Misplaced Pages

La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:27, 15 December 2024 editLethargilistic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,817 edits ←Created page with '{{subst:SCOTUS-case|La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States|175|423|December 11|1899|A law is not invalid when a president signs it during a Congressional recess, so long as it is signed within 10 days.}}'  Revision as of 22:29, 15 December 2024 edit undoLethargilistic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,817 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 13: Line 13:
|Subsequent= |Subsequent=
|Holding=A law is not invalid when a president signs it during a Congressional recess, so long as it is signed within 10 days. |Holding=A law is not invalid when a president signs it during a Congressional recess, so long as it is signed within 10 days.
|Majority= |Majority=Harlan
|JoinMajority= |JoinMajority=''unanimous''
⚫ |NotParticipating=Gray, McKenna
|Concurrence=
⚫ |LawsApplied=]
|JoinConcurrence=
|Concurrence2=
|JoinConcurrence2=
|Concurrence/Dissent=
|JoinConcurrence/Dissent=
|Dissent=
|JoinDissent=
|Dissent2=
|JoinDissent2=
|PerCuriam=
⚫ |NotParticipating=
⚫ |LawsApplied=
}} }}


'''''La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States''''', {{ussc|volume=175|page=423|year=1899|el=no}}, was a ] case in which the court held that a law is not invalid when a president signs it during a Congressional recess, so long as it is signed within 10 days.<ref name="case">{{ussc|name=La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States|volume=175|page=423|year=1899}}.</ref> '''''La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States''''', {{ussc|volume=175|page=423|year=1899|el=no}}, was a ] case in which the court held that a law is not invalid when a president signs it during a ], so long as it is signed within 10 days.<ref name="case">{{ussc|name=La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States|volume=175|page=423|year=1899}}.</ref><ref name="Lieberman1999">{{Cite book |last=Lieberman |first=Jethro K. |title=A Practical Companion to the Constitution |year=1999 |pages=353|chapter=Pocket Veto}}</ref>


== References == == References ==

Revision as of 22:29, 15 December 2024

1899 United States Supreme Court case
La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 11, 1899
Full case nameLa Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States
Citations175 U.S. 423 (more)
Holding
A law is not invalid when a president signs it during a Congressional recess, so long as it is signed within 10 days.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Melville Fuller
Associate Justices
John M. Harlan · Horace Gray
David J. Brewer · Henry B. Brown
George Shiras Jr. · Edward D. White
Rufus W. Peckham · Joseph McKenna
Case opinion
MajorityHarlan, joined by unanimous
Gray, McKenna took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
Presentment Clause

La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States, 175 U.S. 423 (1899), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a law is not invalid when a president signs it during a Congressional recess, so long as it is signed within 10 days.

References

  1. La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States, 175 U.S. 423 (1899).
  2. Lieberman, Jethro K. (1999). "Pocket Veto". A Practical Companion to the Constitution. p. 353.

External links

Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: