| Revision as of 21:54, 20 November 2024 editNoobThreePointOh (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,193 edits Undid revision 1258656625 by Qalnor (talk): WP:BLANKING applies here.Tag: Undo← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:55, 20 November 2024 edit undoQalnor (talk | contribs)118 edits →Blanking: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| See ]. You are '''not permitted''' to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. --] (]) 21:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC) | See ]. You are '''not permitted''' to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. --] (]) 21:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :Yamla, I did not remove the unblock request this time, I complied with your requirements and left it in place. Please revert your edit. ] (]) 21:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:55, 20 November 2024
This page is not for spam. If you say something, say it briefly, and include your signature.
Blocked
Your rudeness on User talk:Doug Weller is breathtaking. You have been blocked for 31 hours for personal attacks. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 21:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC).
Qalnor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I won't say I wasn't rude, but it included no personal attacks. I asked him to not spam my talk page, that was well justified. I was rude in including the suggestion that he not take shits there, but this is not a personal attack by any definition of the word. I am not going to justify rudeness by saying that he started the rudeness, but he intentionally dumped a pile of garbage on my talk and user page and while that doesn't justify my own rudeness, his is also completely unjustified. Qalnor (talk) 21:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were blatantly rude, Doug Weller was not. Frankly, you are stunningly lucky to get away with only a 31 hour block. Yamla (talk) 21:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- i didnt touch your user page. i doubt many edotors would consider what i put on your talk page garbage. Doug Weller talk 21:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Doug Weller You can say whatever you want, but this is a 'talk page'. What you added wasn't talk, it was a pages long annoyance. Other users may be more tolerant of this obnoxious behavior, but I have absolutely no tolerance for it and there should not be a default assumption that everyone is OK and happy to deal with that kind of garbage. And you're right, I misspoke, you didn't edit my user page, you edited the talk page twice because one garbage dump of garbage wasn't enough for you, was it. Qalnor (talk) 21:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Blanking
See WP:BLANKING. You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. --Yamla (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yamla, I did not remove the unblock request this time, I complied with your requirements and left it in place. Please revert your edit. Qalnor (talk) 21:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)