| Revision as of 06:53, 23 April 2005 editとある白い猫 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,796 edits →User posts: {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:03, 23 April 2005 edit undoDavenbelle (talk | contribs)3,206 edits an entirely obvious personal attackNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:Coolcat/Talk Template}} | {{User:Coolcat/Talk Template}} | ||
| = User posts: {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}} = | = User posts: {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}} = | ||
| == an entirely obvious personal attack == | |||
| :''"Stop being silly, do you have some sort of sick wet dream to stare at a dead naked woman? Or do you enjoy staring at dead chineese? Not everyone likes to see the pictures, but people can read."'' — ] 06:47, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ===Not quite=== | |||
| I dont see that as a personal attack, you are welcome to fill a complaint though. Please stop reverting a topic which you are not a part of the discussion. There are things we agreed in the disucssion(s) and agreements long before I arrived at the article. Ignoring concensius is not good practice and waistes my and your time. --] ] 06:49, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| : Well I see it as an entirely obvious one; and I not that you archived your talk page within minutes of my first posting it here. — ] 07:03, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:03, 23 April 2005
User posts: 3 January 2025
an entirely obvious personal attack
- "Stop being silly, do you have some sort of sick wet dream to stare at a dead naked woman? Or do you enjoy staring at dead chineese? Not everyone likes to see the pictures, but people can read." — Davenbelle 06:47, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
Not quite
I dont see that as a personal attack, you are welcome to fill a complaint though. Please stop reverting a topic which you are not a part of the discussion. There are things we agreed in the disucssion(s) and agreements long before I arrived at the article. Ignoring concensius is not good practice and waistes my and your time. --Cool Cat 06:49, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Well I see it as an entirely obvious one; and I not that you archived your talk page within minutes of my first posting it here. — Davenbelle 07:03, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)