Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Principal Snyder: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:03, 17 December 2024 editJclemens (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,434 edits Principal Snyder: c← Previous edit Revision as of 11:03, 17 December 2024 edit undoDaranios (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,948 edits KeepNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:
*'''Redirect''' or merge, per Sgeureka. What few sources provide only trivial mentions or ], and this doesn't pass ]. ] (]) 19:31, 16 December 2024 (UTC) *'''Redirect''' or merge, per Sgeureka. What few sources provide only trivial mentions or ], and this doesn't pass ]. ] (]) 19:31, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
:Note that the nominator has {{oldid2|1262720520|left}} the project after being counseled to learn how AfD works and admitting they never did a BEFORE. Right now, there's a lot of people looking at the article and saying "I don't see sources in the article, redirect it" and others saying "Sources are easy to find, I see them." Both of which are fine opinions, but the latter are less policy based, per ] and ]--NOT#PLOT doesn't apply to an improved version of the article, and so is not a reason for deletion. ] (]) 10:03, 17 December 2024 (UTC) :Note that the nominator has {{oldid2|1262720520|left}} the project after being counseled to learn how AfD works and admitting they never did a BEFORE. Right now, there's a lot of people looking at the article and saying "I don't see sources in the article, redirect it" and others saying "Sources are easy to find, I see them." Both of which are fine opinions, but the latter are less policy based, per ] and ]--NOT#PLOT doesn't apply to an improved version of the article, and so is not a reason for deletion. ] (]) 10:03, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' I think secondary sources like "" and "", while remaining close to the plot, have enough characterization and commentary of what the character represents in the series to fullfill the requirements of both ] and ]. The nomination reads a lot like it was considering only the current state of the article, which is ]. At least, as {{u|Jclemens}} already said, there is no ] articluated. ] (]) 11:03, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:03, 17 December 2024

Principal Snyder

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Principal Snyder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This Buffy character doesn't meet WP:FICTION or WP:GNG, there is no SIGCOV of him. Everything about the character is all in universe information, to make it worse, it only sites one unreliable source. Merge or Redirect to List of Buffy the Vampire Slayer characters. Toby2023 (talk) 03:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:41, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Note that the nominator has left the project after being counseled to learn how AfD works and admitting they never did a BEFORE. Right now, there's a lot of people looking at the article and saying "I don't see sources in the article, redirect it" and others saying "Sources are easy to find, I see them." Both of which are fine opinions, but the latter are less policy based, per WP:NEXIST and WP:SURMOUNTABLE--NOT#PLOT doesn't apply to an improved version of the article, and so is not a reason for deletion. Jclemens (talk) 10:03, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: