Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Ramona Quimby: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:34, 9 December 2024 editPARAKANYAA (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers43,413 edits Ramona Quimby: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 18:49, 10 December 2024 edit undoJclemens (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,438 edits Ramona Quimby: rNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:


:'''Redirect'''. Basically nothing to merge (it's all plot), and while the two sources above could be used to support the series page they are not enough to base an entire character article on. ] (]) 18:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC) :'''Redirect'''. Basically nothing to merge (it's all plot), and while the two sources above could be used to support the series page they are not enough to base an entire character article on. ] (]) 18:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
::No one said they were. Two good sources means GNG is met, so no reason for deletion exists, so the AfD should be closed as keep and any discussion on merging should take place on the talk page--this is not Articles for Discussion, but ''Deletion''. Two sources aren't all that exist, either, and it's puzzling that you would imply that ''only'' these two sources would be used to flesh out the character article. In fact, once notability is established, it's entirely fine to use primary sourcing appropriately in a fictional character article. ] (]) 18:49, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:49, 10 December 2024

Ramona Quimby

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Ramona Quimby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Beezus Quimby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

All of this is in-universe and no real world history, the sources do not help as they talk about the books or movies, not the characters. Toby2023 (talk) 23:29, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Redirect. Basically nothing to merge (it's all plot), and while the two sources above could be used to support the series page they are not enough to base an entire character article on. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
No one said they were. Two good sources means GNG is met, so no reason for deletion exists, so the AfD should be closed as keep and any discussion on merging should take place on the talk page--this is not Articles for Discussion, but Deletion. Two sources aren't all that exist, either, and it's puzzling that you would imply that only these two sources would be used to flesh out the character article. In fact, once notability is established, it's entirely fine to use primary sourcing appropriately in a fictional character article. Jclemens (talk) 18:49, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: