Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/2007 Estonian unrest: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:52, 30 April 2007 editDe Administrando Imperio (talk | contribs)15,522 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 11:44, 30 April 2007 edit undo193.40.5.245 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
:'''Merge and Delete''' - No point in having to observe two articles for provocations and false statements. Also it is easyer to update one page. ] 10:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC) :'''Merge and Delete''' - No point in having to observe two articles for provocations and false statements. Also it is easyer to update one page. ] 10:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
:'''Keep''' like nightstallion --] (]) 10:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC) :'''Keep''' like nightstallion --] (]) 10:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
:''Delete'' - one article is good enough. We can rename the article ] into ], if necessary. ] 11:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:44, 30 April 2007

We cannot have two different articles competing with the same updates. I've now pulled the emergency break. How can we solve this problem? What do you think? Camptown 09:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Just wondering about the reason for the creation of this page. From what I can see right now, it has created a situation where both pages have most of the same info but aren't updated at the same rate. If you trully want to make this page the centrepiece, you should move most of the Bronze Soldier of Tallinn article here, including all of the sections about the reason for this unrest. Esn 07:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Delete: I think this article should be deleted as soon as possible, and all updates take place at the main article: Bronze Soldier of Tallinn. --Camptown 08:03, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Merge & Delete - I believe this is a case of Recentism I agree if should be merged with the main article (and then this entry deleted). -- Rehnn83 08:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Merge and Delete This article is just a duplication and very confusing. We now have a situation with updates taking place on two different articles covering the same topic. Important developments are expected within the next few days. Let Bronze Soldier of Tallinn article remain the sole and only article for that. Bondkaka 08:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep, it's notable separately. —Nightstallion (?) 09:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Merge & Delete now - if there will be further unrest, the article can be restarted, perhaps with a more appropriate name, though. DLX 10:20, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Merge and Delete - No point in having to observe two articles for provocations and false statements. Also it is easyer to update one page. Suva 10:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep like nightstallion --TheFEARgod (Ч) 10:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete - one article is good enough. We can rename the article Bronze Soldier of Tallinn into Bronze Soldier Controversy, if necessary. 193.40.5.245 11:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)