Revision as of 23:01, 20 December 2024 editLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,676 edits Removed: Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (species).← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:01, 22 December 2024 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,676 edits Removed: Misplaced Pages:Username policy/ORGNAME/G11 in sandboxes RFC.Next edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{rfcquote|text= | {{rfcquote|text= | ||
This a request for comment on the above question and previous section. Is the Mackinac Center for Public Policy a Conservative group and should be described as such? And does the polices listed above overrule the more widely available references describing their relationships and them as Conservative vs Free-Market? ] (]) 02:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)}} | This a request for comment on the above question and previous section. Is the Mackinac Center for Public Policy a Conservative group and should be described as such? And does the polices listed above overrule the more widely available references describing their relationships and them as Conservative vs Free-Market? ] (]) 02:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)}} | ||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
Several discussions, both recent and in past years, have brought up questions regarding the utility and fairness of how we deal with promotional names. It seems as though a review is in order so that consensus on how the community wants this policy enforced is more clear. 21:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | ''']''' | ||
{{rfcquote|text= | {{rfcquote|text= |
Revision as of 16:01, 22 December 2024
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
Talk:Mackinac Center for Public Policy
This a request for comment on the above question and previous section. Is the Mackinac Center for Public Policy a Conservative group and should be described as such? And does the polices listed above overrule the more widely available references describing their relationships and them as Conservative vs Free-Market? ContentEditman (talk) 02:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC) |
Misplaced Pages:Village pump (policy)
Should Misplaced Pages:Administrators#Restoration of admin tools be amended to:
Background: This issue arose in one recent RfA and is currently being discussed in an ongoing RfA. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:14, 15 December 2024 (UTC) |
Misplaced Pages talk:Please do not bite the newcomers
There are several questions, as follows:
The proposed rewrite can be found here: Misplaced Pages:Please do not bite the newcomers/rewrite. Please refrain from making significant changes to the rewrite while the RfC is ongoing. Also see the idea lab discussion: Misplaced Pages:Village pump (idea lab) § Rewriting WP:BITE. After the last RfC, User:Alalch E. has done work on cleaning up the "Understanding newcomers" section. Ca 14:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Second Nagorno-Karabakh War
The RfC is whether to retain or remove Syrian mercenaries from the belligerents section of the infobox. Cinderella157 (talk) 02:58, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
Should the sentence in the instructions to this template "If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article" be reworded? Fangz (talk) 10:14, 4 December 2024 (UTC) |
Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (sports)
RfC: Should the following paragraph be added to WP:NMOTORSPORT?
note: strikethrough text was replaced by underlined text after the proposal per the discussion. |
Misplaced Pages talk:Biographies of living persons
I propose the following text be added to WP:SUSPECT:
I have decided to post this as an RfC as this would involve a non-trivial amendment to WP:POLICY and the issue has become a contentious point of debate involving several nominations at WP:ITNC. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:55, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for comment (All) | |
---|---|
Articles (All) |
|
Non-articles (All) | |
Instructions | To add a discussion to this list:
|
For more information, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. Report problems to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment. Lists are updated every hour by Legobot. |