not directly related to the subject of that article and skews the POV of that article. The subject of the added content is furthermore already covered in other articles.
- Second, this edit tonight to Hardeep Singh Nijjar follows the same pattern of using the article's subject as a coatrack to add information on unrelated topics in order to skew a POV. Please confirm that you understand that you cannot use Article X to write about content that belongs in Article Y and that further NPOV violations will result in escalation. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 08:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)