| Revision as of 20:18, 12 December 2024 editJclemens (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,434 editsm →12 December 2024: comma← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:15, 12 December 2024 edit undoGhostOfDanGurney (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,826 edits →Bruce_Hall_(musician): endorseNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *'''Endorse''' as a reasonable close and the only reasonable close of the deletion discussion. It was ] in place of deletion because the separate article was inadequately sourced and did not support individual ] apart from the band. Any editor may submit a more complete draft for review, with ] and providing information beyond his role in ], provided that any ] must be declared. ] (]) 20:04, 12 December 2024 (UTC) | *'''Endorse''' as a reasonable close and the only reasonable close of the deletion discussion. It was ] in place of deletion because the separate article was inadequately sourced and did not support individual ] apart from the band. Any editor may submit a more complete draft for review, with ] and providing information beyond his role in ], provided that any ] must be declared. ] (]) 20:04, 12 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Endorse''' A draft isn't necessary, nor is our permission. to un-redirect and expand, provided a non-COI editor wants to do that--and there should be someone willing to. A draft is indeed the appropriate step for a COI editor. At the same time, I question the accuracy of the past AfD--it happened right as REO Speedwagon was in the news for the Hall/Cronin rift and cessation of touring, and I see plenty of Google News coverage for Hall--there's no question in my mind that at the time of the AfD there was an adequate amount of sourcing for Hall's individual notability, and the AfD outcome, though clear, was wrong on the merits. ] (]) 20:13, 12 December 2024 (UTC) | *'''Endorse''' A draft isn't necessary, nor is our permission. to un-redirect and expand, provided a non-COI editor wants to do that--and there should be someone willing to. A draft is indeed the appropriate step for a COI editor. At the same time, I question the accuracy of the past AfD--it happened right as REO Speedwagon was in the news for the Hall/Cronin rift and cessation of touring, and I see plenty of Google News coverage for Hall--there's no question in my mind that at the time of the AfD there was an adequate amount of sourcing for Hall's individual notability, and the AfD outcome, though clear, was wrong on the merits. ] (]) 20:13, 12 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Endorse''' - The closer correctly interpreted the consensus of participating editors that the article's subject did not meet Misplaced Pages's ] policies as an individual, and that info about this subject that is known would be better suited for inclusion in another article at this time. As Robert McClenon states, this does not disqualify the subject from a future article if better sourcing can be found. ―] <sub>]</sub> 21:14, 12 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:15, 12 December 2024
< 2024 December 11 Deletion review archives: 2024 December 2024 December 13 >12 December 2024
Bruce_Hall_(musician)
Unsure as to why Bruce's page got deleted, I am reaching out as a rep of Bruce. 2601:5CD:C100:DA10:B0AA:52CB:1381:B68F (talk) 14:56, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Endorse as a reasonable close and the only reasonable close of the deletion discussion. It was redirected in place of deletion because the separate article was inadequately sourced and did not support individual musical notability apart from the band. Any editor may submit a more complete draft for review, with reliable sources and providing information beyond his role in REO Speedwagon, provided that any conflict of interest must be declared. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:04, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Endorse A draft isn't necessary, nor is our permission. to un-redirect and expand, provided a non-COI editor wants to do that--and there should be someone willing to. A draft is indeed the appropriate step for a COI editor. At the same time, I question the accuracy of the past AfD--it happened right as REO Speedwagon was in the news for the Hall/Cronin rift and cessation of touring, and I see plenty of Google News coverage for Hall--there's no question in my mind that at the time of the AfD there was an adequate amount of sourcing for Hall's individual notability, and the AfD outcome, though clear, was wrong on the merits. Jclemens (talk) 20:13, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Endorse - The closer correctly interpreted the consensus of participating editors that the article's subject did not meet Misplaced Pages's notability policies as an individual, and that info about this subject that is known would be better suited for inclusion in another article at this time. As Robert McClenon states, this does not disqualify the subject from a future article if better sourcing can be found. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 21:14, 12 December 2024 (UTC)