Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration | Requests Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:41, 22 December 2024 view sourceSilverLocust (talk | contribs)Administrators24,830 edits users reverting changes made for accurcy despite repeat requests and backed by verifiable evidences: Removing request for arbitration: declined as prematureTag: Manual revert← Previous edit Revision as of 04:24, 26 December 2024 view source Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk | contribs)47 editsNo edit summaryTag: RevertedNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=auto</noinclude>}} {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=auto</noinclude>}}
<noinclude>{{-}}</noinclude> <noinclude>{{-}}</noinclude>

== Sabotage of Lindy Li's page ==
'''Initiated by ''' ] (]) '''at''' 04:24, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

=== Proposed parties ===
<!-- Please change "userlinks" to "admin" if the party is an administrator. The users listed should only be changed after filing by clerks and Arbitrators. All others should ask to add a party. One place to request an addition is at the clerks noticeboard ]. -->
*{{userlinks|Napoleonjosephine2020}}, ''filing party''
*{{userlinks|EncycloDeterminate}}

;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. -->
*

;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried
* https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Pppery#c-Deepfriedokra-20241225233600-Napoleonjosephine2020-20241225232900
* https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Napoleonjosephine2020

=== Statement by Napoleonjosephine2020 ===
Dear Committee,

Someone made an inflammatory edit to Li's page that is intended to cast her in a negative light. On his own talk page (EncycloDeterminate), this same editor linked to a since-deleted tweet in which he attacked Lindy Li (the subject of the Misplaced Pages article) as an "opportunistic grifter".

He is also on Reddit posting about this editing war and openly admitted to disliking Li and admitted that his personal dislike could fairly in itself be grounds for removing his edit.

Anyone with clear animus and hatred for a subject should be barred from editing the subject's page. Would really appreciate your intervention. He deleted his X post after I shared it on a talk page but I have screenshots of both his X and Reddit posts and am happy to email them to all the parties concerned. I linked to his Reddit post but it was taken down.

I have tried many times to stop this self-avowed Kamala Harris supporter from sabotaging Li's page but I fear that those involved are ideologically biased and the consensus thus far has a partisan slant. Thank you so much for your time and consideration.
=== Statement by EncycloDeterminate ===
=== Statement by {Non-party} ===
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
<!-- * Please copy this section for the next person. * -->

=== Sabotage of Lindy Li's page: Clerk notes ===
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).''
*

=== Sabotage of Lindy Li's page: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0> ===
{{anchor|1=Sabotage of Lindy Li's page: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)</small>
*

Revision as of 04:24, 26 December 2024

"WP:ARC" redirects here. For a guide on talk page archiving, see H:ARC. Arbitration Committee proceedings Case requests
Request name Motions Initiated Votes
Sabotage of Lindy Li's page   26 December 2024 0/0/0
Open cases
Case name Links Evidence due Prop. Dec. due
Palestine-Israel articles 5 (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) 21 Dec 2024 11 Jan 2025
Recently closed cases (Past cases)

No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).

Clarification and Amendment requests

Currently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.

Arbitrator motions
Motion name Date posted
Arbitrator workflow motions 1 December 2024
Requests for arbitration


Shortcuts

About this page

Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority).

Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests.

Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace.

To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.


File an arbitration request


Guidance on participation and word limits

Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.

  • Motivation. Word limits are imposed to promote clarity and focus on the issues at hand and to ensure that arbitrators are able to fully take in submissions. Arbitrators must read a large volume of information across many matters in the course of their service on the Committee, so submissions that exceed word limits may be disregarded. For the sake of fairness and to discourage gamesmanship (i.e., to disincentivize "asking forgiveness rather than permission"), word limits are actively enforced.
  • In general. Most submissions to the Arbitration Committee (including statements in arbitration case requests and ARCAs and evidence submissions in arbitration cases) are limited to 500 words, plus 50 diffs. During the evidence phase of an accepted case, named parties are granted an automatic extension to 1000 words plus 100 diffs.
  • Sectioned discussion. To facilitate review by arbitrators, you should edit only in your own section. Address your submission to arbitrators, not to other participants. If you wish to rebut, clarify, or otherwise refer to another submission for the benefit of arbitrators, you may do so within your own section. (More information.)
  • Requesting an extension. You may request a word limit extension in your submission itself (using the {{@ArbComClerks}} template) or by emailing clerks-l@lists.wikimedia.org. In your request, you should briefly (in 1-2 sentences) include (a) why you need additional words and (b) a broad outline of what you hope to discuss in your extended submission. The Committee endeavors to act upon extension requests promptly and aims to offer flexibility where warranted.
    • Members of the Committee may also grant extensions when they ask direct questions to facilitate answers to those questions.
  • Refactoring statements. You should write carefully and concisely from the start. It is impermissible to rewrite a statement to shorten it after a significant amount of time has passed or after anyone has responded to it (see Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines § Editing own comments), so it is often advisable to submit a brief initial statement to leave room to respond to other users if the need arises.
  • Sign submissions. In order for arbitrators and other participants to understand the order of submissions, sign your submission and each addition (using ~~~~).
  • Word limit violations. Submissions that exceed the word limit will generally be "hatted" (collapsed), and arbitrators may opt not to consider them.
  • Counting words. Words are counted on the rendered text (not wikitext) of the statement (i.e., the number of words that you would see by copy-pasting the page section containing your statement into a text editor or word count tool). This internal gadget may also be helpful.
  • Sanctions. Please note that members and clerks of the Committee may impose appropriate sanctions when necessary to promote the effective functioning of the arbitration process.

General guidance

  • This page is for statements, not discussion.
  • Arbitrators or clerks may refactor or delete statements, e.g. off-topic or unproductive remarks, without warning.
  • Banned users may request arbitration via the committee contact page; don't try to edit this page.
  • Under no circumstances should you remove requests from this page, or open a case (even for accepted requests), unless you are an arbitrator or clerk.
  • After a request is filed, the arbitrators will vote on accepting or declining the case. The <0/0/0> tally counts the arbitrators voting accept/decline/recuse.
  • Declined case requests are logged at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Index/Declined requests. Accepted case requests are opened as cases, and logged at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Index/Cases once closed.

Sabotage of Lindy Li's page

Initiated by Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk) at 04:24, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Proposed parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

Statement by Napoleonjosephine2020

Dear Committee,

Someone made an inflammatory edit to Li's page that is intended to cast her in a negative light. On his own talk page (EncycloDeterminate), this same editor linked to a since-deleted tweet in which he attacked Lindy Li (the subject of the Misplaced Pages article) as an "opportunistic grifter".

He is also on Reddit posting about this editing war and openly admitted to disliking Li and admitted that his personal dislike could fairly in itself be grounds for removing his edit.

Anyone with clear animus and hatred for a subject should be barred from editing the subject's page. Would really appreciate your intervention. He deleted his X post after I shared it on a talk page but I have screenshots of both his X and Reddit posts and am happy to email them to all the parties concerned. I linked to his Reddit post but it was taken down.

I have tried many times to stop this self-avowed Kamala Harris supporter from sabotaging Li's page but I fear that those involved are ideologically biased and the consensus thus far has a partisan slant. Thank you so much for your time and consideration.

Statement by EncycloDeterminate

Statement by {Non-party}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

Sabotage of Lindy Li's page: Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

Sabotage of Lindy Li's page: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>-Sabotage_of_Lindy_Li's_page">

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)