Revision as of 22:56, 28 December 2024 editTornadoLGS (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,648 edits →User-reported: see also deleted contribsTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:04, 28 December 2024 edit undoHBC AIV helperbot14 (talk | contribs)Bots27,187 edits 2 users left, rm Embrace.photo (blocked indef by ToBeFree) (ACB)Tag: Manual revertNext edit → | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* {{Vandal|72.134.38.53}} The IP (along with another IP {{u|67.240.64.226}}) illegally removed the languages currently available from the infobox website of the ] page when in reality they have not made an official announcement over the expansion of its streaming service to more countries, more territories and more languages. See history review difference here: , , , , , , and now recently added several European languages that are not officially available here, for example: ] (]) 22:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | * {{Vandal|72.134.38.53}} The IP (along with another IP {{u|67.240.64.226}}) illegally removed the languages currently available from the infobox website of the ] page when in reality they have not made an official announcement over the expansion of its streaming service to more countries, more territories and more languages. See history review difference here: , , , , , , and now recently added several European languages that are not officially available here, for example: ] (]) 22:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
*:Making the same report as yesterday when it went entirely unactioned is not likely to get it actioned. To me this is not obviously vandalism, at best a case of unsourced editing, but that's only at best. It more looks like this is a content dispute. On top of that, there has been sockpuppetry on the article which would leave me questioning motives in general. If you believe further action is warranted, you may request assistance at ]. ] (]) 22:35, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | *:Making the same report as yesterday when it went entirely unactioned is not likely to get it actioned. To me this is not obviously vandalism, at best a case of unsourced editing, but that's only at best. It more looks like this is a content dispute. On top of that, there has been sockpuppetry on the article which would leave me questioning motives in general. If you believe further action is warranted, you may request assistance at ]. ] (]) 22:35, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
*{{vandal|Embrace.photo}} – Account is being used for self-promotion. Editing history suggests ] for autoconfirmed status. See also deleted contribs. ] (]) 22:55, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:04, 28 December 2024
Noticeboard for persistent vandalismNoticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles, content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
This page was last updated at 14:04 on 1 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
Reports
Bot-reported
- 219.89.40.5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 58 (Long-term pattern abuse, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Stale warning. Last warning was issued two weeks ago. Daniel Case (talk) 06:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Saidgelle (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Rendi Hieronimus WilhelmusRandy Jerome willis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 793 twice in the last 5 minutes (Common spam/scam phone numbers, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:35, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- 2806:2F0:4581:F850:52A3:B5D:312C:26 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On KTLM (diff): Possible block evasion: similar attempts to add Mexico information to US border stations as 189.179.117.17, itself blocked as an evasion of the block on the 187.190.223.108 proxy. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Sockpuppet investigations. Peaceray (talk) 20:38, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- 72.134.38.53 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) The IP (along with another IP 67.240.64.226) illegally removed the languages currently available from the infobox website of the Crunchyroll page when in reality they have not made an official announcement over the expansion of its streaming service to more countries, more territories and more languages. See history review difference here: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and now recently added several European languages that are not officially available here, for example: 8 190.167.0.99 (talk) 22:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Making the same report as yesterday when it went entirely unactioned is not likely to get it actioned. To me this is not obviously vandalism, at best a case of unsourced editing, but that's only at best. It more looks like this is a content dispute. On top of that, there has been sockpuppetry on the article which would leave me questioning motives in general. If you believe further action is warranted, you may request assistance at WP:ANI. Izno (talk) 22:35, 28 December 2024 (UTC)