| Revision as of 07:18, 11 December 2024 editMaximoVicente1912 (talk | contribs)24 edits ←Created page with 'The content in the article is composed well and it is presented adequately. The article has history as it explains what led up to Italian Baroque architecture which provides context. The article also presents location that this style can be found in which is necessary. The content has added to the overall quality of the article. Some strengths that could be added to the content is a section that describes the effects that Italian Baroque Architecture had an...'Tags: possible autobiography or conflict of interest Visual edit | Revision as of 07:24, 11 December 2024 edit undoVanderwaalforces (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers39,961 editsm Vanderwaalforces moved page Asialimmer/Italian Baroque architecture/MaximoVicente1912 Peer Review to User:Asialimmer/Italian Baroque architecture/MaximoVicente1912 Peer Review without leaving a redirect: Misplaced userspace contentNext edit → | ||
| (No difference) | |||
Revision as of 07:24, 11 December 2024
The content in the article is composed well and it is presented adequately. The article has history as it explains what led up to Italian Baroque architecture which provides context. The article also presents location that this style can be found in which is necessary. The content has added to the overall quality of the article. Some strengths that could be added to the content is a section that describes the effects that Italian Baroque Architecture had and how it can be observed today. The article is clear and concise as it can be easily understood. The content is backed up by reliable sources. The lead is does include the articles major sections. The article overall is strong as it is presented clearly, as well as neutral, and it is all relevant sources that are up to date.