Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:09, 30 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Huaynaputina article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days

	Huaynaputina is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article will appear on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 19, 2025.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 2, 2019 Good article nominee Listed March 26, 2021 Featured article candidate Not promoted April 12, 2021 Peer review Reviewed June 10, 2021 Featured article candidate Promoted Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 19, 2009, February 19, 2010, February 19, 2011, February 19, 2013, February 19, 2015, February 19, 2017, February 19, 2018, February 19, 2019, February 19, 2021, February 19, 2022, and February 19, 2023. Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Volcanoes High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Peru High‑importance This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Misplaced Pages. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Peru To-do: edit history watch purge Assess and prioritise articles (log) Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate Create: Expand: new articles; top importance articles FAC / FLC: Peru national football team GAN: Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes Translate: National University of San Marcos Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive Wikify: articles needing attention Mountains High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: Google Scholar Google

1600 eruption

Should the 1600 eruption be moved to its own article like with many other significant eruptions? Given that it is a significant historical eruption and the article is lengthy, it makes perfect sense in my opinion. Mrmp2402 (talk) 10:00, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Eh, I think that since this volcano draws its importance almost entirely from that eruption, it can be left together. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:48, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

IUGS heritage site

How much information do we take from this. I've put in a small paragraph here. This paragraph seems kind of excessive, especially since the IUGS site isn't actually the volcano that the article is about; rather, it's the archaeological site that is mentioned in passing. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

2023 update

Mostly done, save for the following:

• "Ekaykin, A. A., and A. N. Veres. "Temperature shifts in Central Antarctica after major volcanic eruptions in the second millennium of the Common Era." АРКТИКИ И АНТАРКТИКИ 69.3 (2023): 375" unknown source and do we need a discussion on temperature of Antarctica?

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Geotourism section?

I am not sure whether this report on its own justifies a section on geotourism (maybe with a secondary source?), but if we want a section then it would be an eminently well-suited source. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

2024 update

This Spanish meta-discussion about the relative importance of religious and scientific interpretations may be worth citing. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Footnotes

Opening discussion on whether we need the footnotes to explain terms. I know at FAC some people want the terms explained and not just linked to. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

@Atsee this is a featured article, if you want to make changes, major / bodywide ones, discuss with the other editors, you do not have the right to enforce your ediorial changes without notifying Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 15:52, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

What, if anything, is wrong with this version, from before Atsee's first edit? Atsee, Dora the Axe-poorer is right -- you can certainly edit a featured article, but if it's featured it means multiple editors have agreed to the text, so you should generally be a bit more cautious, and if reverted the talk page is the way to go. And re the footnotes, personally I'm OK with linking terms but there are many editors who feel explanatory footnotes are helpful in articles with a lot of technical terms. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:09, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages featured articles
• Featured articles that have not appeared on the main page
• Old requests for peer review
• FA-Class WikiProject Volcanoes articles
• High-importance WikiProject Volcanoes articles
• All WikiProject Volcanoes pages
• FA-Class Peru articles
• High-importance Peru articles
• FA-Class Mountain articles
• High-importance Mountain articles
• All WikiProject Mountains pages