| Revision as of 01:13, 22 December 2024 editButterscotch Beluga (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,121 edits Removing comment by non-extended confirmed user - Please limit your participation in WP:PIA to edit requests only until extended confirmed← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:26, 22 December 2024 edit undoButterscotch Beluga (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,121 edits →Muslim migrations to Ottoman Palestine: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| :'''Speedy keep'''. "Article is Zionist propaganda" is not a valid deletion argument. Specifically, according to ], this is a nomination that is {{tq|clearly an attempt to end an editing dispute through deletion, where dispute resolution is a more appropriate course}}. <span class="nowrap">] (]) <small>(please ] me on reply)</small></span> 00:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | :'''Speedy keep'''. "Article is Zionist propaganda" is not a valid deletion argument. Specifically, according to ], this is a nomination that is {{tq|clearly an attempt to end an editing dispute through deletion, where dispute resolution is a more appropriate course}}. <span class="nowrap">] (]) <small>(please ] me on reply)</small></span> 00:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::While I agree their wording is unnecessarily combative, ] is still a valid reason to bring this here & I'm unsure how it could be considered an "attempt to end an editing dispute." Who is the editing dispute between? ] (]) 01:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' or '''Merge''' to ]. I don't think the wording of this proposal was necessary, but regardless, outside of being mostly written by a blocked sock, this article feels like undetailed retreading of already existing articles. It relies too much on the writings of 1 author, David Grossman, with 5/16 sources written by him + as far as I can tell online, he also had a hand in Zvi Ilan's 'Turkmens, Circassians, and Bosnians in Northern Sharon", though I could be misreading that. It also contains content unrelated to the topic such as ] communities & settlement to areas that weren't a part of Ottoman Palestine like Damascus, Ajloun, and the Hauran. - ] (]) 01:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' or '''Merge''' to ]. I don't think the wording of this proposal was necessary, but regardless, outside of being mostly written by a blocked sock, this article feels like undetailed retreading of already existing articles. It relies too much on the writings of 1 author, David Grossman, with 5/16 sources written by him + as far as I can tell online, he also had a hand in Zvi Ilan's 'Turkmens, Circassians, and Bosnians in Northern Sharon", though I could be misreading that. It also contains content unrelated to the topic such as ] communities & settlement to areas that weren't a part of Ottoman Palestine like Damascus, Ajloun, and the Hauran. - ] (]) 01:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:26, 22 December 2024
Muslim migrations to Ottoman Palestine
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Muslim migrations to Ottoman Palestine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article started by Icewhiz sock. Article is taken straight from Zionist propaganda: Palestinians are "recent" immigrants to Israel/Palestine, when Jewish immigration was far larger Huldra (talk) 23:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Israel and Palestine. Huldra (talk) 23:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Islam. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:01, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep if there is a POV bias in this page, that should be resolved by editing. If the topic is notable, which it appears to be, that wouldn't be a valid deletion rationale. Has sources, and ineligible for G5 since other contributions were made after the sock. Andre🚐 00:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. "Article is Zionist propaganda" is not a valid deletion argument. Specifically, according to WP:SKCRIT, this is a nomination that is
clearly an attempt to end an editing dispute through deletion, where dispute resolution is a more appropriate course
. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 00:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC)- While I agree their wording is unnecessarily combative, WP:G5 is still a valid reason to bring this here & I'm unsure how it could be considered an "attempt to end an editing dispute." Who is the editing dispute between? Butterscotch Beluga (talk) 01:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete or Merge to Demographic history of Palestine (region). I don't think the wording of this proposal was necessary, but regardless, outside of being mostly written by a blocked sock, this article feels like undetailed retreading of already existing articles. It relies too much on the writings of 1 author, David Grossman, with 5/16 sources written by him + as far as I can tell online, he also had a hand in Zvi Ilan's 'Turkmens, Circassians, and Bosnians in Northern Sharon", though I could be misreading that. It also contains content unrelated to the topic such as Druze communities & settlement to areas that weren't a part of Ottoman Palestine like Damascus, Ajloun, and the Hauran. - Butterscotch Beluga (talk) 01:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)