Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Maths, science, and technology: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:01, 21 December 2024 editLegobot (talk \| contribs)Bots1,667,683 edits Removed: Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Weather.← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 16:01, 22 December 2024 edit undoLegobot (talk \| contribs)Bots1,667,683 edits Removed: Talk:Decline in insect populations.
Line 39:		Line 39:
	* ]		* ]
	] (]) 19:46, 5 December 2024 (UTC)}}		] (]) 19:46, 5 December 2024 (UTC)}}
	''']'''
	{{rfcquote\|text=
	Include or Exclude this text:
	In October 2024, researchers from the ] tested the influence of insecticides, herbicides, fungicides and plant growth inhibitors in the laboratory against to larvae of the ], caterpillars of painted lady butterflies (]) and in larvae of ] (]). Results suggested that agrochemical exposure, even at sublethal levels, affects insect populations.<ref>{{Cite journal \|last=Gandara \|first=Lautaro \|last2=Jacoby \|first2=Richard \|last3=Laurent \|first3=François \|last4=Spatuzzi \|first4=Matteo \|last5=Vlachopoulos \|first5=Nikolaos \|last6=Borst \|first6=Noa O. \|last7=Ekmen \|first7=Gülina \|last8=Potel \|first8=Clement M. \|last9=Garrido-Rodriguez \|first9=Martin \|last10=Böhmert \|first10=Antonia L. \|last11=Misunou \|first11=Natalia \|last12=Bartmanski \|first12=Bartosz J. \|last13=Li \|first13=Xueying C. \|last14=Kutra \|first14=Dominik \|last15=Hériché \|first15=Jean-Karim \|date=2024-10-25 \|title=Pervasive sublethal effects of agrochemicals on insects at environmentally relevant concentrations \|url=https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ado0251 \|journal=Science \|language=en \|volume=386 \|issue=6720 \|pages=446–453 \|doi=10.1126/science.ado0251 \|issn=0036-8075}}</ref>

	Thanks for your comments! ] (]) 15:28, 22 November 2024 (UTC)}}
	{{RFC list footer\|sci\|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }}		{{RFC list footer\|sci\|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }}

Latest revision as of 16:01, 22 December 2024

The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:

Talk:2005 Birmingham tornado

Should the article’s infobox reflect EF2/T4 or F3/T5-6? This question stems from the fact the infobox inputs can only accept a single set of values (i.e. EF2/T4 or F3/T5-6, not both). The EF2/T4 rating comes from a peer reviewed paper by Timothy P. Marshall and Stuart Robinson with the Haag Engineering Co. which was published in the American Meteorological Society in August 2006. The F3/T5-6 rating comes from the Tornado and Storm Research Organisation (TORRO), the creators of the TORRO scale, T-scale, published in this 2015 paper.

Since the infobox can only contain one set of the ratings, this discussion more or less needs to determine which source (Haag Engineering Co. or TORRO) should be the infobox source.

Option 1 — EF2/T4 using the Haag Engineering Co. paper.
Option 2 — F3/T5-6 using the TORRO paper.

The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Catnip

Should the lead of the article mention alternatives that may affect cats not affected by catnip? Escape Orbit 13:13, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Talk:2020 Cookeville tornado

I have serious doubts about the authenticity of the tornado image in the article, including whether it was truthfully even taken in Cookeville. The image mentions it was taken from Reddit, and searching the image on Reddit reveals a high level of skepticism even from users there. I propose that this image be discussed and potentially removed unless it can be otherwise proven that the picture was taken in Cookeville on March 3. United States Man (talk) 19:46, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Weather

Should weak and unimpactful tornadoes be included in list articles? Departure– (talk) 14:20, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

Is the blog Science-Based Medicine in whole or in part, a self-published source? Iljhgtn (talk) 01:20, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Earth

Which picture should be used in the lead?

A: Color-calibrated picture (view in article)
B: NASA picture
(view in article)
C: 2018 NASA image
(view in article)

Prior discussion:

WhatisMars (talk) 19:46, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

v t e Requests for comment (All)
Articles (All)	Biographies (bio) Economy, trade, and companies (econ) History and geography (hist) Language and linguistics (lang) Maths, science, and technology (sci) Media, the arts, and architecture (media) Politics, government, and law (pol) Religion and philosophy (reli) Society, sports, and culture (soc)
Non-articles (All)	Misplaced Pages style and naming (style) Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines (policy) WikiProjects and collaborations (proj) Misplaced Pages technical issues and templates (tech) Misplaced Pages proposals (prop) Unsorted
Instructions	To add a discussion to this list: Add the tag `{{rfc\|xxx}}` at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, `{{rfc\|xxx\|yyy}}`, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
For more information, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. Report problems to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment. Lists are updated every hour by Legobot.