| Revision as of 01:32, 27 April 2007 editReddi (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users58,350 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:45, 27 April 2007 edit undoReddi (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users58,350 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| {{col-break}} | {{col-break}} | ||
| {{col-break}} | {{col-break}} | ||
| {{quotation|Wanna know whati think? My opinions, comments, and views http://redding2k.googlepages.com/wikipedia | {{quotation|Wanna know whati think? My opinions, comments, and views ... | ||
| <br> <br> <center> | |||
| http://redding2k.googlepages.com/wikipedia | |||
| </center> <br> <br> | |||
| There you can find my views of the Wikinquisition and it's Minions and Wikpedia's POV Pushers and the pseudoskeptics ... |]|}} | |||
| |]|}} | |||
| {{col-end}} | {{col-end}} | ||
| {{col-end}} | {{col-end}} | ||
| ----- | ----- | ||
| __NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
| Line 70: | Line 73: | ||
| * | * | ||
| ==Removed commentary at top== | |||
| I do not authorize you including any information or commentary about me on this page and therefore have removed it as I consider it a ]. --] 17:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| It is my view of your actions and your interactions with me. It is not a personal attack, it is my experience. ] 17:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Referring to specific people as "evil" or "trolls" goes beyond expressing your experience and becomes a personal attack. I see someone else has removed the section; you will probably add it back again, but I will block you for personal attacks if that kind of language is still included when you do, or if it's repeated elsewhere. See ] -- you can express your opinions of other users, including negative ones, in a way that isn't a personal attack. ]]<sup>]</sup> 18:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: '''If the person is a ], how i am to describe them?''' ScienceApologist has ] about me (and, inaddition, other things and people) in an established online community (aka., Misplaced Pages) to bait me (and others) into edit wars, etc ... not to mention, there has been computer attacks and other negative things originating from his computer system ] 19:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Comment on actions: describe the actions, not the person. So for instance, everything you just wrote in that above paragraph except the first part in bold... that would be a description of SA's actions from your point of view. ]]<sup>]</sup> 20:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] is trying to remove my comments of experiences here @ wikipedia, and has tried to enlist ] : ... I've this a few times. | |||
| Further actions to remove comments : | |||
| ] 18:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] has '''removed my ''' .... the repeated editing of this page may force me to move it to another space temporialy ... | |||
| ] 18:52, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| * Two things you need to know: first, ] explicitly acknowledges that user space may not be used as a soapbox; second, if you continue to publish what you state is the real name of a user who chooses not to identify with that name here, you may be banned. Not just blocked, banned. Outing real identities is at the discretion of the user, not those attacking them. Now here's another small thing: if you persist in linking to the deleted attack on your talk page, then I will delete the history of the page so you can't. Attacks are deleted because they are attacks, linking to the attacks through page histories is ''completely unacceptable''. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 20:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I've globally reverted, but perhaps it was only the shock to see 98 edits of you in the history. If you pls just state what you are trying to achieve at the talk page, I wouldn't revert you restoring your version. --] 17:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == rexresearch == | |||
| With some pain I had to point out that in my opinion the problem with rexresearch links are not spam in the first place. Perhaps yopu may want to add a statement yourself: . --] 21:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Free energy == | |||
| Just a quick request. Could you please maybe try to make fewer small edits. If you want to see how things are going to look, it's easier just to use the preview button. | |||
| ] 07:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Seriously, please stop == | |||
| Please stop making 100s and 100s of small edits. It makes it impossible to keep track of what exactly is happening. | |||
| ] 17:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Please help improve ] == | |||
| You are listed as a participant in WikiProject Energy development, so I am asking you to please consider helping to improve the ] article. This is an ''ad hoc'' article improvement drive. ] 08:16, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == multiple edits == | |||
| This is the third request that I am making, please stop making multiple small edits to a single page. You have made 20+ edits in a row sometimes more. This makes it very difficult for editors to follow what you have done or to keep track of a pages revision history. | |||
| ] 07:24, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I am not sure what to do about that. I usually forget about the preview button. And unless I do not dothe edit i need to do, there is not much I can doabout it. ] 12:23, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Maglev Train== | |||
| Thanks for your to ]. Could I bother you to put in your source(s) though? The article is a ], and putting in unsourced info kinda takes it a step back.--]<sup>]</sup> 14:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Megalith== | |||
| Please stop adding more books to ]. There are enough already. As much as Misplaced Pages is not a repository for lists of external links, neither is it a repository for book lists. Have you read any of these books? Secondly, I would like to echo perfectblue's comments from above: please use the preview feature before saving your edits. To do so is a courtesy for other editors, and eases load on the WP servers. This is now the fourth time on your talk page you have been asked. Thank you. — ]<sup> ]</sup> 22:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I have access to them in libraries .. and more importantly, most of them are available online. Yes. ] 22:48, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Which ones are available online? — ]<sup> ]</sup> 22:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Most of the older ones in totality ... and alot of the newer ones in portions (some more, some less) but can be searched through. ] 22:55, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :They are accessible in libraries to anyone, a feature common to all books. You haven't addressed my question: have you read these books, or are you adding them as the result of a search? The interval between you adding them was consistent with finding a new title, formatting the reference, and then adding it. You continued to make a multitude of small edits without previewing them, failing to heed my, and others, requests. — ]<sup> ]</sup> 11:38, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Adding referencesand material from books is called "fact based research". Try it. You may like it. | |||
| As to the preview thing ... I have always edited wikipeida with smaller edits. | |||
| If there is a rule or policy that says "no small edits without previewing", then pleaase show me. | |||
| I am sorry to fail to heed your, and others, requests ... ] 13:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : Please don't revert without marking your edits as such. Re-adding the occult stuff to the megalith article is not good. And, as everyone else says, please learn how to use preview ] 14:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : I suggest you consider revising this . If you're going to go adding occult refs to normal articles you'll end up just like before ] 14:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: Any reason for the ] (eg., a lack of knowledge or uninformed) and POV (aka., anti-paranormal) edit? ] | |||
| :::Please, Reddy, ]. Remember the last arbitration we went through? --] 15:04, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::First don't threaten me. | |||
| ::::Second, my use is not a ]. There is a lack of knowledge or uninformed about ] and historical studies. Some may be great at the global warming and have knowledge in that field, though. ] | |||
| ::::From ]: "Comment on '''content''', not on the '''contributor'''." You have no way of knowing the familiarity of any of the editors with any of the subjects, just as we have no way of knowing the familiarity of yourself with any of the subjects. --] 15:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::: What content contribution? My comment was on the ''removal of content''. | |||
| :::: I can know some familiarity of some of the editors. Do you have a history degree? | |||
| :::: I can give you my BSc in history, joshua ... ] 15:13, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::You have no way of knowing what degrees any of us hold, nor whether any degrees entitle any of us to decide what is and isn't ignorant with regards to various subjects. You should be proud you graduated from college, but that does not grant you the ability to invoke imprimatur on others. --] 15:16, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Do you have any historical training? | |||
| :::: Ther are ways of knowing what degree anybody holds. 1st ask. 2nd, I can search for it. WMC has a biography @ wikipedia. You and I have dealt with each other and I know what your training is (don't really want to put up the links but I can if you want me to). | |||
| :::: Knowledge in a field does let some know alil' more than others in a field of study. I would not be too knowledgeable about nuclear physics ... besides the history of it. | |||
| :::: BUT when an editor removed reputable and known sources about a article, it's mainly from having a lack of knowledge or being uninformed. | |||
| :::: Look up ]s, ]s, and ]s. | |||
| :::: ] 15:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::You are missing the point, Reddi. There is no hierarchy of ] at Misplaced Pages by ] of the community. You can search for credentials and degrees as much as you want, but this is not ] and there is no hierarchy or vetting process for who is or isn't "knowledgeable" in whatever field. Editors do not have to have a degree to make edits to any article, and more than that you have no way of knowing that all an editor's credentials are accurately and completely compiled on the internet, regardless of how many searches you perform. You have no way of knowing what the reasons are for any editor making any edits here except what they tell you their reasons are. Trying to read into their credentials isn't going to get you very far and is generally considered aggressive for this community. --] 15:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Editors do not have to have a degree to make edits .. I agree. | |||
| :::: A ''way of knowing what the reasons are for any editor making any edits''? '''Ask''' why they did it! | |||
| :::: Is there any reason for the uninformed and POV (aka., anti-paranormal) edits? ] 15:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Block == | |||
| For repeated violation of ] to the extent of ] I've blocked you for a little while. Please be civil ] 19:39, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Member?== | |||
| OK done. (] 01:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)) | |||
| == WP:Paranormal == | |||
| Please stop spamming the pages of users who are in the category. In case you hadn't noticed, there's ] that several people have already added their names onto as it's too big and unwieldy to have the whole list on the main page.—] (]) 01:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <strike>ok ... too late. had one more to go. will i stay under autoblock? ] 01:31, 22 April 2007 (UTC)</strike> | |||
| 15 minutes ] | |||
| = New criticism, comments, and feedback = | = New criticism, comments, and feedback = | ||
| == Block, again == | |||
| I've blocked you for 31 hours for general disruption as well as personally attacking ]. I also have reason to believe that you were trying to influence the outcome of ] or your attempt to "kick" ScienceApologist out of ]—] (]) 03:24, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::: BTW, the people that did "kick" me out of a wikiproject were not blocked. Because they were part of the power structure and have administrator friends. Do you want the link for the time that they did this? ] 03:30, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| WOW! Talk about ] and ]. ] 03:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I feel for you, Reddi. In the end, the only solution is sure to be violence. --] 05:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:45, 27 April 2007
Put new comments below
Past discussion can be seen through the History page
| I am intermittently inactive. | ||
| NOTE: Status is currently intermittent for the foreseeable future. Comments may not be answered in short order. This does not imply the violation of any of the Misplaced Pages policies. I sign on when I can.
My current access to wikipedia is not stable and as such I will not be on much. Misplaced Pages also has grown more closed and biased since my first edits and that saddens me. So Long, and Thanks For All the Fish. J. D. Redding 19:08, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
 |
Please review these articles before commenting:
From time to time I'll respond here and delete the old content; I'll leave them for a few weeks (mostly). JDR 18:52, 31 August 2005 (UTC) |
|
|}
Responses
So Long, and Thanks for the all comments ...
Invitation
As a Wikipedian in Kansas you are cordially invited to become a member of the WikiProject Kansas. If interested, simply add your name to the members list on the project page and add the template {{User WPKansas}} to your own user page. Thanks. (Also, I concur with the comments on your user page. Well said!) StudierMalMarburg 16:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Maybe. Seems if the administrator has blocked me for a bit. Maybe later. J. D. Redding 18:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Bruce DePalma
Bruce DePalma (born Bruno James DePalma) (October 2, 1935–1997), son of noted orthopaedic surgeon Anthony DePalma and elder brother of film director Brian De Palma, was a well known figure in the Free energy suppression community.
De Palma claimed that his N-machine Homopolar generator, a device based on the Faraday disc, could produce five times the energy required to run it. According to mainstream physics, no such device is physically possible. De Palma studied electrical engineering at Harvard (1958) and taught physics at MIT for 15 years, working under Harold Eugene Edgerton. He was also employed by Edwin H. Land of Polaroid fame.
Bruce De Palma's development of the N-machine concept in 1977, among his other anomalous devices (at least one of which, De Palma claimed, displayed anti-gravity characteristics) and the claims surrounding them, set him on a collision course with his more mainstream peers. His claims of "free energy" were vigorously refuted over the course of twenty years, by conventional scientists and some members of the alternative energy community alike.
His search for financial backing for the construction of a marketable N-machine saw him relocate from Santa Barbara, California to Australia c. 1994, and then New Zealand in 1996. Probably his greatest ally in his conviction that the N-machine could solve the world's energy and environmental crisis was Paramahamsa Tewari, a Project Director with the Indian Nuclear Power Corporation, with whom he corresponded regularly over many years. Tewari's Space Power Generator, claimed to be 200% efficient, is based on the same theoretical foundations as the N-machine.
De Palma's death in New Zealand in October 1997 put an end to his most ambitious free energy project, and occurred only weeks prior to the official testing of a device constructed over the course of 6 months in an Auckland workshop. The test was attended by, among others, the project's financial backer, Bruce Bornholdt, a prominent Wellington barrister, as well as the pioneering developer of the Adams motor, Robert Adams (now deceased), who observed the operation of, and measured electrical output from, the N-machine. This single test failed to demonstrate the over-unity potential of the N-machine - most of the output energy being lost as heat - and the project was immediately dissolved.
- THE HOME OF PRIMORDIAL ENERGY, De Palma's website with numerous articles.
- Free Energy - The N-Machine