Revision as of 16:13, 19 December 2024 editGregariousMadness (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users623 edits →Contested deletion: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:15, 19 December 2024 edit undoGregariousMadness (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users623 edits →Contested deletionNext edit → | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:I'm admittedly not too involved in this discussion, so I'll refrain from saying much, but I have no issues with keeping this article around since it seems to meet bare notability and can be verified as being a new version of the article via the creator's edit history. I'd appreciate an admin verifying the edit histories are different so as to dispel all reasonable doubt. However, I do have concerns about the fact there's an ongoing deletion review for the subject. I'm admittedly unsure as to how it's handled when the article is recreated while the deletion review is ongoing, but I do have concerns it may interfere with the discussion. It's still not grounds for a speedy to my knowledge, but there may be problems there. ''] Considerer:'' ''']''' (]) (]) 15:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | :I'm admittedly not too involved in this discussion, so I'll refrain from saying much, but I have no issues with keeping this article around since it seems to meet bare notability and can be verified as being a new version of the article via the creator's edit history. I'd appreciate an admin verifying the edit histories are different so as to dispel all reasonable doubt. However, I do have concerns about the fact there's an ongoing deletion review for the subject. I'm admittedly unsure as to how it's handled when the article is recreated while the deletion review is ongoing, but I do have concerns it may interfere with the discussion. It's still not grounds for a speedy to my knowledge, but there may be problems there. ''] Considerer:'' ''']''' (]) (]) 15:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
::That's my mistake. When I was creating the draft, it said that approvals could take up to 8 weeks, so I decided to submit it and continue editing it. I wasn't expecting it to be approved so quickly. ] (]) 16:13, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | ::That's my mistake. When I was creating the draft, it said that approvals could take up to 8 weeks, so I decided to submit it and continue editing it. I wasn't expecting it to be approved so quickly. But it's ''definitely'' not true that what I wrote is an ''unchanged draft''. I spent so much time researching and writing this up. ] (]) 16:13, 19 December 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:15, 19 December 2024
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
User:Sirfurboy and User:Pokelego999, I rewrote this article from scratch last night. You can see the edit history to prove it. I even asked the closing admin to not give me the old version of the article because I wanted to do the subject justice. I even asked User:Liz what the proper steps I should take to make sure that I was doing everything correctly. I spent hours writing up a neutral, original version of the article as a draft, submitted it to AfC, and continued to make edits throughout the day. Please reconsider the speedy deletion, because it isn't an unaltered and unimproved version of the article. GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 15:40, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm admittedly not too involved in this discussion, so I'll refrain from saying much, but I have no issues with keeping this article around since it seems to meet bare notability and can be verified as being a new version of the article via the creator's edit history. I'd appreciate an admin verifying the edit histories are different so as to dispel all reasonable doubt. However, I do have concerns about the fact there's an ongoing deletion review for the subject. I'm admittedly unsure as to how it's handled when the article is recreated while the deletion review is ongoing, but I do have concerns it may interfere with the discussion. It's still not grounds for a speedy to my knowledge, but there may be problems there. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 15:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- That's my mistake. When I was creating the draft, it said that approvals could take up to 8 weeks, so I decided to submit it and continue editing it. I wasn't expecting it to be approved so quickly. But it's definitely not true that what I wrote is an unchanged draft. I spent so much time researching and writing this up. GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 16:13, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- Unassessed AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/19 December 2024
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Unassessed Internet articles
- Unknown-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- Unassessed Internet culture articles
- Unknown-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- Unassessed Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- Unassessed My Little Pony articles
- Unknown-importance My Little Pony articles
- WikiProject My Little Pony articles
- WikiProject Artificial Intelligence articles